On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 07:57:05PM +0200, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:32:49AM +0200, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> > I'll prepare a patch that gets everything into the form recommended by GNU
> > and ask upstream (Rohan) to apply it.
>
> As promised, submitted the attached patch
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> In the mean time, anything else I can do to get the package in shape for
> sponsorship?
We should wait for a response from upstream first.
--
Alessio Treglia
Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
0FEC 59A5 E
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:32:49AM +0200, Arnout Engelen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:34:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 14:44:08 (CEST), Arnout Engelen wrote:
> Right - the README does contain a copyright line, states it's GPL
> and links to gnu.org As for not
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:34:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 14:44:08 (CEST), Arnout Engelen wrote:
> > Right - the README does contain a copyright line, states it's GPL and
> > links to gnu.org
> > As for not including the GPL license text, is that a problem?
>
> Y
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 14:44:08 (CEST), Arnout Engelen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 02:57:57PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
>> I've been doing some work on the package, license information seems
>> missing in the sources.
>> Plus, no license is provided with the original tarball.
>
> Right -
Hi Arnout,
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> As for not including the GPL license text, is that a problem?
this is the real problem.
Upstream's tarball *must* provide a copy of the license.
--
Alessio Treglia
Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreg
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 02:57:57PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> I've been doing some work on the package, license information seems
> missing in the sources.
> Plus, no license is provided with the original tarball.
Right - the README does contain a copyright line, states it's GPL and links to
I've been doing some work on the package, license information seems
missing in the sources.
Plus, no license is provided with the original tarball.
ales...@quadromatic:~/Documenti/devel/debian/git/pkg-multimedia/jack-tools$
licensecheck --copyright -r .
./jack.udp.c: UNKNOWN
[Copyright: rohan dr
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:13:31AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> > Could you add me to the alioth project so I can check them into git there?
>
> Done, welcome aboard!
Thanks! First version has been uploaded, I'd love to hear your feedba
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> Could you add me to the alioth project so I can check them into git there?
>
Done, welcome aboard!
--
Alessio Treglia
Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:40:44PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> > On the other hand it makes sense to have debian-multimedia packages in a
> > consistent format, so perhaps it'd be best to maintain this package outside
> > of
> > debian-multimedia? What do you think?
>
> IMHO quality increases
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:01:56PM +0200, Arnout Engelen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:43:51PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:40:44PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> Anyway, we could use both:
> - git to store the packaging
> - darcs to retrieve the original tarball,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:43:51PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:40:44PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> > Anyway, we could use both:
> > - git to store the packaging
> > - darcs to retrieve the original tarball, for example by putting a
> > get-orig-source target in deb
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:40:44PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> Anyway, we could use both:
>
> - git to store the packaging
> - darcs to retrieve the original tarball, for example by putting a
> get-orig-source target in debian/rules
Sounds great. Last time I had a look at jack-tools, it co
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> Hmm, in this case it seems elegant to stick to Darcs, as upstream doesn't do
> releases and this way we can leave generating the .orig.tar.gz to
> darcs-buildpackage (http://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithDarcs).
I'm not confident with Darcs
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:21:29AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> sorry for the delay.
No problem at all!
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> > Darcs:
> > -
> > http://darcs.debian.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=collab-maint/jack-tools;a=summary
> > Mentors:
> > - URL: http:
Hello Arnout,
sorry for the delay.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> Darcs:
> -
> http://darcs.debian.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=collab-maint/jack-tools;a=summary
> Mentors:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jack-tools
> - Source repository: deb-src ht
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 03:53:19PM +0200, Arnout Engelen wrote:
> I noticed jack-tools is orphaned, and could really use an update. For example,
> jack.play has been transport-aware for more than 3 years, and that didn't make
> it into Debian yet.
>
> Perhaps this package could be adopted by someo
Hi,
I noticed jack-tools is orphaned, and could really use an update. For example,
jack.play has been transport-aware for more than 3 years, and that didn't make
it into Debian yet.
Perhaps this package could be adopted by someone in the debian-multimedia team?
Kind regards,
Arnout
__
19 matches
Mail list logo
