clone 686697 -1
reassign -1 python-dmedia
retitle -1 Depends on obsoleted package desktopcouch / desktopcouch-tools
severity -1 important
block 686697 by -1
tags 686697 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi David, hi dmedia maintainers!
* David Paleino [120904 22:21]:
> please remove source package "desktopcouc
Hi maintainer(s)!
Just a minor remakr: All the files in the waflib directory contain a
pointer to
http://waf.googlecode.com/git/docs/wafbook/single.html#_obtaining_the_waf_file.
However, that URL just gives a 404.
Best regards,
Alexander
___
pkg-
As requested by alessio
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Hi maintainer(s)!
Please add the license and copyright holder of libplatform/prog/option.cpp
to your debian/copyright.
Best regards,
Alexander
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://li
Hi Eugen!
Am 07.08.2011 23:25, schrieb Eugen Dedu:
> I am maintainer of ptlib/opal/ekiga packages and I have noticed that
> since recently some in-the-past non-free codecs (H264 for example) are
> now working since they are in debian main.
>
> I would like to know why libav (ffmpeg) and x264 are
Hi!
Am 19.04.2011 08:45, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>> while I *highly appreciate* your timely acceptance of the vo-aacenc
>> package (AAC is an MPEG specification after all), I still fail to see
>> why very similar packages like lame are left unattended in the NEW queue
>> for 9 months now!
Do y
Hi again!
Sorry for the second mail, but I just noticed a sourceless pdf file in your
orig tarball: blockdiagram.pdf. As I'm not entirely sure, if the pdf is
it's source (I'm note sure, but consider it possible), I would like to ask
you to clarify it with upstream, but see no reasen to reject it
Hi!
Regarding your package description... May I assume that "TetraProc converts
the A-format signals from a tetrahedral Ambisonic microphone into B-format
signals ready for recording. [..]" makes sense to those, who are familiar with
the topic? I have no idea, what it does (but am most likely als
Am 14.04.2011 01:10, schrieb Alessio Treglia:
>> (new) gwc-dbg_0.21.13~repack2-1_amd64.deb extra debug
> there is a licensing issue with this package, please drop it.
Done.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.al
As requested by maintainer
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintai
Hi maintainer(s)!
Citing your copyright:
==
Copyright: 2007-2010 Stefano D'Angelo
License: BSD
==
Looking at the files I found:
doc/html/javascript/main.js and doc/html/styles/* Licensed under the terms
of the AGPLv3, doc/html/javascript/prettify.js dual licensed AGPLv3 or
Apac
Hi maintainer(s)!
I'm going to accept your package, but our ftp-trainee found a missing
copyright holder in your copyright file. Please add him with your next
upload:
Please add Krzysztof Foltman as a copyright holder (for
"ladiconf").
Best regards,
Alexander, FTP Assistant
_
As requested by maintainer
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintain
Hi!
Am 11.11.2010 16:02, schrieb Alessio Treglia:
> I'm closing this as mixxx has been removed from Squeeze and this bug
> is no longer reproducible with mixxx >> 1.8
Then you should have added a proper version semi-header so the bts knows
which version have been affected by this bug and which h
Hi maintainer!
I'm going to accept your package, but please rewrite your package
description. The only thing I understood from it, is that it does
soemthing with music (and even that is atually more a guess).
Best regards,
Alexander
___
pkg-multi
upload.
+ * Disable user interface (Closes: #580120)
+
+ -- Alexander Reichle-Schmehl Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:52:21 +0200
+
mediatomb (0.12.0~svn2018-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Allow mediatomb to build against ffmpegthumbnailer 2.0 library.
diff -Nru mediatomb-0.12.0~svn2018/debian/config.xml.dist mediatom
tags 580120 + patch
tags 580120 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for mediatomb (versioned as 0.12.0~svn2018-6.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
___
pkg-multimedia
Am 16.07.2010 15:30, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> We'll push your NMU changes after they emerge as source package in the
> archive. Thanks for the help, and (again) sorry for wasting your time
> trying to be even more helpful.
No problem. At least I learnt a little bit about git ;)
Best regard
Hi!
Am 16.07.2010 14:41, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> You probably just need to use either -a or -u option to debcheckout.
Ah, of course, I only did an anonymous checkout.
> Easiest is probably to start over with a fresh debcheckout.
Tried that, now I get an other error:
a...@nb-xp13822:/tmp/
Hi Jonas!
Am 15.07.2010 15:34, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> On the contrary: your change is nice - please do upload without delay.
Thanks, moved it to the 0-day queue.
> You are however much encouraged to apply the change directly to our git
> (debcheckout should work) - it is maintained in col
pload.
+ * debian/patches/1004_install_correct_dir.patch: Install files into
+/usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64 (Closes: #588554)
+
+ -- Alexander Reichle-Schmehl Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:00:24 +0200
+
jamin (0.97.14~cvs~81203-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Revert to depend (not just recommend) swh-plugins.
Hi maintainer!
I'm sorry, but your debian/copyright file is incomplete.
Some undocumented examples I found:
bess.rb, Michael Scholz, 2-Clause BSD
bess1.rb, Michael Scholz, GPLv2+
dlocsig.rb, Michael Scholz, GPLv2+
dlocsig.scm, Fernando Lopez Lezcano, "as long as no fees or compensation are
char
Hi Maintainer!
I'm going to accept your package, but could you please clarify the license
of your deian/* files in a succeding upload? I guess you intended to
license is under the terms of the GPL (as you refer to the GPL at the
bottom of it).
Best regards,
Alexander
__
Hi maintainer!
librtmp/* seems to be licensed under the terms of the LGPL 2.1+. Please add
that to your copyright file.
Best regards,
Alexander
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
c
Hi maintainer!
Please try to improve your package descritpion. I have actually no idea
what this software does...
Best regards,
Alexander, ftp-assistant
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.or
25 matches
Mail list logo