smplayer 17.11.2~ds0-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the smplayer source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 17.8.0~ds0-1 Current version: 17.11.2~ds0-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

ffdiaporama is marked for autoremoval from testing

ffdiaporama 1.5-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-12-17 It is affected by these RC bugs: 873191: ffdiaporama: please switch to ffmpeg ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://l

Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license

Dear Debian Legal Team, I've CCed you for my reply to this bug, because I don't have the experience to be able to tell if Debian implicitly relicensed Audacious as GPL-3 from 2012-2016, how potentially falling out of BSD-2-clause license compliance might have affected this, and also how this shoul

Bug#883834: kmetronome: FTBFS with latest Qt5: does not find Qt5LinguistToolsConfig.cmake

Source: kmetronome Version: 1.0.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi, kmetronome/experimental recently started to FTBFS with the current Qt5 in sid/experimental: debian/rules build dh build dh_update_autotools_config dh_a

Processed: Re: Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # License change happened in 3.3 (about 5 years ago) > found 883731 3.3.1-1 Bug #883731 [audacious] audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license Marked as found in versions audacious/3.3.1-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license

Hi Nicholas, > On this topic, would you please update contrib/audacious.appdata.xml > to reflect the current Audacious license (GPL3)? It claims the > project_license is BSD-2-Clause. Sorry if my initial email was unclear. The current Audacious license *is* BSD 2-clause, with some exceptions: 1

Bug#883731: audacious: Debian packaging has incorrect license

Hi John, On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 05:08:56PM -0500, John Lindgren wrote: > > Per Debian policy 2.3: > > "Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright > information and distribution license in the file > /usr/share/doc/package/copyright > (see Copyright information for fu

Bug#883684: marked as done (fluidsynth: symbols changed on !linux architectures)

Your message dated Thu, 07 Dec 2017 15:05:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#883684: fixed in fluidsynth 1.1.8-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #883684, regarding fluidsynth: symbols changed on !linux architectures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

fluidsynth_1.1.8-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 15:12:36 +0100 Source: fluidsynth Binary: fluidsynth libfluidsynth1 libfluidsynth-dev Architecture: source Version: 1.1.8-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintaine

Processing of fluidsynth_1.1.8-2_source.changes

fluidsynth_1.1.8-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: fluidsynth_1.1.8-2.dsc fluidsynth_1.1.8-2.debian.tar.xz fluidsynth_1.1.8-2_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) _

Processed: Bug#883684 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 883684 pending Bug #883684 [src:fluidsynth] fluidsynth: symbols changed on !linux architectures Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 883684: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug