[Fabian Greffrath]
> Again, this issue isn't *so* severe that it would justify a FTBFS. I
> don't understand why you do not simply strip "-Werror" off the CFLAGS?
It is a question of code quality. For some of us, ensuring the code
build without any warning is a mean to raise the quality of the co
Am Sonntag, den 28.06.2015, 13:23 +0200 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
>
> bs1770gain.c: In function 'main':
> bs1770gain.c:647:5: error: format '%ld' expects argument of type
> 'long int', but argument 3 has type 'clock_t' [-Werror=format=]
> fprintf(stderr, "Duration: %ld ms.\n",(t2
> -t1)/C
Many thanks.
On 28.06.2015 13:23, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Based on the information available from
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1083142/what-s-the-correct-way-to-use-printf-to-print-a-clock-t
>,
refering to
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/sys/types.h.html >
where
Package: bs1770gain
Version: 0.4.5-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I noticed a build failure on the non-official x32 architecture, build
log available from
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=bs1770gain&arch=x32&ver=0.4.5-1&stamp=1435292575
>.
The build fail like this:
bs1770g
