Hi Rémi,
On 19.01.2016 20:53, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 January 2016 20:32:50 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> Why did you not disable frame-threading when using hwaccel, as the ffmpeg
>> commit message suggests?
>
> I don´t think that it would be that easy at all on VLC side, without
Hello,
On Tuesday 19 January 2016 20:32:50 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> > But at this point, this is moot for the purpose of this bug report. FFmpeg
> > 2.9 breaks compatibility with VLC regardless of versions. For the time
> > being, if you want something more recent than FFmpeg 2.8, you ne
Hi Rémi,
On 18.01.2016 21:37, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> On Friday 08 January 2016 01:01:05 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> The next version of FFmpeg is planned to be released this month
>> (and it might be called 3.0 instead of 2.9).
>>
>> What are the current release plans for VLC 3.0?
>
> They
Hello,
On Friday 08 January 2016 01:01:05 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> The next version of FFmpeg is planned to be released this month
> (and it might be called 3.0 instead of 2.9).
>
> What are the current release plans for VLC 3.0?
They are unchanged. VLC releases always slips by several
On 09.11.2015 19:44, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On 09 Nov, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote :
>>> So, if you want a recent ffmpeg with VLC, you need 3.0.
>>
>> Is there an estimated release date for VLC 3.0?
>
> In a month or two, for freeze.
The next version of FFmpeg is planned to be released this mon
On 09.11.2015 19:44, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On 09 Nov, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote :
>>> So, if you want a recent ffmpeg with VLC, you need 3.0.
>>
>> Is there an estimated release date for VLC 3.0?
>
> In a month or two, for freeze.
OK, so it might be an option to package a git snapshot, if vl
On 09 Nov, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote :
> > So, if you want a recent ffmpeg with VLC, you need 3.0.
>
> Is there an estimated release date for VLC 3.0?
In a month or two, for freeze.
With my kindest regards,
--
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734
Sent from my Electronic
Hi,
On 08.11.2015 23:13, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On 08 Nov, Sebastian Ramacher wrote :
>> Thanks for the patch. But this is already fixed for 3.0 and I'd rather take
>> the
>> upstream fix to keep the diff minimal. The relevant commits seem to be:
>>
>> 5707f03f17980d294cda103892d80d76458dae
On 08 Nov, Sebastian Ramacher wrote :
> Thanks for the patch. But this is already fixed for 3.0 and I'd rather take
> the
> upstream fix to keep the diff minimal. The relevant commits seem to be:
>
> 5707f03f17980d294cda103892d80d76458dae05
> 5f91febe28de339a41b450054f9e6d240d23a8a8
> cdf35ce011a
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - patch
Bug #803868 [vlc] vlc: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9
Removed tag(s) patch.
> tags -1 + fixed-upstream
Bug #803868 [vlc] vlc: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
--
803868: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803868
Debian Bug Tra
Control: tags -1 - patch
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream
Hi
On 2015-11-02 22:08:57, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Package: vlc
> Version: 2.2.1-5
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> User: pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: ffmpeg2.9
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> your pac
Package: vlc
Version: 2.2.1-5
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ffmpeg2.9
Dear Maintainer,
your package fails to build with the upcoming ffmpeg 2.9.
This bug will become release-critical at some point when the
ffmpeg2.9 transition g
12 matches
Mail list logo
