Bug#702762: Fwd: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-09 Thread Reinhard Tartler
There seems to be at least some activity here. Maybe we can update the Debian libpostproc package to Michael's new branch. Derek, just to clarify since you worked on the branch the package is currently based on: What are your thoughts on this? Are you interested in continuing this effort? What wo

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-08 Thread Nicolas George
Le duodi 22 fructidor, an CCXXII, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : > May I ask out of curiosity, what in FFmpeg actually uses libpostproc > other than than libavfilter/vf_pp.c? You said that you prefer to > maintain libpostproc inside FFmpeg because that way you can apply the > FFmpeg test system on it.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-08 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 08:13:48AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:18:57AM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote: > >> On 05.09.2014, at 03:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > >> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-08 Thread Clément Bœsch
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 08:13:48AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: [..] > May I ask out of curiosity, what in FFmpeg actually uses libpostproc > other than than libavfilter/vf_pp.c? You said that you prefer to > maintain libpostproc inside FFmpeg because that way you can apply the > FFmpeg test syst

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-08 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:18:57AM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote: >> On 05.09.2014, at 03:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer >> > wrote: >> >>> At the end of the day, I need a source t

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-07 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:18:57AM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote: > On 05.09.2014, at 03:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer > > wrote: > >>> At the end of the day, I need a source tarball that contains > >>> maintained sources of a stand-alone lib

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-04 Thread Reimar Döffinger
On 05.09.2014, at 03:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>> At the end of the day, I need a source tarball that contains >>> maintained sources of a stand-alone libpostproc. I don't care too much >>> how it is created, as long as it doesn't re

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-04 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> At the end of the day, I need a source tarball that contains >> maintained sources of a stand-alone libpostproc. I don't care too much >> how it is created, as long as it doesn't result in code-duplication >> with existing sources in De

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-04 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 07:42:00PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi Reinhard > > > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:33:48PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer > >> wrote: > >> > On

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-04 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi Reinhard > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:33:48PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 3,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-04 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi Reinhard On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:33:48PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer > >> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Se

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-03 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> as discussed in

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-03 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port > >> libpostproc (the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc

2014-09-03 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> Hi, >> >> as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port >> libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not >> test it (for lack of a stand-al