lv2fil package should be either removed or reverted, as it is broken.
Personally I think a revert is preferable since the package has value.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Erik Ackermann wrote:
> Any progress on this? Just tried installing the package again and it is
> still the same
Any progress on this? Just tried installing the package again and it is
still the same broken version.
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jaromír Mikeš
> wrote:
> > Ok, but I would like to know opinion of Alessio as he is person with best
3 final I think this
makes a compelling experience. As it stands the package is broken and
should either be removed or reverted to the stable version, though I would
plead for the latter.
Thanks,
Erik
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2012/10/8 Erik Ackermann :
>
> &
Friendly ping. I would be happy to revert the broken package myself if I
could be given permissions and pointed to some instructions.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Erik Ackermann
wrote:
> Hi Debian Multimedia Maintainers,
>
> The lv2fil package was updated during Oneiric to a b
Hi Debian Multimedia Maintainers,
The lv2fil package was updated during Oneiric to a broken git snapshot.
According to your Packages overview, "2.0-1" is still listed as the stable
version. Can we revert the Ubuntu version to the stable version?
The project is no longer active, and 2.0-1 is the l
