Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:59:17AM +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: > i simply see no reason to keep ardour3 around, and it has a > crasher bug (#778363) triggered by loading any MIDI file (i > think that should be raised to "important"). > >>> > >>> I would remove it.

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-09-21 10:54, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: > On 2015-09-20 11:25, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: i simply see no reason to keep ardour3 around, and it has a crasher bug (#778363) triggered by loading any MIDI file (i think that

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On 2015-09-20 11:25, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> i simply see no reason to keep ardour3 around, and it has a crasher bug >>> (#778363) triggered by loading any MIDI file (i think that should be >>> raised to "important"). >> >> I would remove it. i'd like to hear adrian on this first. > > What shou

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-09-16 12:38 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : > 2015-09-16 11:32 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) > : >> On 2015-04-19 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote: >>> >>> So here's the suggestion. Instead of >>> >>>ardour -> a2 >>>ardour3 -> a3 >>>ardour4 -> a4 >>> >>> I propose >>> >>>ardour

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-09-16 11:32 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) : > On 2015-04-19 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote: >> >> So here's the suggestion. Instead of >> >>ardour -> a2 >>ardour3 -> a3 >>ardour4 -> a4 >> >> I propose >> >>ardour -> a4 >>ardour3 -> a3 (legacy tree for jessie) >>

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On 2015-04-19 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote: > > So here's the suggestion. Instead of > >ardour -> a2 >ardour3 -> a3 >ardour4 -> a4 > > I propose > >ardour -> a4 >ardour3 -> a3 (legacy tree for jessie) >drop ardour3 after jessie+1 (what's the new codename? ;) ) > now tha

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

Quoting Jaromír Mikeš (2015-05-05 09:43:59) > W: ardour3: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig > W: ardour3: postrm-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig > > Jonas are these warning connected to this cdbs bug? > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=204975 I don't know. Maybe. - Jonas -

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-05-04 23:56 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth : > On 4 May 2015 17:04:28 GMT-04:00, "Jaromír Mikeš" > wrote: > > > Hi Adrian, > > Hi! > > >are you still working on different method of repacking? > >If you are fine with current repacking I would go forward and upload. > >Let me know pls. > > Not working

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On 4 May 2015 17:04:28 GMT-04:00, "Jaromír Mikeš" wrote: > Hi Adrian, Hi! >are you still working on different method of repacking? >If you are fine with current repacking I would go forward and upload. >Let me know pls. Not working on it for the foreseeable future. Whatever we have is good

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-23 15:07 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : > > > 2015-04-23 10:47 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth : > >> >> master >>> >>> For get-orig-source method (I want to use for repacking) is needed >>> working watch file first. >>> Is there any web interface to upstre

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-23 10:47 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth : > > master >> >> For get-orig-source method (I want to use for repacking) is needed >> working watch file first. >> Is there any web interface to upstream git to we can monitor it with >> uscan? >> > > Yes, us

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

master For get-orig-source method (I want to use for repacking) is needed working watch file first. Is there any web interface to upstream git to we can monitor it with uscan? Yes, use https://github.com/Ardour/ardour Thanks for taking care of th

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-22 16:37 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth : > > I can have a look on on repacking ... can you send me a link for >> upstream git? >> We should also add debian/watch file >> > >git://git.ardour.org/ardour/ardour.git master > For get-orig-source method (I want to use for repacking) is needed wor

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

I can have a look on on repacking ... can you send me a link for upstream git? We should also add debian/watch file git://git.ardour.org/ardour/ardour.git master Thanks for taking a look! Copyright file finished Awesome. Feel free to upload anytime you think it's ready. Cheers _

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-21 0:11 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : > > > 2015-04-20 15:49 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth : > > On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> >> How do you do repacking? Manually? >>> >> >> Sort of. I track upstream git and then drop the waf binary. I wish the >> filter statement in gbp.conf would work

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On 04/21/15 06:53, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Hi Adrian, I gave a little test to Ardour4 ... looks really great. Just one issue I can't create session connected via ALSA with JACK it works as expected. Does it work for you? Yes, works for me, even inside VMs and chroots. Cheers _

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-19 14:13 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth : > > Just wanted to let you know that I'm mostly done with packaging > ardour4.0 (released yesterday). > Hi Adrian, I gave a little test to Ardour4 ... looks really great. Just one issue I can't create session connected via ALSA with JACK it works as expe

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 16:07 GMT+02:00 Fabian Greffrath : > Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 15:49 +0200 schrieb Adrian Knoth: > > > No, I think lintian is wrong here. I have a HiDPI display (2560x1600 on > > 13" screen), and small icons are a pain. OSX (the only OS that has > > properly working HiDPI out of the bo

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 15:49 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth : On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > Great! >> >> How do you do repacking? Manually? >> > > Sort of. I track upstream git and then drop the waf binary. I wish the > filter statement in gbp.conf would work, but for some reason it doesn't. > > P: ar

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

Quoting Felipe Sateler (2015-04-20 17:06:25) > On 20 April 2015 at 11:57, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Quoting Adrian Knoth (2015-04-20 15:49:41) >>> On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: E: ardour3: menu-icon-too-big usr/share/pixmaps/ardour4.xpm: 48x48 > 32x32 Should we ship smaller ic

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On 20 April 2015 at 11:57, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Adrian Knoth (2015-04-20 15:49:41) >> On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> E: ardour3: menu-icon-too-big usr/share/pixmaps/ardour4.xpm: 48x48 > 32x32 >>> Should we ship smaller icon? >> >> No, I think lintian is wrong here. I have

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

Quoting Adrian Knoth (2015-04-20 15:49:41) > On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> E: ardour3: menu-icon-too-big usr/share/pixmaps/ardour4.xpm: 48x48 > 32x32 >> Should we ship smaller icon? > > No, I think lintian is wrong here. I have a HiDPI display (2560x1600 > on 13" screen), and small ic

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 14:36 +0200 schrieb Adrian Knoth: > On 04/20/15 13:05, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > > $ git checkout alioth/upstream-a4 > > $ git checkout -b upstream-a4 $ git fetch origin upstream-a4:upstream-a4 master-a4:master-a4 should do about the same. - Fabian

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 15:49 +0200 schrieb Adrian Knoth: > These should indeed be dropped. If you can figure out some magic to do > this automatically, that would be great. There's automatic > git-upstream-repackaging in CDBS, I've used it for jackd2, so taking a > look at jackd2's debian/rule

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On 20 April 2015 at 10:49, Adrian Knoth wrote: > On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > >> Great! >> >> How do you do repacking? Manually? > > > Sort of. I track upstream git and then drop the waf binary. I wish the > filter statement in gbp.conf would work, but for some reason it doesn't. > >>

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Great! How do you do repacking? Manually? Sort of. I track upstream git and then drop the waf binary. I wish the filter statement in gbp.conf would work, but for some reason it doesn't. P: ardour3 source: source-contains-autogenerated-visual-c++-file

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 14:36 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth : > On 04/20/15 13:05, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > $ git checkout alioth/upstream-a4 >> $ git checkout -b upstream-a4 >> > > At least my version of git doesn't require the first line. > > Now I am building new ardour ... just noticed this in build output >> >

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On 04/20/15 13:05, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: $ git checkout alioth/upstream-a4 $ git checkout -b upstream-a4 At least my version of git doesn't require the first line. Now I am building new ardour ... just noticed this in build output * Use External Libraries: False

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 12:31 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth : > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:13:17PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > > > Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš: > > > > What is wrong ? :( > > > > > > I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and > > > --git-upstre

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

Quoting Adrian Knoth (2015-04-20 11:30:50) > On 04/19/15 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote: > >> Last not least, we should probably cut down on the number of ardour >> versions in Debian. Nobody supports a2 anymore, same for a3. It's a > > Would it make sense to exclude a2 from Jessie? Removal request? >

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:13:17PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš: > > > What is wrong ? :( > > > > I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and > > --git-upstream-branch=upstream-a4 to "gbp buildpackage" to point it

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On 2015-04-20 12:13, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2015-04-20 10:30 GMT+02:00 Fabian Greffrath : > >> Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš: >>> What is wrong ? :( >> >> I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and >> --git-upstream-branch=upstream-a4 to "gbp bui

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-20 10:30 GMT+02:00 Fabian Greffrath : > Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš: > > What is wrong ? :( > > I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and > --git-upstream-branch=upstream-a4 to "gbp buildpackage" to point it to > the right branches. >

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 11:23 +0200 schrieb Adrian Knoth: > I've done that already, so it must be something else: You will have to be on the master-a4 branch already for this to take effect, which Jaromir probably wasn't. - Fabian ___ pkg-multime

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On 04/20/15 10:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: What is wrong ? :( I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and --git-upstream-branch=upstream-a4 to "gbp buildpackage" to point it to the right branches. Right. The proper thing to do is for the person choosing to use non-default

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš: > What is wrong ? :( I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and --git-upstream-branch=upstream-a4 to "gbp buildpackage" to point it to the right branches. - Fabian __

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-19 22:28 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth : On 04/19/15 19:31, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > > I'm currently building in pbuilder and will report back later. >> Amazing! I am excited to give it a try. ;) >> > > Pushed to ardour3.git now, just checkout the master-a4 and upstream-a4 > branches. > I am st

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

2015-04-19 14:13 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth : > Hi! > > Just wanted to let you know that I'm mostly done with packaging > ardour4.0 (released yesterday). > > I'm currently building in pbuilder and will report back later. > Amazing! I am excited to give it a try. ;) > Note that the package is still

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On 04/19/15 14:43, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Hi Adrian Hi! >> I propose >> >>ardour -> a4 >>ardour3 -> a3 (legacy tree for jessie) >>drop ardour3 after jessie+1 (what's the new codename? ;) ) > > Is there a reason to keep old ardour versions around? I've asked upstream about thi

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

Hi Adrian On 2015-04-19 14:13:02, Adrian Knoth wrote: > Just wanted to let you know that I'm mostly done with packaging > ardour4.0 (released yesterday). > > I'm currently building in pbuilder and will report back later. > > Note that the package is still called ardour3 with a version set to > 4