On 18/06/14 04:07 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
>
> On 2014-06-18 09:28:10, Henri Salo wrote:
>> Do you have any more information about this? It is quite hard to fix security
>> vulnerability without any details.
> CCing the submitter so he can answer the question.
Le 2014-06-18 14:28, Henri Salo a écrit :
Do you have any more information about this? It is quite hard to fix
security
vulnerability without any details.
The Mozilla foundation writes code for an alternate reality where the
version number of the VLC NPAPI plugin and the (Lib)VLC run-time hav
Control: severity -1 important
On 2014-06-18 09:28:10, Henri Salo wrote:
> Do you have any more information about this? It is quite hard to fix security
> vulnerability without any details.
CCing the submitter so he can answer the question.
I'm also lowering the serverity. With the current infor
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #751940 [mozilla-plugin-vlc] mozilla-plugin-vlc: Iceweasel/firefox reports
vlc plugin is insecurity and should be disabled
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 751940 to the same value.
--
751940: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #751940 [mozilla-plugin-vlc] mozilla-plugin-vlc: Iceweasel/firefox reports
vlc plugin is insecurity and should be disabled
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
751940: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751940
Debia
Do you have any more information about this? It is quite hard to fix security
vulnerability without any details.
---
Henri Salo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.al
