Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
On 17.07.2015 00:29, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:08:10PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team decided to switch from Libav
>> to FFmpeg [1]. Thus please remove the testing migration block of ffmpeg.
>
Package: vlc
Version: 2.2.0~rc2-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
VLC plays most media streams very reliably but streams like the following
invariably break
up and repeat bits, quckly falling way behind:
- http://www.abc.net.au/res/streaming/audio/hls/local_perth.m3u8
- http://www.abc.net.au/
guayadeque 0.3.7~ds0-2.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-08-05
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
778175: wxsqlite3: ftbfs with GCC-5
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.deb
> debian/copyright misses a few files:
> Files: vidix/sysdep/pci_sco.c
> vidix/sysdep/pci_os2.c
> vidix/sysdep/pci_mach386.c
> vidix/sysdep/pci_netbsd.c
> vidix/sysdep/pci_386bsd.c
> vidix/cyberblade_regs.h
> vidix/sysdep/pci_lynx.c
> vidix/sysdep/pci_isc.c
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ffmpeg-libav.html
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:08:10PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team decided to switch from Libav
> to FFmpeg [1]. Thus please remove the testing mig
Hi,
On 16.07.2015 14:12, Miguel A. Colón Vélez wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>> has anyone seen this yet?
>>
>> https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/mplayer_2:1.1.1+r37401-1.html
>>
>> Does anyone know what is going on, has anyone been informed, has anyone
>> been
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
Dear Release Team,
the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team decided to switch from Libav
to FFmpeg [1]. Thus please remove the testing migrati
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:07:46 +0200
Source: libde265
Binary: libde265-0 libde265-dev libde265-dbg libde265-examples
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimed
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 20:46:14 +0200
Source: libcoverart
Binary: libcoverart-dev libcoverart1 libcoverartcc1v5 libcoverart-dbg
libcoverart-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.0+git20150706-4
Distribution: experimental
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 20:40:13 +0200
Source: libmusicbrainz5
Binary: libmusicbrainz5-dev libmusicbrainz5-doc libmusicbrainz5-2
libmusicbrainz5cc2v5
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.1.0+git20150707-4
Distribution: experim
libmusicbrainz5_5.1.0+git20150707-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
libmusicbrainz5_5.1.0+git20150707-4.dsc
libmusicbrainz5_5.1.0+git20150707-4.debian.tar.xz
libmusicbrainz5-doc_5.1.0+git20150707-4_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (
Am Donnerstag, den 16.07.2015, 15:46 +0200 schrieb Jack Underwood:
> Yes, I know that, I meant we have A suggests B; and A suggests C
> which
> depends on B, with A as musescore2, B as timgm6mb-soundfont and C as
> musescore-soundfont-gm. I wanted to make the point that one of those
> suggests
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 792593 upstream
Bug #792593 [src:lives] lives: please make the build reproducible
Added tag(s) upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
792593: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Your message dated Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:01:57 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Unreproducible
has caused the Debian Bug report #792595,
regarding mediatomb-common: Licence clash with libmp4v2 (MPL) and mediatomb
GPL-+2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:29:58 +0100
with message-id
has caused the report #792593,
regarding lives: please make the build reproducible
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Gabriel Finch
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea
Hi Gabriel,
How are you doing? Hope it's all good.
I received this email from the Debian Reproducible builds team which
brought a patch up to my attention to make the build of lives
reproducible from sources.
Please see the following message:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Dhole wrote:
> While
Package: mediatomb-common
Version: 0.12.1-47-g7ab7616-1
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
In mediatomb 0.12.1-7 libmp4v2 support has been disabled due to licence
problem and now libmp4v2 support has been enabled again...
Could you explain ?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
Source: lives
Version: 2.4.0~ds0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that lives could not be built reproducibly. During the building of the
plugins from s
Am Donnerstag, den 16.07.2015, 15:46 +0200 schrieb Jack Underwood:
> Perhaps this comes as a mixup between 1.x and 2.0, but it seemed like
> Tiago said we had to wait for timgm6mb-soundfont to get approved before
> musescore-2.x could go into testing. I meant in my comment above that
> as muses
On 16/07/15 09:28, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Why do we have to wait for ftp-master approval of timgm6mb-soundfont?
Because musescore-soundfont-gm has been turned into a dummy package
that has "Depends: timgm6mb-soundfont" -- rightly so. But, if the
latter package is not in the archive, this depen
Hi Joachim
On 2015-07-16 11:11:32, Joachim Bauch wrote:
> there is a new upstream release of libde265 for which I just updated
> the packaging on Alioth:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/libde265.git/
>
> Could somebody please review my changes and upload the new package if
> all i
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> has anyone seen this yet?
>
> https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/mplayer_2:1.1.1+r37401-1.html
>
> Does anyone know what is going on, has anyone been informed, has anyone
> been contacted by the package maintainer or sponsor (
On 16.07.2015 12:34, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Hi all,
has anyone seen this yet?
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/mplayer_2:1.1.1+r37401-1.html
Does anyone know what is going on, has anyone been informed, has anyone
been contacted by the package maintainer or sponsor (CC:ed)?
I mean, even if t
Hi all,
has anyone seen this yet?
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/mplayer_2:1.1.1+r37401-1.html
Does anyone know what is going on, has anyone been informed, has anyone
been contacted by the package maintainer or sponsor (CC:ed)?
I mean, even if this package was removed from unstable and was n
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 23:42:42 +0200
Source: ffmpeg
Binary: ffmpeg qt-faststart ffmpeg-dbg ffmpeg-doc libavcodec-ffmpeg56
libavcodec-ffmpeg-extra56 libavcodec-extra libavcodec-dev libavdevice-ffmpeg56
libavdevice-dev libavfi
Am Mittwoch, den 15.07.2015, 03:15 +0200 schrieb Jack Underwood:
> I find that thread a bit difficult to follow, did you mean that
I admit it is, because both you and I have mixed up the musescore-1.x
and musescore-2.0 packages in the course of our discussion.
> musescore-2.0 should depend
> on
26 matches
Mail list logo
