On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 20:59 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Coming back to the libjack binNMUs:
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 18:25:15 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> > - freej: waiting for opencv, which started an uncoordinated transition
> > and FTBFS on hppa
[..]
> So as far as squeeze is co
Hi,
On Thu Sep 02, 2010 at 19:06:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > #4 (on schroeder): sigill in gcc
can you please try to compile it with -O0 on schroeder?
--
Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
Public
On 02/09/10 14:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 09:40 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 01/09/10 04:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>> this package has been tried four times and every time we see a different
>>> build error:
>>>
>>> #1 (on lebrun):segfault in gcc
>>> #2 (on sch
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 09:40 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 01/09/10 04:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > this package has been tried four times and every time we see a different
> > build error:
> >
> > #1 (on lebrun):segfault in gcc
> > #2 (on schroeder): segfault in python (i.e. scons, the
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 13:10 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, September 1, 2010 10:05, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 10:51:31 (CEST), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >> libcsound64-5.2 depends on "libjack0 (>= 0.118.0)".
> >
> > Right, could you schedule a binNMU for csound on
On 01/09/10 04:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 21:14:05 (CEST), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
>> csound still has an outdated dependency on hppa;
>
> What dependency is that? Where can we look that up?
>
>> the newer package in unstable FTBFS on sparc.
>
> this package has been
On Wed, September 1, 2010 10:05, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 10:51:31 (CEST), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
>> On Wed, September 1, 2010 09:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 21:14:05 (CEST), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>>
csound still has an outdated dependen
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 10:51:31 (CEST), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, September 1, 2010 09:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 21:14:05 (CEST), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>
>>> csound still has an outdated dependency on hppa;
>>
>> What dependency is that?
>
> libcsound64-5.2 d
On Wed, September 1, 2010 09:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 21:14:05 (CEST), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
>> csound still has an outdated dependency on hppa;
>
> What dependency is that?
libcsound64-5.2 depends on "libjack0 (>= 0.118.0)".
> Where can we look that up?
Predictab
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 21:14:05 (CEST), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> csound still has an outdated dependency on hppa;
What dependency is that? Where can we look that up?
> the newer package in unstable FTBFS on sparc.
this package has been tried four times and every time we see a different
build e
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 20:59 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Coming back to the libjack binNMUs:
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 18:25:15 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > Looking at unstable and ignoring packages which have built successfully
> > and are simply missing uploads, the remaining package
Coming back to the libjack binNMUs:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 18:25:15 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Looking at unstable and ignoring packages which have built successfully
> and are simply missing uploads, the remaining packages depending on just
> libjack0 are:
>
> - ardour: FTBFS on sparc (#5
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:36:49PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 04/08/10 11:46, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:51:12AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 03/08/10 17:50, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 17:31:05 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
This doesn't seem to
On 04/08/10 11:46, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:51:12AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 03/08/10 17:50, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 17:31:05 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>
This doesn't seem to help (I called dpkg-buildpackage -B and doxygen
>>
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:51:12AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 03/08/10 17:50, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 17:31:05 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
This doesn't seem to help (I called dpkg-buildpackage -B and doxygen
was called). How will dh_listpackages know if we called
d
On 03/08/10 17:50, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 17:31:05 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> This doesn't seem to help (I called dpkg-buildpackage -B and doxygen was
>> called). How will dh_listpackages know if we called dpkg-buildpackage -B?
>>
> In 'build', it doesn't. If you w
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 17:31:05 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> This doesn't seem to help (I called dpkg-buildpackage -B and doxygen was
> called). How will dh_listpackages know if we called dpkg-buildpackage -B?
>
In 'build', it doesn't. If you want to do something only if arch-indep
packages a
On 03/08/10 16:09, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 19:23:59 (EDT), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On 02/08/10 18:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On Sun, August 1, 2010 12:33, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Copying this to the appropriate bug...
>>> [...]
Indeed. How do you suggest wo
On 03/08/10 00:26, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 19:23:59 (EDT), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On 02/08/10 18:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On Sun, August 1, 2010 12:33, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Copying this to the appropriate bug...
>>> [...]
Indeed. How do you suggest wo
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 19:23:59 (EDT), Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 02/08/10 18:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Sun, August 1, 2010 12:33, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> Copying this to the appropriate bug...
>> [...]
>>> Indeed. How do you suggest working through this? Facts:
>>>
>>> 1. The build hang
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 19:23:59 (EDT), Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 02/08/10 18:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Sun, August 1, 2010 12:33, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> Copying this to the appropriate bug...
>> [...]
>>> Indeed. How do you suggest working through this? Facts:
>>>
>>> 1. The build hang
On 02/08/10 18:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, August 1, 2010 12:33, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Copying this to the appropriate bug...
> [...]
>> Indeed. How do you suggest working through this? Facts:
>>
>> 1. The build hangs unpredictably on a doxygen call.
>> 2. The doxygen call is in build-i
On Sun, August 1, 2010 12:33, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Copying this to the appropriate bug...
[...]
> Indeed. How do you suggest working through this? Facts:
>
> 1. The build hangs unpredictably on a doxygen call.
> 2. The doxygen call is in build-indep (so it is not strictly necessary
> for binary
Copying this to the appropriate bug...
On 01/08/10 11:38, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, July 30, 2010 19:02, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 30/07/10 13:25, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> - ardour: FTBFS on sparc (#590863)
>>> - csound: FTBFS on hppa (#590948)
>>> - slv2: FTBFS on hppa (#590976)
>>
>>
On Fri, July 30, 2010 19:02, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 30/07/10 13:25, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> - ardour: FTBFS on sparc (#590863)
>> - csound: FTBFS on hppa (#590948)
>> - slv2: FTBFS on hppa (#590976)
>
> All these three look like problems with the buildd host/toolchain.
> CSound hangs in a dox
On 30/07/10 13:25, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 22:30 +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>> It works (on the library level), but the packages need to depend on the
>> newly introduced virtual package libjack-0.116 which is provided by
>> either libjack0 or libjack-jackd2-0.
>>
>> (to be
[Adam D. Barratt]
> On the subject of those binNMUs, they should now all have been
> scheduled.
I hope the transition will be finished soon. Debian Edu is badly
affected by it, as we want both jackd, hydrogen and lmms installed.
At the moment in unstable, d-i/tasksel/aptitude is unable to install
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 22:30 +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> It works (on the library level), but the packages need to depend on the
> newly introduced virtual package libjack-0.116 which is provided by
> either libjack0 or libjack-jackd2-0.
>
> (to be precise, they'll depend on (libjack-jackd2-0 | l
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 05:13:23PM +0100, Pedro Ribeiro wrote:
> > Yes, that's why we want to ship it as default jackd flavor in squeeze.
> > However, we discovered that squeeze is better off with both jackd1 and
> > jackd2 versions, and have applications compiled against libjack0 from
> > the jac
>> I don't want to downgrade to jackd2.
>
> This doesn't make sense. I assume that you meant jackd1 here.
>
Yes, that's what I meant.
> Yes, that's why we want to ship it as default jackd flavor in squeeze.
> However, we discovered that squeeze is better off with both jackd1 and
> jackd2 versions
reassign 589689 release.debian.org
stop
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 01:23:27 (CEST), Pedro R wrote:
> Package: jackd2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hi,
>
> the recent transition to jackd2 causes a mess in my system.
Yes, that is sort-of expected.
> I do
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 589689 release.debian.org
Bug #589689 [jackd2] transition to libjack-jackd2-0 breaks many packages
Bug reassigned from package 'jackd2' to 'release.debian.org'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
-
Package: jackd2
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
the recent transition to jackd2 causes a mess in my system.
I don't want to downgrade to jackd2. After being forced to use it for a couple
of months, I find it is
much more reliable.
If I try to install jackd2
33 matches
Mail list logo
