Package: smplayer
Version: 0.8.0
Hi,
I would like to report a "not really a bug" about smplayer.
Version: 0.8.0
The playback was very jerky (under updated Wheezy, Samsung NF210
netbook,), so I modified the "Local cache" setting 0 to 2000 and It
became very smooth. The default value is: 0, why?
On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:27:44 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Francesco Poli (2013-01-09 22:07:30)
[...]
> > Moreover, the comment states that Apache-2.0 is incompatible with
> > LGPL: I think this is incorrect and misleading.
>
> Ah, yes - I agree there is a typo in the comment: s/LGPL/
Quoting Francesco Poli (2013-01-09 22:07:30)
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:10:06 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Francesco Poli (2013-01-09 19:18:02)
> > > At the beginning of the new debian/copyright file, I read the following
> > > comment:
> > >
> > > | Comment:
> > > | Because the libavc
On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 22:53:48 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
[...]
> Maybe that is what you _now_ ask or what you _intended_ to ask earlier
> on, but what you have inside quotation marks here right above is not
> what you quote yourself as having said slightly further up.
Yeah, I should have been
Your message dated Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:40:42 +0400
with message-id <1357764042.673510...@f248.mail.ru>
and subject line Re: bug #670488: audacious: New upstream version available
has caused the Debian Bug report #670488,
regarding audacious: New upstream version available
to be marked as done.
Thi
Quoting Francesco Poli (2013-01-09 22:08:58)
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:11:38 +0100 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Francesco Poli
> [...]
> > > Which license is the libavcodec-extra-* package released under?
> > > LGPL-2.1+ or GPL-2+ ?
> >
> > GPL-3+
>
> GPL-3+ is the
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 22:07:30 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> The comment does clarifies this subtlety.
[...]
Obviously, this should have been
"The comment does not clarify this subtlety."
Sorry about this brain/keyboard mismatch...
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-201
On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:10:06 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi Francesco,
Hi, thanks a lot for your very fast reply!
>
> Quoting Francesco Poli (2013-01-09 19:18:02)
> > On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:51:10 + Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > >[ Jonas Smedegaard ]
> > >*
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:11:38 +0100 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Francesco Poli
[...]
> > Which license is the libavcodec-extra-* package released under?
> > LGPL-2.1+ or GPL-2+ ?
>
> GPL-3+
GPL-3+ is the effective license of the binary package.
My question was "which
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Francesco Poli
wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:51:10 + Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> [...]
>>[ Jonas Smedegaard ]
>>* Rewrite copyright file using copyright format 1.0.
>> Closes: bug#694657. Thanks to Francesco Poli.
>
> You're welcome, Jon
Hi Francesco,
Quoting Francesco Poli (2013-01-09 19:18:02)
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:51:10 + Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> [...]
> >[ Jonas Smedegaard ]
> >* Rewrite copyright file using copyright format 1.0.
> > Closes: bug#694657. Thanks to Francesco Poli.
>
> You're we
On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:51:10 + Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
[...]
>[ Jonas Smedegaard ]
>* Rewrite copyright file using copyright format 1.0.
> Closes: bug#694657. Thanks to Francesco Poli.
You're welcome, Jonas!
Thanks to you, indeed.
I have a question, though.
At the beg
Your message dated Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:00:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#662774: fixed in liblivemedia 2013.01.05-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #662774,
regarding liblivemedia-dev: Why no shared lib?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 11:57:46 +0100
Source: liblivemedia
Binary: libbasicusageenvironment0 libgroupsock0 liblivemedia1
libusageenvironment0 liblivemedia-dev livemedia-utils
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2013.01.05-1
Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2013, 17:03 + schrieb Ansgar Burchardt:
> Hi,
>
> please consider moving the source code example from the shared library package
> to the -dev package:
>
> ./usr/share/doc/libbasicusageenvironment0/examples/
Having the example code in the libbasicusageenvironment0 pa
Hi,
please consider moving the source code example from the shared library package
to the -dev package:
./usr/share/doc/libbasicusageenvironment0/examples/
Ansgar
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.
Hello
I can help on this, as I am the author/maintainer of the bindings. I do
not have much time ATM to lead the effort, but I can help.
I guess one of the first thing I would need to do on my side is to
define a proper release/versioning scheme for the bindings, which does
not exist yet, apart f
> I guess one of the first thing I would need to do on my side is to
> define a proper release/versioning scheme for the bindings, which does
> not exist yet, apart from a build_date indication.
I think the best would to integrate the building of the binding in the
vlc build system.
Alex
___
Package: libvlc5
Version: 2.0.5-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Upstream provides python bindings for liblvc. It would be nice to have
them provided with the library.
http://wiki.videolan.org/Python_bindings
Not sur in which binary package though.
Feel free to reassign or provide guidelines of what's
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Reinhard Tartler writes:
>> thanks for running PET for pkg-multimedia. We are wondering how to get
>> packages removed from pet.
>
> There is a cronjob running once a day that should make them disappear
> automatically (there are no hooks
Hi Marc,
unfortunately, it seems that the dvdauthor git repository in the
pkg-multimedia's team git currently breaks our PET instance, see the
mail quoted below. I've moved the repository out of the way in order
to fix PET. Moreover, it seems that your git layout does not conform
to how the rest o
Reinhard Tartler writes:
> thanks for running PET for pkg-multimedia. We are wondering how to get
> packages removed from pet.
There is a cronjob running once a day that should make them disappear
automatically (there are no hooks that are run after removal), but it
looks like dvdauthor.git confu
22 matches
Mail list logo
