Re: sonic-pi_2.9.0~repack-1_amd64.changes is NEW

Hi. Let me start by telling you how happy and impressed I am with the handling of the NEW queue the last few months. The number of packages waiting there now is record low. It is inspiring to know that Debian have new packages published so quickly. Thank you very much! The background for my e

brp-pacu is marked for autoremoval from testing

brp-pacu 2.1.1+git20111020-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-03-13 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 811223: fftw: FTBFS: perl texi2html: Can't use 'defined(@array)' ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multi

sndobj is marked for autoremoval from testing

sndobj 2.6.6.1-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-03-13 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 811223: fftw: FTBFS: perl texi2html: Can't use 'defined(@array)' ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintai

ams is marked for autoremoval from testing

ams 2.1.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-03-13 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 811223: fftw: FTBFS: perl texi2html: Can't use 'defined(@array)' ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@

Re: Request for review & inclusion: sonic-pi (see #796550)

[Hanno Zulla] > Ok, the gbp repo is now restared and I have removed the stale unused > tags we stumbled over on IRC. Very good. > You put it on git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/sonic-pi.git and if > you're now fine with it, please upload. Thanks! I've uploaded, but it have not shown up in the N

sonic-pi_2.9.0~repack-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:sonic-pi is NEW. binary:sonic-pi-samples is NEW. binary:sonic-pi-server is NEW. binary:sonic-pi-server-doc is NEW. source:sonic-pi is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good Op

Comments regarding kodi-pvr-hdhomerun_1.0.4+git20151120-1_amd64.changes

Hi Balint, after unpacking your orig.tar.xz, the names look like: kodi-pvr-hdhomerun-1.0.4^M/src/client.h Is that extra carriage return intentional? Thorsten ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debi

Processing of sonic-pi_2.9.0~repack-1_amd64.changes

sonic-pi_2.9.0~repack-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sonic-pi_2.9.0~repack-1.dsc sonic-pi_2.9.0~repack.orig.tar.gz sonic-pi_2.9.0~repack-1.debian.tar.xz sonic-pi-dbgsym_2.9.0~repack-1_amd64.deb sonic-pi-samples_2.9.0~repack-1_all.deb sonic-pi-se

Bug#805197: marked as done (dino: FTBFS: incompatability with newer sigc++/glibmm)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:41:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#814498: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #805197, regarding dino: FTBFS: incompatability with newer sigc++/glibmm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#805658: marked as done (azr3-jack: FTBFS: error: call of overloaded ‘ref(Gtk::Fixed&)’ is ambiguous)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:42:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#814504: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #805658, regarding azr3-jack: FTBFS: error: call of overloaded ‘ref(Gtk::Fixed&)’ is ambiguous to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#814504: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: azr3-jack |1.2.3-2 | source, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips64el azr3-jack | 1.2.3-2+b2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x

Bug#814504: Removed package(s) from unstable

Version: 1.2.3-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package azr3-jack has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/814504 The

Bug#814498: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: dino |0.2.8-3 | source, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips64el dino | 0.2.8-3+b2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x dino | 0.2

Bug#814498: Removed package(s) from unstable

Version: 0.2.8-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package dino has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/814498 The vers

ffmpeg2theora 0.30-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the ffmpeg2theora source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.29.0~git+20140316-3 Current version: 0.30-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a d

nordlicht 0.4.4-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the nordlicht source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.4.4-1 Current version: 0.4.4-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will recei

Re: Request for review & inclusion: sonic-pi (see #796550)

Hi Petter, > Should I restart the gbp repo, now that it's using the > watch/uscan/repack solution instead of debian/rules get-orig-source? > > Also, is it now time to move the repo from github to > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/ ? Ok, the gbp repo is now restared and I have remov

Re: Request for review & inclusion: sonic-pi (see #796550)

Hi, Am 11.02.2016 um 19:51 schrieb IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU): > then please add a lintian-override documenting the reason. Done, thanks for pointing that out. Am 11.02.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > nocheck[1] is not honored. You'll need something like the following: Thanks

Bug#814504: RM: azr3-jack -- ROM; RC buggy; unmaintained upstream

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, Please remove azr3-jack. Regards. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A _

Bug#805681: marked as done (seq24: FTBFS: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:55:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#805681: fixed in seq24 0.9.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #805681, regarding seq24: FTBFS: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

seq24_0.9.3-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:16:45 + Source: seq24 Binary: seq24 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.9.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Changed-By: Alessio Treglia Des

Processing of seq24_0.9.3-1_amd64.changes

seq24_0.9.3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: seq24_0.9.3-1.dsc seq24_0.9.3.orig.tar.gz seq24_0.9.3-1.debian.tar.xz seq24-dbgsym_0.9.3-1_amd64.deb seq24_0.9.3-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.or

Processed: Bug#805681 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 805681 pending Bug #805681 [src:seq24] seq24: FTBFS: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 805681: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi

Bug#814496: liblrdf: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'distclean'.

Source: liblrdf Version: 0.4.0-5 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, liblrdf fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]