On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:36, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 08:34:38PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Since we need to advertise this list, I think we should do a Bits From
>> our team. I have started a draft in
>> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/BitsFrom, so please add
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 08:34:38PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Since we need to advertise this list, I think we should do a Bits From
> our team. I have started a draft in
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/BitsFrom, so please add
> anything you think we should be saying.
That's a really
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 18:20, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:12:47PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> > Bugreports have been mentioned as an example of inappropriate mails for
>> > such
>> > list, right? So what is then on-topic? Is it for visions and metadesign -
>> > like a
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:12:47PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > Bugreports have been mentioned as an example of inappropriate mails for such
> > list, right? So what is then on-topic? Is it for visions and metadesign -
> > like a multimedia-specific d-project@ ? Or is it more of a
> > d-user-
Hi all,
shortly:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> 1. Mailing list
> I suggested to use debian-multime...@lists.debian.org as general
> discussion list (for instance for discussion like this) for a Debian
> Multimedia Blend and for an entry point of users to ta
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 19:58, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 02:16:12PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:51, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>>
>>> 1. Mailing list
>>> I suggested to use debian-multime...@lists.debian.org as general
>>> discussion list
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 02:16:12PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:51, Andreas Tille wrote:
1. Mailing list
I suggested to use debian-multime...@lists.debian.org as general
discussion list (for instance for discussion like this) for a
Debian Multimedia Ble
[Quick answere from Hotel in Sevillia]
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 02:16:12PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
> I apologise again for having forgotten about this discussion.
No problem - thanks for taking action now.
> > potential Multimedia Blend - just agree upon a fieldname (UpstreamDoc
> > come
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:51, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to come back to a thread about a Multimedia Blend which was
> started in August this year[1]. There was some discussion but no obvios
> action. Yesterday I was able to do at least a bit of action *I* feel
> able to do (and
Hi,
I'm trying to come back to a thread about a Multimedia Blend which was
started in August this year[1]. There was some discussion but no obvios
action. Yesterday I was able to do at least a bit of action *I* feel
able to do (and I do not feel able for the other parts). I try to
remember you
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:01:30PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
> Well, the most obvious pieces of information missing are a) what version
> of the package is included in lenny and squeeze, and b) link to the
> package documentation.
Do you mean the information is missing on the long list[1]
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:14:06 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:18:47AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Reinhard Tartler
>> wrote:
>> > I particularily like
>> > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Applications, which is
>>
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:18:47AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Reinhard Tartler
> wrote:
> > I particularily like
> > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Applications, which is
> > linked from the PackageList page!
> >
>
> We should write a simila
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> I particularily like
> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Applications, which is
> linked from the PackageList page!
>
We should write a similar page for summarize all available applications.
--
Alessio Treglia
Debian & Ub
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:18:32PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 18/08/10 15:57, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
But what we could do is to identify user tasks. Then, instead of
providing metapackages or tasksel files, we list all applications in
debian that can fulfill the purpose of that task, and
On 18/08/10 15:57, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 19:42:19 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> So, what are interesting multimedia tasks? I'm thinking:
>>
>> * audio production: sound synthesis, audio editing, sequencing.
>
> Does it makes sense to have each application installe
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 18:29:39 (CEST), Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Andreas Marschke
> wrote:
Or should we have a finer grained split?
>> See element the Ubuntu based distro:
>> http://www.elementmypc.com/
>> I think if you do a blend lets make it so people
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 19:42:19 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
> So, what are interesting multimedia tasks? I'm thinking:
>
> * audio production: sound synthesis, audio editing, sequencing.
Does it makes sense to have each application installed?
> * multimedia playing: vlc ;)
While I think vlc
On 18/08/10 12:56, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:42:19PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> So, what are interesting multimedia tasks? I'm thinking:
>>
>> * audio production: sound synthesis, audio editing, sequencing.
>> * multimedia playing: vlc ;)
>> * video production: ... I
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:42:19PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
So, what are interesting multimedia tasks? I'm thinking:
* audio production: sound synthesis, audio editing, sequencing.
* multimedia playing: vlc ;)
* video production: ... I don't do this.
* home multimedia center: xmbc/mediatomb
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Andreas Marschke
wrote:
>>> Or should we have a finer grained split?
> See element the Ubuntu based distro:
> http://www.elementmypc.com/
> I think if you do a blend lets make it so people like them can get attracted
> to it.
We may get and adapt some ideas fr
Hi felipe and team,
No there really wasn't any reason. I'm awfully sorry :).
Thats what happens when you try a different mail-client.
For the rest this time(I hope this works):
>> * audio production: sound synthesis, audio editing, sequencing.
>> * multimedia playing: vlc ;)
** Video: miro
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:19:21PM -0500, Romain Beauxis wrote:
Le mardi 17 août 2010 13:44:01, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>Or should we have a finer grained split?
I imagine something like this:
* multimedia-gtk (enhancing e.g. gnome)
* multimedia-qt (enhances e.g. kde)
* multimedia-lig
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:52:56AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 17.08.2010 23:54, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
* multimedia-gnome (provides multimedia-playback; depends on
Qt/Phonon-based and KDE apps)
That's most probably wrong!
Yeah, silly me - you know what I meant.
- Jonas
--
* Jo
Am 17.08.2010 23:54, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
* multimedia-gnome (provides multimedia-playback; depends on
Qt/Phonon-based and KDE apps)
That's most probably wrong!
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.
Le mardi 17 août 2010 13:44:01, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> >Or should we have a finer grained split?
>
> I imagine something like this:
>
> * multimedia-gtk (enhancing e.g. gnome)
> * multimedia-qt (enhances e.g. kde)
> * multimedia-light (enhances e.g. lxde and xfce)
> * multimedia-tin
Am Dienstag, den 17.08.2010, 13:42 -0400 schrieb Felipe Sateler:
> * home multimedia center: xmbc/mediatomb style software.
I'd suggest to distinguish between client and server tasks for software
that is typically used in homes/families.
There's typically one or more client machines that have to d
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:17:18PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 17/08/10 17:54, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
* multimedia (depends on multimedia-gtk | multimedia-playback)
* multimedia-gnome (provides multimedia-playback; depends on
Qt/Phonon-based and KDE apps)
* multimedia-gtk (provides mu
On 17/08/10 17:54, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:09:12PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 08:44:01PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>
* audio production: sound synthesis, audio editing, sequencing.
* multimedia playing: vlc ;)
* video prod
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:09:12PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 08:44:01PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
* audio production: sound synthesis, audio editing, sequencing.
* multimedia playing: vlc ;)
* video production: ... I don't do this.
* home multimedia center: xmbc/me
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 08:44:01PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> * audio production: sound synthesis, audio editing, sequencing.
>> * multimedia playing: vlc ;)
>> * video production: ... I don't do this.
>> * home multimedia center: xmbc/mediatomb style software.
>>
>> Or should we have a fin
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:42:19PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
So, what are interesting multimedia tasks? I'm thinking:
* audio production: sound synthesis, audio editing, sequencing.
* multimedia playing: vlc ;)
* video production: ... I don't do this.
* home multimedia center: xmbc/mediatomb
So, what are interesting multimedia tasks? I'm thinking:
* audio production: sound synthesis, audio editing, sequencing.
* multimedia playing: vlc ;)
* video production: ... I don't do this.
* home multimedia center: xmbc/mediatomb style software.
Or should we have a finer grained split?
--
Sal
33 matches
Mail list logo
