Hi Sebastian,
After some research I have found that this issue is caused by
the MediaWrap (v.0.1.7.3) extention.
When MediaWrap is disabled Gecko-mediaplayer works correctly.
Kind regards,
Jos v.W.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-mu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 658910 important
Bug #658910 [libdirac-dev] libdirac-dev: "Multi-Arch: same" but dirac-stdint.h
differs across architectures
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> tags 658910 patch
Bug #658910 [libdirac-dev] libdirac-dev: "Multi-A
severity 658910 important
tags 658910 patch
thanks
Hi Jakub!
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> libdirac-dev is marked as "Multi-Arch: same", but contents of
> /usr/include/dirac/libdirac_common/dirac-stdint.h is not identical across
> all architectures. Please see the diff betw
Source: libav
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Please enable hardened build flags through dpkg-buildflags.
Patch attached. The format string checks detect a missing
format string in libavcodec/srtdec.c, please contact upstream
for that.
Cheers,
Moritz
diff -aur libav-0.8.harden/debian/rul
Package: libdirac-dev
Version: 1.0.2-5
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
libdirac-dev is marked as "Multi-Arch: same", but contents of
/usr/include/dirac/libdirac_common/dirac-stdint.h is not identical
across all architectures. Please see the diff between i386 an
FYI: The status of the qjackrcd source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 1.0.5~ds0-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day yo
FYI: The status of the liblscp source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.5.6-2
Current version: 0.5.6-5
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
Accepted:
libzita-alsa-pcmi-dev_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
to main/z/zita-alsa-pcmi/libzita-alsa-pcmi-dev_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
libzita-alsa-pcmi0_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
to main/z/zita-alsa-pcmi/libzita-alsa-pcmi0_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
zita-alsa-pcmi-utils_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
to main/z/zita-alsa-pcmi/zita-alsa-pc
zita-alsa-pcmi_0.1.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
zita-alsa-pcmi_0.1.2-1.dsc
zita-alsa-pcmi_0.1.2.orig.tar.bz2
zita-alsa-pcmi_0.1.2-1.debian.tar.gz
libzita-alsa-pcmi-dev_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
libzita-alsa-pcmi0_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
zita-alsa-pcmi-uti
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 06.02.2012 14:48, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>
>> What problem would this solve?
>
>
> Reducing complexity,
really? AFAIUI, it would make the diff between the two debian/rules
files larger, which makes it harder to cherry pick changes
>
Am 06.02.2012 14:48, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
What problem would this solve?
Reducing complexity, avoiding redundant building of identical code,
stopping to pretend any -extra flavor apart from libavcodec would be
different to the regular non-extra lib.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 03.02.2012 17:11, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>
>> Well, having all packages (with tightened dependencies) is more
>> convinient for the users if libav and libav-extra become out-of-sync.
>
>
> If out-of-sync means ABI-incompatible, then t
Am 04.02.2012 12:42, schrieb Alessio Treglia:
fixed, we no longer distribute the code covered by other-2 with our tarball.
Cool, thank you so much!
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://
Am 04.02.2012 01:21, schrieb Andres Mejia:
This was the main hold up for me continuing work on packaging gpac. I
also wanted to replace gpac's use of openssl with nettle.
Thanks for the remark.
I would probably be best practice to leave a note in debian/changelog
in these cases for others to
Am 03.02.2012 17:28, schrieb Fabrice Coutadeur:
A bit off-topic, but I was planning to try to move dvdstyler from
Ubuntu to Debian, under Debian Multimedia umbrella, as all
dependencies seems to be there (still have to port it to libav 0.8
though).
Cooo, that's highly appreciated, thanks!
Am 03.02.2012 17:11, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Well, having all packages (with tightened dependencies) is more
convinient for the users if libav and libav-extra become out-of-sync.
If out-of-sync means ABI-incompatible, then the other -extra packages
won't help anyway.
Would you accept a pat
Am 03.02.2012 17:09, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I've asked debian-legal (with zero response) and then abandoned faac.
I've escalated this question to the ubuntu technical board, and
they've decided faac was redistributable but non-free. So that
wouldn't help us much.
No, we are not going to push
(new) zita-lrx_0.1.0-1.debian.tar.gz optional sound
(new) zita-lrx_0.1.0-1.dsc optional sound
(new) zita-lrx_0.1.0-1_amd64.deb optional sound
Command line jack application providing crossover filters
Command line jack application providing 2, 3, or 4-band,
4th order crossover filters.
The filter
zita-lrx_0.1.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
zita-lrx_0.1.0-1.dsc
zita-lrx_0.1.0.orig.tar.bz2
zita-lrx_0.1.0-1.debian.tar.gz
zita-lrx_0.1.0-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
_
On 02/06/2012 07:34 AM, Jos van Wolput wrote:
> At least http://nos.nl/nieuws/live/journaal24/wmv/?lowres=1
> and videos from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english still do not work.
> My Iceweasel is now v. 11.0, gecko-mediaplayer 1.0.5-1, gnome-mplayer 1.0.5-1,
> mplayer 3:1.0~rc4
Thank you. Neverth
20 matches
Mail list logo
