On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> All of this is just my personal interpretation: Please run it by the
> debian-legal@ mailinglist to get a more authoritative answer.
For now, I've mailed upstream about this issue and I'm waiting for a
reply from him.
As usual, thanks for
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 09:42:20AM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
It might very well be true that those files have no copyright
holders, but who then licensed them as GPL-2+?!?
The answer is: I don't know :)
But the COPYING file provided
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> It might very well be true that those files have no copyright holders, but
> who then licensed them as GPL-2+?!?
The answer is: I don't know :)
But the COPYING file provided with the tarball and other sources say
GPL-2 and then, since dis
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 01:42:46AM +, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
Files in ./doc/examples/* have no copyright holders.
+
+Files: ./doc/examples/*
+Copyright: No copyright holder
+License: GPL-2+
+
It might very well be true that those files have no copyright holders,
but w
