Raise my hand.” |
`\ —Emo Philips |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedi
o__) _The Devil's Dictionary_, 1906 |
Ben Finney
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
ilson_ |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
k |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Ben Finney writes:
> That much was already clear. It's still not a coherent license, under
> either of those conditions, and hence grants no valid license to the
> copyright holder.
I wrote that incorrectly: it should end with “… no valid license from the
copyright holder”.
--
27;t valid for the
recipient. If *all* of the options do that, under different names, then
the recipient still has been presented no useful options.
--
\ “Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he |
`\ sticks his head out when you're coming home his face m
der the impression that i will not receive any more answer on this
> topic from their side.
Thank you very much for your efforts to date!
--
\ “Beware of and eschew pompous prolixity.” —Charles A. Beardsley |
`\
"IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)" writes:
> On 2015-09-30 02:18, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Yes, that is clearly what the GPL calls an “additional restriction”
> > on the recipient's exercise of their freedoms guaranteed by the
> > GPL.
(The wording used in GPLv2
ing the dependency.
--
\ “Come on Milhouse, there’s no such thing as a soul! It’s just |
`\ something they made up to scare kids, like the Boogie Man or |
_o__) Michael Jackson.” —Bart, _The Simpsons_ |
Ben Finney
__
