On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:48:24AM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 11/18/2010 10:18 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Looking back at the log of this discussion, I think we just need to
patch mentioned below and a DFSG tarball. Perhaps Berkhard, the
upstream author, has already included
On Nov 19, 2010, at 4:48 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2010 10:18 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Looking back at the log of this discussion, I think we just need to
patch mentioned below and a DFSG tarball. Perhaps Berkhard, the
ups
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2010 10:18 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>
> Looking back at the log of this discussion, I think we just need to
> patch mentioned below and a DFSG tarball. Perhaps Berkhard, the
> upstream author, has already included the patch and s
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Looking back at the log of this discussion, I think we just need to patch
> mentioned below and a DFSG tarball. Perhaps Berkhard, the upstream author,
> has already included the patch and stripped out the non-DFSG stuff from his
>
On Nov 18, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
I get "404 - No such project".
Yes, 'cause of I've removed it as license issues are the same, I've
just reworked the packaging.
As I remember, we just need to have a DFSG ta
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I get "404 - No such project".
Yes, 'cause of I've removed it as license issues are the same, I've
just reworked the packaging.
> As I remember, we just need to have a DFSG tarball, right?
Yes, I can prepare a DFSG-clean tarball b
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 11:42 +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> please take a look at this temporary repository and let me know what
> you think [1].
>
> Cheers.
>
> [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/gmerlin-avdecoder.git
>
I get "404 - No such project". I would really lik
Hello guys,
please take a look at this temporary repository and let me know what
you think [1].
Cheers.
[1] http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/gmerlin-avdecoder.git
--
Alessio Treglia
Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 05:10:01PM +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 10/08/2010 04:30 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
or just add the patch to debian/patches and apply at build-time...
is it allowed to fix license issues in the upstream code by applying
debian/patches?
If old upstream code
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/08/2010 04:30 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
> or just add the patch to debian/patches and apply at build-time...
>
is it allowed to fix license issues in the upstream code by applying
debian/patches?
,dfsft
IOhannes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE--
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 10:55:30 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 08.10.2010 10:34, schrieb IOhannes m zmölnig:
>> i didn't do much on the package, because i thought it would be easier if
>> we just waited for the next release that has the license issues fixed.
>> (i'm not so experienced in ex
Am 08.10.2010 10:34, schrieb IOhannes m zmölnig:
i didn't do much on the package, because i thought it would be easier if
we just waited for the next release that has the license issues fixed.
(i'm not so experienced in excluding and modifying files in the orig.tar
package, so i'd rather not)
Y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/16/2010 03:13 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
> i have submitted a patch to burkhard (and he has quickly incorporated it
> in upstream - thanks again) that does:
> - rebase lib/base64.c on a clause-3 BSD licensed version of the file
> (the new
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 15:13:39 (CEST), IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2010-08-16 13:21, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>
>>
>> As I understand it, in principle we are safe if we can ensure that
>> 4-clause BSD only affects code parts that are not compiled into any of
>> the binary code that we redis
On 2010-08-16 13:21, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>
> As I understand it, in principle we are safe if we can ensure that
> 4-clause BSD only affects code parts that are not compiled into any of
> the binary code that we redistribute.
>
> Ideal for us (and for other distributors, I guess) would be if
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:12:29AM +0200, Burkhard Plaum wrote:
hope this gets through, since I'm not subscribed.
Worked fine (not sure if strings were pulled behind the curtain)
Am 14.08.2010 23:04, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Hi Burkhard (cc public Debian multimedia team mailinglist),
I sug
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:12:29 (CEST), Burkhard Plaum wrote:
>>
>> More troublesome, but maybe also more difficult to solve, I discovered
>> that some source files are licensed as 4-clause BSD which is
>> incompatible with GPLv2.
>>
>> These are the files I found containing 4-clause BSD licensin
Hi,
hope this gets through, since I'm not subscribed.
Am 14.08.2010 23:04, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Hi Burkhard (cc public Debian multimedia team mailinglist),
I am a Debian developer and recently got involved in the maintainance of
multimedia project packaging.
During a copyright and licens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/14/2010 11:04 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi Burkhard (cc public Debian multimedia team mailinglist),
>
>
> These are the files I found containing 4-clause BSD licensing:
>
> lib/os.c (at line 93)
> include/bgav_sem.h
> lib/base64.c
>
Hi Burkhard (cc public Debian multimedia team mailinglist),
I am a Debian developer and recently got involved in the maintainance of
multimedia project packaging.
During a copyright and licensing audit I noticed an oddity of the
headers for regression tests in your gmerlin-avdecoder project:
20 matches
Mail list logo
