Bug#672030: Attaching the patch so far

2012-07-13 Thread Neil Williams
The patch tag was added but the patch only exists in git, so I'm attaching the raw patch to make it easier for others to debug the segmentation fault which occurs after this patch is applied. This patch is not sufficient to fix the bug itself. Also, note that prior to the segmentation fault, the

Bug#681491: libav-tools: long description should mention qt-faststart

2012-07-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: libav-tools Version: 6:0.8.3-4 Severity: normal libav-tools lists in its long description the tools it provides. Good! ...But one of the provided tools is missing: qt-faststart. Please mention in long description all tools provided, to ease searching for them - or at least mention qt-f

Bug#641229: marked as done (Security upgrade of libavutil49 removes lot of packages)

2012-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:22:45 +0200 with message-id <20120713102245.ga1...@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de> and subject line Re: Security upgrade of libavutil49 removes lot of packages has caused the Debian Bug report #641229, regarding Security upgrade of libavutil49 removes lot of pa

Bug#680602: libav-dbg: bogusly Depends: libavcodec53 (= ${binary:Version})

2012-07-13 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 07.07.2012 12:01, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: I guess this is the right solution, just scratch libav-extra-dbg and package both regular and -extra- package flavors into the same libav-dbg. Andres, since you have implemented libav-extra-dbg, can you have a look at this? Any progress?

Bug#681136: marked as done (libavcodec-extra-53: Cannot install libavcodec-extra-53 without losing kde)

2012-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:42:19 +0200 with message-id <4fffdf6b.1000...@greffrath.com> and subject line Re: Bug#681136: Should libavcodec-extra-53 Provides: libavcodec53? [Was: Re: Bug#681136: libavcodec-extra-53: Cannot install libavcodec-extra-53 without losing kde] has caused the

Bug#657885: squeeze-backports

2012-07-13 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Rushi Desai wrote: > Will this get ported to squeeze-backports? yes, the package in squeeze-backports needs to be updated. I'll work on that when I find time and nobody else gets to that faster than me. -- regards, Reinhard __

Bug#681136: Should libavcodec-extra-53 Provides: libavcodec53? [Was: Re: Bug#681136: libavcodec-extra-53: Cannot install libavcodec-extra-53 without losing kde]

2012-07-13 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 12.07.2012 11:15, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: > >> That would make 'libavcodec53' a "virtual" package, which AFAIUI would >> break versioned dependencies as dpkg does not support "versioned >> provides". > > > This doesn't sound like a pr

Bug#681136: Should libavcodec-extra-53 Provides: libavcodec53? [Was: Re: Bug#681136: libavcodec-extra-53: Cannot install libavcodec-extra-53 without losing kde]

2012-07-13 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 12.07.2012 11:15, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: That would make 'libavcodec53' a "virtual" package, which AFAIUI would break versioned dependencies as dpkg does not support "versioned provides". This doesn't sound like a problem as long as both binary packages are built from the same sources, e