Processed: tagging 687657

2012-09-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 687657 - patch Bug #687657 [vlc] vlc: copyright file missing after squeeze->wheezy upgrade Removed tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 687657: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor

Bug#687657: vlc: copyright file missing after squeeze->wheezy upgrade

2012-09-26 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2012-09-27 00:09, David Prévot wrote: > Please find attach a patch that should address the issue. I didn't > pushed it to DELAYED/2 because I haven't yet been able to reproduce this > specific issue. you should be able to test with debsums, currently this reports after an upgrade squeeze > whee

Bug#687657: vlc: copyright file missing after squeeze->wheezy upgrade

2012-09-26 Thread David Prévot
Control: tags -1 - pending Control: tags -1 patch On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:09:29PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: vlc > Version: 2.0.3-2 > during a test with piuparts I noticed that the copyright file of your > package is missing after an upgrade from squeeze to wheezy. Please find

Processed: Re: Bug#687657: vlc: copyright file missing after squeeze->wheezy upgrade

2012-09-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 - pending Bug #687657 [vlc] vlc: copyright file missing after squeeze->wheezy upgrade Removed tag(s) pending. > tags -1 patch Bug #687657 [vlc] vlc: copyright file missing after squeeze->wheezy upgrade Added tag(s) patch. -- 687657: http://bugs.debian.org/c

Processed: limit source to vlc, tagging 687657

2012-09-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #vlc (2.0.3-2.1) unstable; urgency=low > # > # * debian/vlc.postinst: Fix directory to symlink upgrade in postinst. > #(Closes: #687657) > # > limit source vlc Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'vlc' Limit curren

Processed: Re: Bug#688821: libglyr-dev: arch-dependent files in "Multi-Arch: same" package

2012-09-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 688821 -1 Bug #688821 [libglyr-dev] libglyr-dev: arch-dependent files in "Multi-Arch: same" package Bug 688821 cloned as bug 688899 > retitle -1 Code samples are missing in documentation on mips Bug #688899 [libglyr-dev] libglyr-dev: arch-d

Bug#688821: libglyr-dev: arch-dependent files in "Multi-Arch: same" package

2012-09-26 Thread Etienne Millon
clone 688821 -1 retitle -1 Code samples are missing in documentation on mips severity -1 normal thanks There are two unrelated problems here : - gtk-doc-tools uses a nondeterministic id generator. See for example the diff between amd64 and i386 : - + - on mips, code samp

Processed: downgrading

2012-09-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 688841 important Bug #688841 [src:glyr] glyr: FTBFS on armel Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 688841: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi

Bug#688841: downgrading

2012-09-26 Thread Etienne Millon
severity 688841 important thanks Downgrading as there was no previous armel package built. -- Etienne Millon ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/

Dorance C. Nadege's Page

2012-09-26 Thread Dorance C. Nadege
TFollower.com: Free Twitter Followers | Twitter Followers Exchange DEAR ONE: AM MADAM CYNTHIA, I WILL LIKE TO RELATE A PROJECT OF GOD THAT WILL BE OF GOOD BENEFIT TO BOTH OF US, REPLY WITH MY PRIVATE EMAIL FOR DETAILS; nadege_cynth...@yahoo.co.uk WAITS YOUR REPLY. Profile l

Bug#688800: mplayer2: can not seek wvc1 videos

2012-09-26 Thread Uoti Urpala
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 07:21 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > wvc1 videos are unseekable in mplayer2. For example if I try to seek 10 > > seconds > > forward using right key, then the video freezes. A sample video is here: > > > > http://ftyps.com/unrelated/vc1_in_wmv.wmv > > I can reproduce the

Processed: tagging 688847, tagging 688849

2012-09-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 688847 + security Bug #688847 [src:libav] libav: multiple CVEs in ffmpeg/libav Added tag(s) security. > tags 688849 + security Bug #688849 [src:ffmpeg] libav: multiple CVEs in ffmpeg/libav Added tag(s) security. > thanks Stopping processing h

Processed: reassign 688849 to src:ffmpeg

2012-09-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #brown paper bag... > reassign 688849 src:ffmpeg Bug #688849 [src:libav] libav: multiple CVEs in ffmpeg/libav Bug reassigned from package 'src:libav' to 'src:ffmpeg'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #688849 to the same values prev

Processed: cloning 688847, reassign -1 to src:libav

2012-09-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 688847 -1 Bug #688847 [src:libav] libav: multiple CVEs in ffmpeg/libav Bug 688847 cloned as bug 688849 > reassign -1 src:libav Bug #688849 [src:libav] libav: multiple CVEs in ffmpeg/libav Ignoring request to reassign bug #688849 to the same

Bug#688847: libav: multiple CVEs in ffmpeg/libav

2012-09-26 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
Source: libav Severity: grave Justification: user security hole Hi, it seems that a huge pile of CVE were allocated for ffmpeg/libav and are supposed to be fixed in 0.11: CVE-2012-2772 CVE-2012-2774 CVE-2012-2775 CVE-2012-2776 CVE-2012-2777 CVE-2012-2779 CVE-2012-2782 CVE-2012-2783 CVE-2012-2

Bug#688821: libglyr-dev: arch-dependent files in "Multi-Arch: same" package

2012-09-26 Thread Etienne Millon
* Jakub Wilk [120926 07:14]: > libglyr-dev is marked as "Multi-Arch: same", but the following files > are architecture-dependent: > > [...] > > An example diff between i386 and mips is attached. Hum, I am a bit puzzled. i386 and mips used the same version of gtk-doc-tools. The toolchain is diffe