supercollider is marked for autoremoval from testing

2015-08-25 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
supercollider 1:3.6.6~repack-2-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-09-16 It is affected by these RC bugs: 795968: supercollider: FTBFS: undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free' ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multime

Bug#793961: Update on TimGM6mb bug?

2015-08-25 Thread Jack Underwood
Any news on this bug? It looks like quite a simple fix, I would do it myself but I don't know how to use the debian git system (I have only ever used github before). Best, Jack ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@l

Processed: fixed in ubuntu

2015-08-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #788033 [src:laditools] laditools: Uses obsolete vte3 which is going away Added tag(s) patch. -- 788033: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788033 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#788033: fixed in ubuntu

2015-08-25 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Control: tags -1 + patch As already mentioned in bug#770076 this has already been fixed in the ubuntu package. Tagging patch. See http://packages.qa.debian.org/laditools for the url to the ubuntu patch. Syncing the ubuntu changes would be nice to solve both of these bug reports. Regards, Andreas

Bug#796532: kodi: FTBFS on arm64

2015-08-25 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Edmund, Could you please confirm that the built Kodi works fine? I would like to forward the patch to upstream and they tend to ask about testing.;-) Cheers, Balint 2015-08-22 14:11 GMT+02:00 Edmund Grimley Evans : > Source: kodi > Version: 15.1+dfsg1-2 > Tags: patch > > Thanks for sorting ou

lives: Depending on plugins? Suggesting with archs?

2015-08-25 Thread Debian/GNU
hi, i wonder why lives has a *hard* dependency on frei0r-plugins. will it refuse work if that set of plugins (that are dlopen()ed) are not present on the system? i would like to move it to 'Recommends', to allow for more flexibility for installations. i also wonder why there is an arch-specifica

Bug#766993: jackd2: FTBFS with DEB_BUILD_PARALLEL=1 DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="parallel=4"

2015-08-25 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Adrian Knoth (2015-08-25 17:42:28) > On 10/27/14 16:24, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Quoting YunQiang Su (2014-10-27 15:16:44) > >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >>> If I understand your patch correctly (have only read it briefly) the > >>> first lines are be

Bug#796807: marked as done (jackd2: please make the build reproducible)

2015-08-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Aug 2015 16:20:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#796807: fixed in jackd2 1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #796807, regarding jackd2: please make the build reproducible to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

jackd2_1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2015-08-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:13:51 +0200 Source: jackd2 Binary: jackd2 libjack-jackd2-0 jackd2-firewire libjack-jackd2-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low

Bug#766993: jackd2: FTBFS with DEB_BUILD_PARALLEL=1 DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="parallel=4"

2015-08-25 Thread Adrian Knoth
On 10/27/14 16:24, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting YunQiang Su (2014-10-27 15:16:44) On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: If I understand your patch correctly (have only read it briefly) the first lines are better written without making shell calls, like this: WAF_EXTRA_A

Bug#786737: jackd1: crashes with -n option specified

2015-08-25 Thread Adrian Knoth
On 05/25/15 04:53, Frank Heckenbach wrote: Package: jackd1 Version: 1:0.124.1+20140122git5013bed0-3 Severity: normal Tags: upstream patch When the "-n" option is given, jackd crashes when accessing properties (which it seems to do implicitly for any client, e.g. jack_lsp). Forwarded to jack-d

Processing of jackd2_1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-1_amd64.changes

2015-08-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
jackd2_1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: jackd2_1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-1.dsc jackd2_1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg.orig.tar.gz jackd2_1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz jackd2-firewire_1.9.10+2015

Processing of jackd2_1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-1_amd64.changes

2015-08-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
jackd2_1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: jackd2_1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-1.dsc jackd2_1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg.orig.tar.gz jackd2_1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz jackd2-firewire

Bug#728710: jackd2: Bus error w/ POST_PACKED_STRUCTURE on powerpc G4 32bit

2015-08-25 Thread Adrian Knoth
On 05/15/15 01:27, Martin Langer wrote: Hi, Hi! I run into the same bus error with a freshly installed jessie on my powerpc (1GHz Powerbook, G4). Nevertheless this small patch fixes the bus error and jack is running fine now with jessie. Thanks for reporting back. I've applied the patch to

Processed: tagging 728710

2015-08-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 728710 + fixed-upstream Bug #728710 [jackd2] jackd2: Bus error w/ POST_PACKED_STRUCTURE on powerpc G4 32bit Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 728710: http://bugs.de

ardour3_4.2~dfsg-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2015-08-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 22:00:18 +0200 Source: ardour3 Binary: ardour3 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 4.2~dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Changed-By: Adrian Knoth De

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

2015-08-25 Thread forum : : für : : umläute
On 2015-08-25 15:29, Adrian Knoth wrote: > > This still stands, I just uploaded 4.2 under the old name "ardour3" due > to lack of time. > > Just mentioning. Whoever has spare cycles, feel free to go ahead. > so what would the transition look like? "ardour3" package: - switch back to "master" b

Bug#796807: jackd2: please make the build reproducible

2015-08-25 Thread Adrian Knoth
On 08/24/15 18:46, Chris Lamb wrote: Source: jackd2 Version: 1.9.10+20140719git3eb0ae6a~dfsg-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org The attached patch removes locale and ti

Processing of ardour3_4.2~dfsg-1_amd64.changes

2015-08-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ardour3_4.2~dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ardour3_4.2~dfsg-1.dsc ardour3_4.2~dfsg.orig.tar.gz ardour3_4.2~dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz ardour3_4.2~dfsg-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

Processing of ardour3_4.2~dfsg-1_amd64.changes

2015-08-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ardour3_4.2~dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: ardour3_4.2~dfsg-1.dsc ardour3_4.2~dfsg.orig.tar.gz ardour3_4.2~dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz ardour3_4.2~dfsg-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debia

Re: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

2015-08-25 Thread Adrian Knoth
On 07/20/15 16:28, Adrian Knoth wrote: Ardour3 version 4.1 Seriously? http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2015-April/043650.html This exactly. It may not be a big deal (new versions of ardour an load old sessions), but for a bit-exact re-export of older ses

Fonfon.cn: Buy and Sell Quality Pre-Owned Merchandise - BMW X6, Hanmac Phone, iPhone 6, Callaway Golf Club Sets ...

2015-08-25 Thread 方方 fonfon . cn
Click here for the web version of this message

Re: Bug#791290: sndobj: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-25 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 at 13:22:49 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Sndobj requires a transition. Renamed package has been uploaded to > experimental and is in NEW. Since sndobj does not appear to build-depend on any libraries that need a transition, I believe it can be uploaded to unstable any time.