* Thomas Orgis:
> Am Tue, 27 Sep 2016 10:27:04 +0100
> schrieb James Cowgill :
>
>> Does this have a CVE ID? If not it should get one.
>
> I wondered about that. At the moment I just acted on the bug report and
> pushed the fix. I have to personal experience with the CVE procedure.
> In the past,
* Ben Finney:
> As an interesting point, GPLv3 is even better for this: it has a clause
> (GPLv3 ยง7) that explicitly grants the recipient the freedom to ignore
> the offending additional restriction, and to strip that restriction from
> the terms when they redistribute the work.
It's somewhat dou
