Re: Change from audio group to something else

2014-10-31 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014, at 01:45 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Hi Kaj, > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > I think I was able to figure out pretty much all about how the cgroups > > tools and configs work (and what is possible), however, I never got > > realtime scheduling t

Re: Change from audio group to something else

2014-10-28 Thread Felipe Sateler
Hi Kaj, On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > I think I was able to figure out pretty much all about how the cgroups > tools and configs work (and what is possible), however, I never got > realtime scheduling to work Not sure why. Compiled a kernel with > CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED on

Re: Change from audio group to something else

2014-10-27 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
I think I was able to figure out pretty much all about how the cgroups tools and configs work (and what is possible), however, I never got realtime scheduling to work Not sure why. Compiled a kernel with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED on (which apparently is turned off nowadays), which I believe is necessar

Re: Change from audio group to something else

2014-10-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Kaj Ailomaa (2014-10-26 23:39:38) > > > On Sun, Oct 26, 2014, at 11:14 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Not sure if you still consider use of classic POSIX group for this, >> just renaing to be another than audio. If you do, then let me try >> again to explain my point: >> >> The Ubuntu

Re: Change from audio group to something else

2014-10-26 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014, at 11:14 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Not sure if you still consider use of classic POSIX group for this, just > renaing to be another than audio. If you do, then let me try again to > explain my point: > > The Ubuntu wiki page mentions the reason for avoiding static Au

Re: Change from audio group to something else

2014-10-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Kaj Ailomaa (2014-10-26 22:27:33) > On Sun, Oct 26, 2014, at 09:32 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Seems to me that goal of >> is to move from POSIX >> groups to dynamically allocated access rights. >> >> Would it perhaps be possible and better

Re: Change from audio group to something else

2014-10-26 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014, at 09:32 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Seems to me that goal of > is to move from POSIX groups to dynamically allocated access rights. > > Would it perhaps be possible and better to similarly allocate the right > to realtime priv

Re: Change from audio group to something else

2014-10-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Kaj Ailomaa (2014-10-26 21:29:40) > The bug got closed before I had the time to blink, so I'm taking the > discussion to debian-devel list. Yeah, I you might know I am no Ubuntu fan, but that bug closure seems rude (even) to me: As I read it, you only _support_ your point by referencing

Re: Change from audio group to something else

2014-10-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Kaj, Quoting Kaj Ailomaa (2014-10-26 21:07:17) > I just reported a bug on the usage of audio group. bug #766914 > > As it seems to be considered a bad group for users to belong to, and > the fact that jackd packages expects the users to be apart of it, I > propose to remove audio as a user d

Re: Change from audio group to something else

2014-10-26 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
The bug got closed before I had the time to blink, so I'm taking the discussion to debian-devel list. On Sun, Oct 26, 2014, at 09:07 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > I just reported a bug on the usage of audio group. bug #766914 > > As it seems to be considered a bad group for users to belong to, and the

Change from audio group to something else

2014-10-26 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
I just reported a bug on the usage of audio group. bug #766914 As it seems to be considered a bad group for users to belong to, and the fact that jackd packages expects the users to be apart of it, I propose to remove audio as a user default and create a new group for jack specifically. ffado als