Bug#810563: bs1770gain: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9/3.0 (Werror)

2016-03-06 Thread Peter Belkner
[Andreas Cadhalpun] > Attached is a patch removing the use of -Werror, which is > a good practice for development builds, but just causes > unnecessary build failures for release builds. Andreas, could you please let us know the cause for the error? Is it the following? ffsox_source.c:157:7

Bug#797965: bs1770gain somehow "destroys" gapless playback on (at least) lame encoded MP3s

2015-12-19 Thread Peter Belkner
On 19.12.2015 23:24, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: Now I'm a bit skeptical about "LAME adding some special tags". You've used lame with '--id3v2-utf16 --add-id3v2 --id3v1-only'. What is this supposed to do? Add id3v1 tags, or id3v2 or both? AFAIK it's the so called LAME or XING header. I myself was

Bug#797965: bs1770gain somehow "destroys" gapless playback on (at least) lame encoded MP3s

2015-12-19 Thread Peter Belkner
On 19.12.2015 20:47, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, On 19.12.2015 20:40, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: As the bs1770gain developer Peter Belkner explain, this issue is really an issue in ffmpeg and not in bs1770gain. Because of this, I reassign it to ffmpeg. Can you

Bug#797965: bs1770gain somehow "destroys" gapless playback on (at least) lame encoded MP3s

2015-12-19 Thread Peter Belkner
On 19.12.2015 20:59, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: Hi Peter, On 19.12.2015 20:53, Peter Belkner wrote: On 19.12.2015 20:47, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: On 19.12.2015 20:40, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: As the bs1770gain developer Peter Belkner explain, this issue is really an issue in ffmpeg and not

Bug#797965: BS1770GAIN

2015-09-05 Thread Peter Belkner
On 04.09.2015 23:02, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: @Peter: Why exactly do you need to use ffmpeg for writing? Shouldn't it be enough to write some tags? Because bs1770gain is not supposed to have a myriad of backends to deal with. It should be just one: FFmpeg. The hope is that one day FF

Bug#790349: bs1770gain: Fail to build when clock_t is not long int

2015-06-28 Thread Peter Belkner
Many thanks. On 28.06.2015 13:23, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Based on the information available from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1083142/what-s-the-correct-way-to-use-printf-to-print-a-clock-t >, refering to http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/sys/types.h.html > where

Bug#789250: bs1770gain: Fail to build on archs with strict alignment requirements

2015-06-24 Thread Peter Belkner
Yes. These errors are not real errors. We're working on avoiding them anyway. On 24.06.2015 16:01, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 24.06.2015, 07:23 +0200 schrieb Peter Belkner: To fix the error drop "-Wcast-align" from "CFLAGS" in the respective "

Bug#789250: Generating audio with SoX

2015-06-24 Thread Peter Belkner
On 24.06.2015 12:41, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Peter Belkner] You may use SoX to generate test files. Thank you. I'll try to figure out how to use sox for this. http://notes.tomcarlson.com/sox http://montessorimuddle.org/2012/04/19/generating-and-saving-tones-wit

Bug#789250: bs1770gain: Fail to build on archs with strict alignment requirements

2015-06-24 Thread Peter Belkner
On 24.06.2015 12:41, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Peter Belkner] BS1770GAIN doesn't make any assumption on buffer alignment itself (i.e. it relies on FFmpeg), and so myself. Are there any hints that FFmpeg is broken on the systems in question? I do not know. But I am more worried

Bug#789250: bs1770gain: Fail to build on archs with strict alignment requirements

2015-06-24 Thread Peter Belkner
24.06.2015 10:42, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Peter Belkner] Any test using the transcoding feature (i.e. option "-ao") uses this code. It's needed exclusively for that purpose. The code builds the frames to be fed into the FLAC encoder. Right. So a data source with types align

Bug#789250: bs1770gain: Fail to build on archs with strict alignment requirements

2015-06-24 Thread Peter Belkner
Any test using the transcoding feature (i.e. option "-ao") uses this code. It's needed exclusively for that purpose. The code builds the frames to be fed into the FLAC encoder. On 24.06.2015 09:58, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Peter Belkner] If you have any doubts whether t

Bug#789250: bs1770gain: Fail to build on archs with strict alignment requirements

2015-06-23 Thread Peter Belkner
up to the FFmpeg API function "av_frame_get_buffer()" to set the "data" field of an "AVFrame" to the right alignment and it's not the aim of FFmpeg API client code. On 24.06.2015 07:23, Peter Belkner wrote: The first build of bs1770gain on

Bug#789250: bs1770gain: Fail to build on archs with strict alignment requirements

2015-06-23 Thread Peter Belkner
The first build of bs1770gain on the autobuilders showed an error on at least the mipsel architecture, that look like this: ffsox_frame_convert.c: In function 'convert_s16i_s8i': ffsox_frame_convert.c:143:6: error: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Werror=cast-align] rp=(R *

Bug#789254: This sample seems not to be processable by FFmpeg

2015-06-22 Thread Peter Belkner
On 22.06.2015 10:09, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: Hi! On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, Peter Belkner wrote: if (0!=*got_packet) { av_packet_rescale_ts(pkt,cc->time_base,st->time_base); + // where do the "magic" factor 0.5 come from? + pkt->dts>>=1; + pkt->pts&

Bug#789254: This sample seems not to be processable by FFmpeg

2015-06-22 Thread Peter Belkner
On 22.06.2015 09:55, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Peter Belkner] I was testing with Winamp and the FFmpeg based "in_ffsox" input plugin. It was not "stuttering" at all. I discovered "stuttering" only when testing with VLC player. Aha. Meanwhile I've le

Bug#789254: This sample seems not to be processable by FFmpeg

2015-06-22 Thread Peter Belkner
On 22.06.2015 08:14, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Peter Belkner] I've made an educated guess on how to continue: simply skip the package, and it seems to work smoothly: How did you test? I was testing with Winamp and the FFmpeg based "in_ffsox" input plugin. It was not "s

Bug#789254: This sample seems not to be processable by FFmpeg

2015-06-21 Thread Peter Belkner
t->size=0; ! return 0; } pkt->size-=size; On 21.06.2015 23:56, Peter Belkner wrote: Hi Carl Eugen, thanks for sharing. The issue under the hood is seems to be that avcodec_decode_audio4() returns with error "[mp2 @ 0x9e527c0] Header missing". How

Bug#789254: This sample seems not to be processable by FFmpeg

2015-06-21 Thread Peter Belkner
ne 2015 10:28:55 pm Peter Belkner wrote: What BS1770GAIN does is best approximated by the following FFmpeg command (copying the video stream, transcoding the audio stream into FLAC and muxing both into a MKV container): $ ffmpeg -i sample/20030213-cvs.mpeg -vcodec copy -acodec flac -y ffmpe

Bug#789254: This sample seems not to be processable by FFmpeg

2015-06-21 Thread Peter Belkner
What BS1770GAIN does is best approximated by the following FFmpeg command (copying the video stream, transcoding the audio stream into FLAC and muxing both into a MKV container): $ ffmpeg -i sample/20030213-cvs.mpeg -vcodec copy -acodec flac -y ffmpeg/20030213-cvs.mkv FFmpeg aborts with th

Bug#789254: This sample seems not to be processable by FFmpeg

2015-06-21 Thread Peter Belkner
integrated: -34.7 LUFS / 11.7 LU transcoding ... [1/1] "20030213-cvs.mkv" done. Regards, Peter Belkner ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers