Your patch seems to fix the issue.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_variable#Definition.2C_declaration_and_the_extern_keyword
# Han
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 665974 patch upstream
Bug #665974 [libmpcdec6] moc: does not play .mpc files with 'Error in the
stream!' message
Bug #665753 [libmpcdec6] libmpcdec6: musepack files cannot be played with
libmpcdec6 from testing/unstable
Bug #678113 [libmpcd
tags 665974 patch upstream
thanks
Am Mittwoch, den 20.06.2012, 16:47 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
> 1) Could you check if it works with the latest SVN snapshot of libmpc:
> svn co http://svn.musepack.net/libmpc
>
> 2) Could you provide an example sound file somewhere? I do not have
> one myse
Am 20.06.2012 11:07, schrieb Han Boetes:
With "CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat
-Werror=format-security"
it fails and with "CFLAGS=-g -O2" it works fine indeed.
1) Could you check if it works with the latest SVN snapshot of libmpc:
svn co http://svn.musepack.ne
With "CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat
-Werror=format-security"
it fails and with "CFLAGS=-g -O2" it works fine indeed.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
ht
Am 20.06.2012 10:09, schrieb Han Boetes:
Most certainly. With only the CFLAGS cleared the library still works,
just like you suspected.
So it seems to choke on the stack-protector...
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-mainta
On 20-06-12 09:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 19.06.2012 17:57, schrieb Han Boetes:
> Alright. Since I consider CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS quite harmless, could you
> please leave them as they are and rebuild another time with only CFLAGS
> reset to an empty string?
Most certainly. With only the CFLAG
Am 19.06.2012 17:57, schrieb Han Boetes:
That is exactly the difference between a working and a non-working
binary. You're on the right track.
Alright. Since I consider CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS quite harmless, could
you please leave them as they are and rebuild another time with only
CFLAGS reset
That is exactly the difference between a working and a non-working
binary. You're on the right track.
I've repeated the buildprocess twice so that the only diffence is the
proposed flag changes.
# Han
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pk
Am 13.06.2012 23:23, schrieb Han Boetes:
So if there is a difference between the two packages it should be in
this diff.
[...]
--- libmpc_0.1~r459-1/compat2010-05-31 16:25:23.0 +0200
+++ libmpc_0.1~r459-2/compat2012-02-14 23:27:59.0 +0100
@@ -1 +1 @@
-7
+9
This change
So if there is a difference between the two packages it should be in
this diff.
And when looking at it: the differences in libmpcdec6.install... Does it
really mean the installed binaries are the ones found in /usr/lib rather
than in the fake installation directory?
diff -upwr libmpc_0.1~r459-1/
11 matches
Mail list logo