Your message dated Mon, 4 Nov 2013 23:15:56 -0500
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#721375: Dies with SIGSEGV
has caused the Debian Bug report #721375,
regarding Dies with SIGSEGV
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On 11/04/2013 02:32 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> * Hans-Christoph Steiner [2013-11-04 14:20]:
>> Looks good. Next step is tagging a release there, so there is an upstream
>> tarball to build the package from.
> I've just pushed Stable-5.1.0.41-pointclouds-1, can you import it?
> Otherwise I ca
* Hans-Christoph Steiner [2013-11-04 14:20]:
> Looks good. Next step is tagging a release there, so there is an upstream
> tarball to build the package from.
I've just pushed Stable-5.1.0.41-pointclouds-1, can you import it?
Otherwise I can do it tomorrow.
> Here's your git repo:
>
> http://an
On 11/03/2013 01:28 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> * Hans-Christoph Steiner [2013-10-31 14:06]:
>> So how about you make a repo that has all of the general patches in it, then
>> we package that as 'openni-sensor-YOURNAMEHERE'. Then the Debian-specific
>> patches, like for building against the s
Package: cmus
Version: 2.5.0-4
Followup-For: Bug #728202
Hi!
I did yesterday a 'aptitude safe-upgrade'.
That included cmus. It was updated from 2.5.0-2 to 2.5.0-4
and since then I have the same problem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # bts housekeeping - correcting found/fixed versions to enable automatic bug
> archival
> # having the same version for found and fixed in a closed bug will be treated
> as a not-fixed-bug (no archival)
> # having no fixed versions in a closed b
Package: jackd2
Version: 1.9.9.5+20130622git7de15e7a-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch upstream
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Delcour
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: jackd2: Bus error w/ POST_PACKED_STRUCTURE o
Dear team,
Am Sonntag, den 16.06.2013, 13:04 +0200 schrieb Daniel Phillips:
> I can confirm that 0.9.9 does not have the problem (not yet packaged
> for Debian in official repositories)
what's the status of handbrake 0.9.9 in handbrake. I haven't had a look
at it for quite some time. Did someone
Dear Reinhard,
Le 03/11/2013 02:11, Reinhard Tartler a écrit :
> Hi Thibaut,
>
> can you perhaps also provide a backtrace? It seems that there are no
> public s390x porter machines where I could get that myself.
>
Unfortunately, I can't: gdb seems to be broken on s390x. Reporting bug
as we spea
