On 25 August 2015 at 04:00, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 at 13:22:49 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Sndobj requires a transition. Renamed package has been uploaded to
>> experimental and is in NEW.
>
> Since sndobj does not appear to build-depend on any libraries that need a
> tran
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 at 13:22:49 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Sndobj requires a transition. Renamed package has been uploaded to
> experimental and is in NEW.
Since sndobj does not appear to build-depend on any libraries that need a
transition, I believe it can be uploaded to unstable any time.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
fsate...@debian.org).
> usertag 791290 + transition
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: transition.
> block 791290 by 790756
Bug #79
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 791290 + transition
block 791290 by 790756
reassign 791290 release.debian.org
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:14:24 + Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:sndobj
> Version: 2.6.6.1-3
> Severity: important
> Tags: sid stretch
> User: debian-...@lists.
Package: src:sndobj
Version: 2.6.6.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: sid stretch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11
Background [1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the
C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries.
Packages which are built
