PS: just wrote on the libav-api mailing-list
http://lists.libav.org/pipermail/libav-api/2013-September/000741.html
Hi Reinhard,
>
> My advise would be to focus on Libav, as FFmpeg closely tracks
>>> "upstream", and claims to ensures API/ABI compatibility. Michael
>>> Niedermayer offered repeat
Hi Reinhard,
My advise would be to focus on Libav, as FFmpeg closely tracks
>> "upstream", and claims to ensures API/ABI compatibility. Michael
>> Niedermayer offered repeatedly in the past to merge every development
>> of Libav into FFmpeg, so that should solve your struggle for good.
>>
>> Feel
>
> My advise would be to focus on Libav, as FFmpeg closely tracks
> "upstream", and claims to ensures API/ABI compatibility. Michael
> Niedermayer offered repeatedly in the past to merge every development
> of Libav into FFmpeg, so that should solve your struggle for good.
>
> Feel free to drop by
Dear Debian maintainers,
I'm a contributor on the GPAC multimedia project. I'm writing to you
because we spend more and more time trying to keep our project compatible
with both FFmpeg and libav. This is not sustainable.
We would need you to provide both FFmpeg and libav as separate packages in
D
