On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Harry Rickards wrote:
> Turns out that pgrep wasn't actually required at build, but was a
> false ./configure check. I've added a patch in Git to fix this and
> Alessio says he will upload ASAP.
>
Done.
BTW, we may save a patch by adding a build-dependency on pro
On 11 May 2010 19:16, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 17:51:26 (CEST), Harry Rickards wrote:
>
>> Does this mean we should just add procps as a build dependency? Surely
>> it should be in buildd anyway as it has a standard priority?
>
> I think so, yes.
>
Turns out that pgrep w
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 17:51:26 (CEST), Harry Rickards wrote:
> Does this mean we should just add procps as a build dependency? Surely
> it should be in buildd anyway as it has a standard priority?
I think so, yes.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
___
On Tue, May 11, 2010 18:02, Harry Rickards wrote:
> On 11 May 2010 17:00, wrote:
>> On Tue, May 11, 2010 17:27, Harry Rickards wrote:
>>> On 11 May 2010 16:22, Harry Rickards wrote:
Hi,
From https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lives I can see
that armel, hppa and b
On 11 May 2010 17:00, wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 17:27, Harry Rickards wrote:
>> On 11 May 2010 16:22, Harry Rickards wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> From https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lives I can see
>>> that armel, hppa and both kfreebsds built 1.3.3-1 fine, whereas on
>>> alpha, hu
On Tue, May 11, 2010 17:58, Harry Rickards wrote:
> On 11 May 2010 16:53, wrote:
>> On Tue, May 11, 2010 17:27, Harry Rickards wrote:
>>> On 11 May 2010 16:22, Harry Rickards wrote:
Hi,
From https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lives I can see
that armel, hppa and b
On Tue, May 11, 2010 17:27, Harry Rickards wrote:
> On 11 May 2010 16:22, Harry Rickards wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> From https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lives I can see
>> that armel, hppa and both kfreebsds built 1.3.3-1 fine, whereas on
>> alpha, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, mips, powerpc, s39
On 11 May 2010 16:53, wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 17:27, Harry Rickards wrote:
>> On 11 May 2010 16:22, Harry Rickards wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> From https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lives I can see
>>> that armel, hppa and both kfreebsds built 1.3.3-1 fine, whereas on
>>> alpha, hu
On Tue, May 11, 2010 17:27, Harry Rickards wrote:
> On 11 May 2010 16:22, Harry Rickards wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> From https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lives I can see
>> that armel, hppa and both kfreebsds built 1.3.3-1 fine, whereas on
>> alpha, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, mips, powerpc, s39
Does this mean we should just add procps as a build dependency? Surely
it should be in buildd anyway as it has a standard priority?
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: 11 May 2010 16:48
Subject: Re: LiVES 1.3.3 failing to build
To: Harry Rickards
On Tue, May 11, 2010 17:22
On 11 May 2010 16:22, Harry Rickards wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lives I can see
> that armel, hppa and both kfreebsds built 1.3.3-1 fine, whereas on
> alpha, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, mips, powerpc, s390 and sparc the build
> failed. On my local machine (i386
Hi,
>From https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lives I can see
that armel, hppa and both kfreebsds built 1.3.3-1 fine, whereas on
alpha, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, mips, powerpc, s390 and sparc the build
failed. On my local machine (i386), the Ubuntu Launchpad PPA builders
(i386, amd64 and l
12 matches
Mail list logo
