invada-studio-plugins-lv2_1.2.0+repack0-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: invada-studio-plugins-lv2_1.2.0+repack0-2.debian.tar.gz to main/i/invada-studio-plugins-lv2/invada-studio-plugins-lv2_1.2.0+repack0-2.debian.tar.gz invada-studio-plugins-lv2_1.2.0+repack0-2.dsc to main/i/invada-studio-plugins-lv2/invada-studio-plugins-lv2_1.2.0+repack0-2.dsc inva

Processing of invada-studio-plugins-lv2_1.2.0+repack0-2_amd64.changes

invada-studio-plugins-lv2_1.2.0+repack0-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: invada-studio-plugins-lv2_1.2.0+repack0-2.dsc invada-studio-plugins-lv2_1.2.0+repack0-2.debian.tar.gz invada-studio-plugins-lv2_1.2.0+repack0-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your

Bug#659820: marked as done (audacious FTBFS on sparc with ICE)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:47:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#659820: fixed in audacious 3.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #659820, regarding audacious FTBFS on sparc with ICE to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

audacious_3.2-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: audacious-dbg_3.2-2_amd64.deb to main/a/audacious/audacious-dbg_3.2-2_amd64.deb audacious-dev_3.2-2_amd64.deb to main/a/audacious/audacious-dev_3.2-2_amd64.deb audacious_3.2-2.debian.tar.gz to main/a/audacious/audacious_3.2-2.debian.tar.gz audacious_3.2-2.dsc to main/a/audaciou

Re: [SCM] invada-ladspa packaging annotated tag, debian/0.3.1-1, created. debian/0.3.1-1

2012/2/19 Jaromír Mikeš : > 2012/2/19 Alessio Treglia : > >> Aren't invada LV2 plugins sufficient? > > Why not to have them both LADSPA and LV2? > >> Moreover, upstream doesn't seem active since 2009. > > Yep, but there is not too much plugins around :( Can you upload it for me pls? There is DMUA,

Re: [SCM] invada-ladspa packaging annotated tag, debian/0.3.1-1, created. debian/0.3.1-1

2012/2/19 Alessio Treglia : > Aren't invada LV2 plugins sufficient? Why not to have them both LADSPA and LV2? > Moreover, upstream doesn't seem active since 2009. Yep, but there is not too much plugins around :( mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers m

Processing of audacious_3.2-2_amd64.changes

audacious_3.2-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: audacious_3.2-2.dsc audacious_3.2-2.debian.tar.gz audacious_3.2-2_amd64.deb audacious-dbg_3.2-2_amd64.deb audacious-dev_3.2-2_amd64.deb libaudclient2_3.2-2_amd64.deb libaudcore1_3.2-2_amd64.deb Gre

Re: [SCM] invada-ladspa packaging annotated tag, debian/0.3.1-1, created. debian/0.3.1-1

On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 2:12 AM, wrote: > invada-ladspa packaging Aren't invada LV2 plugins sufficient? Moreover, upstream doesn't seem active since 2009. -- Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer         | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer    | quadris...@ub

Re: [SCM] gmerlin/master: There is no need to bump dh requirement to 9, cdbs does not actually need it so higher.

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > No need to tighten debhelper build-dependency _at_ _all_ due to > multiarch when using CDBS: Please just use CDBS auto-resolved > unversioned debhelper, unless you know better. OK, done. -- Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.

Processed: Re: idjc: socket problem

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 646588 moreinfo Bug #646588 [idjc] idjc: socket problem Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 646588: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646588 Debian Bug Tracki

Bug#646588: idjc: socket problem

tags 646588 moreinfo thanks Hi, could you try to reproduce this with the latest release 0.8.7-1 available in Debian Wheezy? Thanks in advance for any reply. -- Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer         | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer    | quadris...@

Re: [SCM] gmerlin/master: Regenerate debian/control

On 12-02-18 at 05:50pm, Alessio Treglia wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Why the tightened debhelper version? > > > > Looks like multiarch tightening, which is unneeded for CDBS! > > This [1] says different. If it is actually so, could you update that > wiki

gmerlin override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): gmerlin-data_1.0.0~dfsg-13_all.deb: package says priority is optional, override says extra. gmerlin-doc_1.0.0~dfsg-13_all.deb: package says priority is optional, override says extra. gmer

gmerlin_1.0.0~dfsg-13_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: gmerlin-data_1.0.0~dfsg-13_all.deb to main/g/gmerlin/gmerlin-data_1.0.0~dfsg-13_all.deb gmerlin-dbg_1.0.0~dfsg-13_amd64.deb to main/g/gmerlin/gmerlin-dbg_1.0.0~dfsg-13_amd64.deb gmerlin-doc_1.0.0~dfsg-13_all.deb to main/g/gmerlin/gmerlin-doc_1.0.0~dfsg-13_all.deb gmerlin-plugins-

gmusicbrowser 1.1.9-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the gmusicbrowser source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.1.8-1 Current version: 1.1.9-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will r

dirac 1.0.2-6 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the dirac source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0.2-4 Current version: 1.0.2-6 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive l

zita-resampler 1.1.0-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the zita-resampler source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.1.1-1 Current version: 1.1.0-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will

hydrogen_0.9.6~beta1-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: hydrogen_0.9.6~beta1-2.debian.tar.gz to main/h/hydrogen/hydrogen_0.9.6~beta1-2.debian.tar.gz hydrogen_0.9.6~beta1-2.dsc to main/h/hydrogen/hydrogen_0.9.6~beta1-2.dsc hydrogen_0.9.6~beta1-2_amd64.deb to main/h/hydrogen/hydrogen_0.9.6~beta1-2_amd64.deb Override entries for your p

Processing of gmerlin_1.0.0~dfsg-13_amd64.changes

gmerlin_1.0.0~dfsg-13_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gmerlin_1.0.0~dfsg-13.dsc gmerlin_1.0.0~dfsg-13.debian.tar.gz gmerlin-doc_1.0.0~dfsg-13_all.deb gmerlin-data_1.0.0~dfsg-13_all.deb libgmerlin-doc_1.0.0~dfsg-13_all.deb gmerlin_1.0.0~dfsg-13_amd6

Processing of hydrogen_0.9.6~beta1-2_amd64.changes

hydrogen_0.9.6~beta1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: hydrogen_0.9.6~beta1-2.dsc hydrogen_0.9.6~beta1-2.debian.tar.gz hydrogen_0.9.6~beta1-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___

Re: [SCM] gmerlin/master: Regenerate debian/control

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Why the tightened debhelper version? > > Looks like multiarch tightening, which is unneeded for CDBS! This [1] says different. If it is actually so, could you update that wiki page? [1] http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation --

Re: [SCM] gmerlin/master: Regenerate debian/control

On 12-02-18 at 04:40pm, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: > Regenerate debian/control > - debhelper (>= 8.1.3~), > + debhelper (>= 9), Why the tightened debhelper version? Looks like multiarch tightening, which is unneeded for CDBS! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Inter

lives 1.6.1~ds1-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the lives source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 1.6.1~ds1-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you w

audacity_2.0.0~rc1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: audacity-data_2.0.0~rc1-1_all.deb to main/a/audacity/audacity-data_2.0.0~rc1-1_all.deb audacity-dbg_2.0.0~rc1-1_amd64.deb to main/a/audacity/audacity-dbg_2.0.0~rc1-1_amd64.deb audacity_2.0.0~rc1-1.debian.tar.gz to main/a/audacity/audacity_2.0.0~rc1-1.debian.tar.gz audacity_2.0.0~

Processing of audacity_2.0.0~rc1-1_amd64.changes

audacity_2.0.0~rc1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: audacity_2.0.0~rc1-1.dsc audacity_2.0.0~rc1.orig.tar.bz2 audacity_2.0.0~rc1-1.debian.tar.gz audacity_2.0.0~rc1-1_amd64.deb audacity-data_2.0.0~rc1-1_all.deb audacity-dbg_2.0.0~rc1-1_amd64.deb Gr

Re: transcode_1.1.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Ehy Luca! On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote: > * avilib/platform* have different license terms. > * import/framegen/pink.* seems to be part of PortAudio project, which is >  licensed under Expat. Please check this information, though. > * libdldarwin/* are licensed under Expa

Re: [Luca Falavigna] transcode_1.1.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Alessio Treglia wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Reinhard Tartler > wrote: >> >> FYI. >> >> the issues seem resolvable, though! >> > > Fixed. > > I have some problem with my connection, please upload it! uploaded -- regards,     Reinhard ___

Re: [Luca Falavigna] transcode_1.1.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > FYI. > > the issues seem resolvable, though! > Fixed. I have some problem with my connection, please upload it! -- Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer         | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Develope

[Luca Falavigna] transcode_1.1.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

FYI. the issues seem resolvable, though! Cheers, Reinhard --- Begin Message --- Hi, * avilib/platform* have different license terms. * import/framegen/pink.* seems to be part of PortAudio project, which is licensed under Expat. Please check this information, though. * libdldarwin/* are licen

ghostess_20120105-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: ghostess_20120105-1.debian.tar.gz to main/g/ghostess/ghostess_20120105-1.debian.tar.gz ghostess_20120105-1.dsc to main/g/ghostess/ghostess_20120105-1.dsc ghostess_20120105-1_amd64.deb to main/g/ghostess/ghostess_20120105-1_amd64.deb ghostess_20120105.orig.tar.bz2 to main/g/ghos

Processing of ghostess_20120105-1_amd64.changes

ghostess_20120105-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ghostess_20120105-1.dsc ghostess_20120105.orig.tar.bz2 ghostess_20120105-1.debian.tar.gz ghostess_20120105-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

Processed: tagging 660139, bug 660139 is forwarded to Christophe Massiot

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 660139 + upstream Bug #660139 [src:multicat] multicat: FTBFS(!linux) Added tag(s) upstream. > forwarded 660139 Christophe Massiot Bug #660139 [src:multicat] multicat: FTBFS(!linux) Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'Christophe Massiot '. > tha

Bug#660139: Multicat fails to build on non-Linux architectures

Hi Christophe, multicat 2.0 failed to build on all Debian non-Linux architectures, you may find more information at [1]. Would you help us in solving this? Thanks in advance for any reply, cheers! [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=multicat -- Alessio Treglia          | www.ale