The patch tag was added but the patch only exists in git, so I'm
attaching the raw patch to make it easier for others to debug the
segmentation fault which occurs after this patch is applied.
This patch is not sufficient to fix the bug itself.
Also, note that prior to the segmentation fault, the
Package: libav-tools
Version: 6:0.8.3-4
Severity: normal
libav-tools lists in its long description the tools it provides. Good!
...But one of the provided tools is missing: qt-faststart.
Please mention in long description all tools provided, to ease searching
for them - or at least mention qt-f
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:22:45 +0200
with message-id <20120713102245.ga1...@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
and subject line Re: Security upgrade of libavutil49 removes lot of packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #641229,
regarding Security upgrade of libavutil49 removes lot of pa
Am 07.07.2012 12:01, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I guess this is the right solution, just scratch libav-extra-dbg and
package both regular and -extra- package flavors into the same
libav-dbg.
Andres, since you have implemented libav-extra-dbg, can you have a look at this?
Any progress?
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:42:19 +0200
with message-id <4fffdf6b.1000...@greffrath.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#681136: Should libavcodec-extra-53 Provides:
libavcodec53? [Was: Re: Bug#681136: libavcodec-extra-53: Cannot install
libavcodec-extra-53 without losing kde]
has caused the
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Rushi Desai wrote:
> Will this get ported to squeeze-backports?
yes, the package in squeeze-backports needs to be updated. I'll work
on that when I find time and nobody else gets to that faster than me.
--
regards,
Reinhard
__
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 12.07.2012 11:15, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>
>> That would make 'libavcodec53' a "virtual" package, which AFAIUI would
>> break versioned dependencies as dpkg does not support "versioned
>> provides".
>
>
> This doesn't sound like a pr
Am 12.07.2012 11:15, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
That would make 'libavcodec53' a "virtual" package, which AFAIUI would
break versioned dependencies as dpkg does not support "versioned
provides".
This doesn't sound like a problem as long as both binary packages are
built from the same sources, e