Re: review qemplayer

2012-07-14 Thread wbrana
new version 12.6 was uploaded. It is split into 2 packages. http://mentors.debian.net/package/qemplayer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: review qemplayer

2012-07-11 Thread wbrana
On 7/11/12, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:11 PM, wbrana wrote: >> mplayer_nice is key feature of qemplayer. >> Realtime I/O priority for MPlayer is needed when some other >> application is fully loading hard drive. >> It prevents empty buffer in

Re: review qemplayer

2012-07-11 Thread wbrana
> btw, why do you need mplayer_nice in the first place? > afaiu, qemplayer is an qt frontend to mplayer, and does not need > realtime I/O priorities any more than mplayer itself. mplayer_nice is key feature of qemplayer. Realtime I/O priority for MPlayer is needed when some other application is ful

Re: review qemplayer

2012-07-10 Thread wbrana
On 7/9/12, wbrana wrote: > I managed temporary to change limits from command line, but I/O > priority can't be increased > x@debian:~$ mplayer_nice > cant set I/O priority > MPlayer svn r34540 (Debian), built with gcc-4.7 (C) 2000-2012 MPlayer Team > I sub

Re: review qemplayer

2012-07-09 Thread wbrana
I managed temporary to change limits from command line, but I/O priority can't be increased x@debian:~$ su - Password: root@debian:~# ulimit -e unlimited root@debian:~# ulimit -r unlimited root@debian:~# su - x x@debian:~$ ulimit -a core file size (blocks, -c) 0 data seg size (kb

Re: review qemplayer

2012-07-09 Thread wbrana
I added following lines to /etc/security/limits.conf and rebooted @audio softnice-20 @audio softrtprio unlimited but it doesn't work id uid=1000(x) gid=1000(x) groups=1000(x),24(cdrom),25(floppy),29(audio),30(dip),44(video),46(plugdev) nice -n-20 ls nice: cannot s

review qemplayer

2012-07-09 Thread wbrana
> is it possible for you to "reply" to messages, so threads are kept intact? > also it would be nice if you could use a more meaningful subject ("my" > package refer to a number of packages, non of which is qemplayer) I can't reply to messages because I'm not subscribed to mailing list because I do

Please review my package

2012-07-05 Thread wbrana
> That doesn't change that it is a security hazard! > Don't run user apps as root! > Don't implement super-user features in user apps - implement it > separately, and make it optional to use it. I don't run user apps as root. MPlayer is never started as root. Here is mplayer_nice source code with

Please review my package

2012-07-05 Thread wbrana
> - - why are you setting setuid permissions in the postinst script? > this is a security hazard (and if you do it to gain realtime > priviliges, then it is no-longer needed and deprecated for a while, in > favour of pam_limits) According to http://linux.die.net/man/5/limits.conf it is possible to

Please review my package

2012-07-05 Thread wbrana
I fixed most things and updated mentor's repository. Please check. > - - the version is "12.5-1.1", indicating a non-maintainer upload (which > you also state in the changelog). > even though you are not an official "Debian Maintainer", you (or d-m-m > as a team) is "the maintainer" of the package

Re: Please review my package

2012-07-05 Thread wbrana
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:23 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > maybe i missed that bit, but i think it would be polite if you > introduced yourself and expressed your willingness to work with p-m-m > as a team, before throwing a dry review-request on us, without even > caring to explain what that p

Please review my package

2012-07-05 Thread wbrana
Hello, I have created package for qemplayer http://mentors.debian.net/package/qemplayer ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-