Thanks for taking care of this so promptly!
Reinhard
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:08 PM, wrote:
> The annotated tag, debian/4.2.1-3 has been created
> at e7e1751eab366d8cf62509117186db5a24cf8140 (tag)
>tagging 720ece48c3942b4304812b900ed58f6ad9865a1e (commit)
> replaces debian/4.2
Your message dated Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:48:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#735760: fixed in libdvdnav 4.2.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #735760,
regarding handbrake: FTBFS: dvdnav.c:1230: undefined reference to 'dvdnav_dup'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:48:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#735760: fixed in libdvdnav 4.2.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #735760,
regarding libdvdnav: removed dvdnav_dup{,_free} API
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:26:10 +0100
Source: libdvdnav
Binary: libdvdnav4 libdvdnav-dbg libdvdnav-dev libdvdnav-doc
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 4.2.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multi
libdvdnav_4.2.1-3.dsc: Invalid size hash for libdvdnav_4.2.1.orig.tar.xz:
According to the control file the size hash should be 109412,
but libdvdnav_4.2.1.orig.tar.xz has 109856.
If you did not include libdvdnav_4.2.1.orig.tar.xz in you upload, a different
version
might already be known to the
libdvdnav_4.2.1-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdvdnav_4.2.1-3.dsc
libdvdnav_4.2.1-3.debian.tar.xz
libdvdnav4_4.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libdvdnav-dbg_4.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libdvdnav-dev_4.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libdvdnav-doc_4.2.1-3_all.deb
Greetings,
libdvdnav_4.2.1-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdvdnav_4.2.1-3.dsc
libdvdnav_4.2.1-3.debian.tar.xz
libdvdnav4_4.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libdvdnav-dbg_4.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libdvdnav-dev_4.2.1-3_amd64.deb
libdvdnav-doc_4.2.1-3_all.deb
Greetings,
Oh, now I see what you are saying, yes, I personally don't mind much either way.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 2014-02-13 19:28 GMT+01:00 Reinhard Tartler :
>> Maybe something like this works for you?
>>
>> $ git reset --hard debian/4.2.1-2"
>> $ git reset --soft origi
2014-02-13 19:28 GMT+01:00 Reinhard Tartler :
> Maybe something like this works for you?
>
> $ git reset --hard debian/4.2.1-2"
> $ git reset --soft origin/master
> $ git commit -m" Revert everything to debian/4.2.1-2"
Yes, this would be the new commits way. :-)
>
> Reinhard
>
> On Thu, Feb 13,
Maybe something like this works for you?
$ git reset --hard debian/4.2.1-2"
$ git reset --soft origin/master
$ git commit -m" Revert everything to debian/4.2.1-2"
Reinhard
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Sorry, the reverts were not complete thus the curren
Hi All,
Sorry, the reverts were not complete thus the current state does not work.
I would like to reset master to debian/4.2.1-2 and add the dvdnav_dup patches
cleaning the history.
I know rolling back git branches is not nice, but it would result a
much nicer history.
Can I go ahead or I should
2014-02-13 17:24 GMT+01:00 Reinhard Tartler :
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Fabian Greffrath
> wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, den 12.02.2014, 08:47 -0500 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>>> Please tell me if you have concerns, but I think this is the right
>>> thing to do for Debian. FWIW, I believe that
Dear Bálint,
The new repository is a fork, and while I invited all the original
developers to use a proper versionning system and join me, none of them
seemed interested in that part. Adding developer keys to this repository
is quite simple, and we do that all the time.
The time taken to mov
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 12.02.2014, 08:47 -0500 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>> Please tell me if you have concerns, but I think this is the right
>> thing to do for Debian. FWIW, I believe that what we currently have in
>> git/master is good enough
Dear Jean-Baptiste and DVDnav developers,
We applaud your efforts in contributing to libdvdnav. Having
libdvdnav's code in git
and having a new very active developer is a big help to the project.
We at Debian would happily use the libdvdnav code from git as the base of our
packages, but from the
On 2014-02-12 22:10:36, Andrew Kelley wrote:
> * I have libebur128 packaged up and ready to go into unstable over
> here: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libgroove
> The packaging repository is currently
> https://github.com/andrewrk/libebur128 with the debian/* files in the
> debian branch. I a
Hi Andrew
On 2014-02-12 22:10:36, Andrew Kelley wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Sebastian Ramacher
> wrote:
> > If you intend to maintain libebur128 in the Multimedia Team, I'm happy
> > to help you get it uploaded.
>
> Some of the wiki information seems to be outdated. In particular,
Am Donnerstag, den 13.02.2014, 08:37 +0100 schrieb Jan Korous:
> I have tried 2 different DVDs which I was able to play at the same machine
> without a glitch.
Could you please try again with the libdvdcss2 package installed?
- Fabian
___
pkg-multimed
18 matches
Mail list logo
