Am 06.08.2010 14:41, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Yes, I think so. It was there for transition purposes in ubuntu, but I
think we no longer need it their as well
Alright, I think lame and xvidcore are ready for a new upload.
- Fabian
___
pkg-multimedi
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 07:50:41 (EDT), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> I've got two more questions with regard to lame:
>
> - Shouldn't we remove the .la file from the -dev package?
Yes, we should.
> - Should the shared lib package really Provides: liblame0?
Yes, I think so. It was there for transit
I've got two more questions with regard to lame:
- Shouldn't we remove the .la file from the -dev package?
- Should the shared lib package really Provides: liblame0?
- Fabian
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lis
lame_3.98.4-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libmp3lame-dev_3.98.4-1_i386.deb
lame-doc_3.98.4-1_all.deb
lame_3.98.4-1.debian.tar.gz
lame_3.98.4.orig.tar.gz
lame_3.98.4-1_i386.deb
libmp3lame0_3.98.4-1_i386.deb
lame_3.98.4-1.dsc
Greetings,
lame_3.98.4-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lame_3.98.4-1.dsc
lame_3.98.4-1.debian.tar.gz
lame_3.98.4-1_i386.deb
lame-doc_3.98.4-1_all.deb
libmp3lame0_3.98.4-1_i386.deb
libmp3lame-dev_3.98.4-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
