On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Romain Bouqueau
wrote:
> Hi Reinhard,
>
>>> My advise would be to focus on Libav, as FFmpeg closely tracks
>>> "upstream", and claims to ensures API/ABI compatibility. Michael
>>> Niedermayer offered repeatedly in the past to merge every development
>>> of Libav in
PS: just wrote on the libav-api mailing-list
http://lists.libav.org/pipermail/libav-api/2013-September/000741.html
Hi Reinhard,
>
> My advise would be to focus on Libav, as FFmpeg closely tracks
>>> "upstream", and claims to ensures API/ABI compatibility. Michael
>>> Niedermayer offered repeat
Hi Reinhard,
My advise would be to focus on Libav, as FFmpeg closely tracks
>> "upstream", and claims to ensures API/ABI compatibility. Michael
>> Niedermayer offered repeatedly in the past to merge every development
>> of Libav into FFmpeg, so that should solve your struggle for good.
>>
>> Feel
[keeping Rogério cc; dropping Romain now warned on posting style]
Quoting Rogério Theodoro de Brito (2013-09-26 17:49:13)
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Jonas Smedegaard
> wrote:
>> Quoting Romain Bouqueau (2013-09-25 14:23:46)
>>> We would need you to provide bot
ito at ime.usp.br.
> Quoting Romain Bouqueau (2013-09-25 14:23:46)
>> We would need you to provide both FFmpeg and libav as separate
>> packages in Debian. However the libraries/headers in the packages have
>> the same names. AFAIU this makes our request impossible to fulfill.
&
>
> My advise would be to focus on Libav, as FFmpeg closely tracks
> "upstream", and claims to ensures API/ABI compatibility. Michael
> Niedermayer offered repeatedly in the past to merge every development
> of Libav into FFmpeg, so that should solve your struggle for good.
>
> Feel free to drop by
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Romain Bouqueau
wrote:
> Dear Debian maintainers,
>
> I'm a contributor on the GPAC multimedia project. I'm writing to you because
> we spend more and more time trying to keep our project compatible with both
> FFmpeg and libav. This i
nd more and more time trying to keep our project
> compatible with both FFmpeg and libav. This is not sustainable.
I understand your pain.
> We would need you to provide both FFmpeg and libav as separate
> packages in Debian. However the libraries/headers in the packages have
> the
Dear Debian maintainers,
I'm a contributor on the GPAC multimedia project. I'm writing to you
because we spend more and more time trying to keep our project compatible
with both FFmpeg and libav. This is not sustainable.
We would need you to provide both FFmpeg and libav as separate p
