Processed: Re: Bug#656848: libav-dev package?

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 656848 wontfix Bug #656848 [libav] libav-dev package? Added tag(s) wontfix. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 656848: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656848 Debian Bug Tracking Sys

Bug#656848: libav-dev package?

2012-01-22 Thread Reinhard Tartler
tag 656848 wontfix stop On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Package: libav > Version: 4:0.8~beta2-3 > Severity: wishlist > > Would you mind to provide a meta package libav-dev requesting > all the other libav development pa

Re: Request for upload: supercollider 3.4.5 new version

2012-01-22 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 15:00, Dan S wrote: > > Hi - > > SuperCollider just released bugfix release 3.4.5. I've imported it > into the debian-multimedia git. Unless there are queries, could I > request someone to upload a package please? > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/superco

Bug#654395: additional patches for newer libav sources

2012-01-22 Thread John Vogel
On 01/22/2012 11:48 AM, Kevin Roy wrote: Hi John, -- First, this patch does not have anything related to this bug report so next time, you are more than welcome to open another bug report. Next, I don't know how your patch managed to "negates" the patch 0009 but if it does, it's not the good wa

Bug#656928: libraptor2-0: please add a Breaks against libraptor1 versions without symbol versioning

2012-01-22 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Package: libraptor2-0 Version: 2.0.6-1 Severity: important Justification: http://bugs.debian.org/613411 Tags: patch Hi, Adrian Knoth wrote: > The situation is as follows: > >- ardour depends on liblrdf (mind the l after lib) > - liblrdf depends on libraptor1 > >- ardour depends o

Bug#656883: marked as done (libaudiofile-dev: "Multi-Arch: same" but contains ELFs in /usr/bin)

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:47:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#656883: fixed in audiofile 0.3.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #656883, regarding libaudiofile-dev: "Multi-Arch: same" but contains ELFs in /usr/bin to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#656881: marked as done (liblscp-dev: "Multi-Arch: same" but files differ accross architectures)

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:47:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#656881: fixed in liblscp 0.5.6-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #656881, regarding liblscp-dev: "Multi-Arch: same" but files differ accross architectures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

liblscp_0.5.6-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-01-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: liblscp-dbg_0.5.6-4_amd64.deb to main/libl/liblscp/liblscp-dbg_0.5.6-4_amd64.deb liblscp-dev_0.5.6-4_amd64.deb to main/libl/liblscp/liblscp-dev_0.5.6-4_amd64.deb liblscp-doc_0.5.6-4_all.deb to main/libl/liblscp/liblscp-doc_0.5.6-4_all.deb liblscp6_0.5.6-4_amd64.deb to main/libl

audiofile_0.3.3-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-01-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: audiofile-tools_0.3.3-2_amd64.deb to main/a/audiofile/audiofile-tools_0.3.3-2_amd64.deb audiofile_0.3.3-2.debian.tar.gz to main/a/audiofile/audiofile_0.3.3-2.debian.tar.gz audiofile_0.3.3-2.dsc to main/a/audiofile/audiofile_0.3.3-2.dsc libaudiofile-dbg_0.3.3-2_amd64.deb to main

Bug#656572: marked as done (Segfaults when using vaapi)

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:33:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#656572: fixed in libav 4:0.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #656572, regarding Segfaults when using vaapi to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#655683: marked as done (libav-tools: should provide ff* compatibility symlinks)

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:33:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#655683: fixed in libav 4:0.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #655683, regarding libav-tools: should provide ff* compatibility symlinks to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

liblscp_0.5.6-4_amd64.changes is NEW

2012-01-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
liblscp-dbg_0.5.6-4_amd64.deb to main/libl/liblscp/liblscp-dbg_0.5.6-4_amd64.deb liblscp-dev_0.5.6-4_amd64.deb to main/libl/liblscp/liblscp-dev_0.5.6-4_amd64.deb (new) liblscp-doc_0.5.6-4_all.deb optional doc Documentation for LinuxSampler Control Protocol library This package is for use with

audiofile_0.3.3-2_amd64.changes is NEW

2012-01-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
(new) audiofile-tools_0.3.3-2_amd64.deb optional utils sfinfo and sfconvert tools The audiofile library allows the processing of audio data to and from audio files of many common formats (currently AIFF, AIFF-C, WAVE, NeXT/Sun, BICS, and raw data). . This package contains the sfinfo and sfconv

Processed: your mail

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 656881 pending Bug #656881 [liblscp-dev] liblscp-dev: "Multi-Arch: same" but files differ accross architectures Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 656881: http://bugs.debia

Processing of liblscp_0.5.6-4_amd64.changes

2012-01-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
liblscp_0.5.6-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: liblscp_0.5.6-4.dsc liblscp_0.5.6-4.debian.tar.gz liblscp-dbg_0.5.6-4_amd64.deb liblscp-dev_0.5.6-4_amd64.deb liblscp-doc_0.5.6-4_all.deb liblscp6_0.5.6-4_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian qu

Processed: retitle 654229 to FTBFS with libav 0.8

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 654229 FTBFS with libav 0.8 Bug #654229 [wxsvg] FTBFS with libav in experimental Changed Bug title to 'FTBFS with libav 0.8' from 'FTBFS with libav in experimental' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Processed: retitle 654212 to FTBFS with libav 0.8

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 654212 FTBFS with libav 0.8 Bug #654212 {Done: Benjamin Drung } [audacity] FTBFS with libav in experimental Changed Bug title to 'FTBFS with libav 0.8' from 'FTBFS with libav in experimental' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please co

Processed: retitle 654183 to FTBFS with libav 0.8

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 654183 FTBFS with libav 0.8 Bug #654183 [ffms2] FTBFS with libav in experimental Changed Bug title to 'FTBFS with libav 0.8' from 'FTBFS with libav in experimental' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Bug#651029: marked as done (Please enable multiarch/hardening)

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:21:07 +0100 with message-id and subject line Closing #651029 has caused the Debian Bug report #651029, regarding Please enable multiarch/hardening to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#641388: marked as done (libaudiofile-dev: audiofile is old and has several problems reading files. There is a newer version, 0.3.0)

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:22:21 +0100 with message-id and subject line Closing #641388 has caused the Debian Bug report #641388, regarding libaudiofile-dev: audiofile is old and has several problems reading files. There is a newer version, 0.3.0 to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#586172: marked as done (add example of -timestamp format to man page)

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:17:11 +0100 with message-id <87mx9ffq60@faui43f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> and subject line Re: Bug#586172: add example of -timestamp format to man page has caused the Debian Bug report #586172, regarding add example of -timestamp format to man page to be

Bug#656910: Group "audio" is used for two incompatible things

2012-01-22 Thread David Henningsson
Package: jackd2 Severity: normal Version: 1.9.8~dfsg.1-1 The "audio" group has a special meaning in standard desktop usage - as defined in udev rules, it gives access to sound devices to users in that group, thereby overriding/complementing Consolekit's automatic permission assignment (which a

Processing of audiofile_0.3.3-2_amd64.changes

2012-01-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
audiofile_0.3.3-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: audiofile_0.3.3-2.dsc audiofile_0.3.3-2.debian.tar.gz audiofile-tools_0.3.3-2_amd64.deb libaudiofile-dev_0.3.3-2_amd64.deb libaudiofile1_0.3.3-2_amd64.deb libaudiofile-dbg_0.3.3-2_amd64.deb Greetin

Processed: your mail

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 656883 pending Bug #656883 [libaudiofile-dev] libaudiofile-dev: "Multi-Arch: same" but contains ELFs in /usr/bin Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 656883: http://bugs.debi

Bug#655708: mudita24: meters don't work

2012-01-22 Thread Raffaele Morelli
2012/1/22 Niels Mayer > > yes, the bug is still reproducible with svn13-2. > > There is a patch to this issue. As I cannot test this patch right now, > could you please verify that the patch from > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/2012-January/032645.html > resolves this is

Bug#562677: marked as done (audiofile needs largefile support)

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:12:26 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: audiofile needs largefile support has caused the Debian Bug report #562677, regarding audiofile needs largefile support to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed: Re: Bug#656850: MPlayer recommends libbluray1 which in turn recommends libbluray-bdj which requires JRE so the default mplayer install brings java "bloat" to the system

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 656850 libbluray1 Bug #656850 [mplayer] MPlayer recommends libbluray1 which in turn recommends libbluray-bdj which requires JRE so the default mplayer install brings java "bloat" to the system Bug reassigned from package 'mplayer' to 'l

Bug#656850: MPlayer recommends libbluray1 which in turn recommends libbluray-bdj which requires JRE so the default mplayer install brings java "bloat" to the system

2012-01-22 Thread Reinhard Tartler
reassign 656850 libbluray1 stop On So, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:40:36 (CET), Paul Fertser wrote: > Package: mplayer > Version: 2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn34540-1 > Severity: minor > > Trying to install mplayer on a system with default apt configuration > results in installing all the recommended packages as we

Bug#654395: marked as done ([blender] Segmentation fault on startup)

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:54:39 +0100 with message-id <4f1c3f4f.7010...@gmail.com> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #654395, regarding [blender] Segmentation fault on startup to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#654395: additional patches for newer libav sources

2012-01-22 Thread Kevin Roy
Hi John, Le 19/01/2012 09:51, John Vogel a écrit : > I had the same problem with blender 2.61-1 segfaulting on my wheezy/sid > box. This bug has been fixed in git repository with the commit ed82a2a > So I went about trying to build from git. Right away had problems > with missing headers declar

Bug#656883: libaudiofile-dev: "Multi-Arch: same" but contains ELFs in /usr/bin

2012-01-22 Thread Jakub Wilk
Package: libaudiofile-dev Version: 0.3.3-1 User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: multiarch libaudiofile-dev is marked as "Multi-Arch: same" but it contains two ELF binaries in /usr/bin: $ dpkg -L libaudiofile-dev | grep /bin/ | xargs file | grep ELF /usr/bin/sfinfo:

Bug#656881: liblscp-dev: "Multi-Arch: same" but files differ accross architectures

2012-01-22 Thread Jakub Wilk
Package: liblscp-dev Version: 0.5.6-3 User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: multiarch This package is marked as "Multi-Arch: same", but it contains HTML documentation (generated at build time) with timestamps that differ accross architectures, e.g.: -Generated on Mon Jan 16

Bug#655708: mudita24: meters don't work

2012-01-22 Thread Niels Mayer
> yes, the bug is still reproducible with svn13-2. There is a patch to this issue. As I cannot test this patch right now, could you please verify that the patch from http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/2012-January/032645.html resolves this issue. Once verified, I'll checkin the

Processed: your mail

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 655708 - moreinfo Bug #655708 [mudita24] mudita24: meters don't work Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 655708: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=655708 De

Bug#655708: mudita24: meters don't work

2012-01-22 Thread Raffaele Morelli
2012/1/22 Alessio Treglia > tags 655708 moreinfo > thanks > > Hello Raffaele, > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Raffaele Morelli > wrote: > > you're welcome, feel free to ask if needed. > > Few days ago I uploaded a new SVN snapshot, would you check if this > bug is still reproducible with th

jackd installation, audio group?

2012-01-22 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
Would it be terribly difficult to include a choice for adding users to audio group during the installation of jackd? Adding /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf only solves half the problem, and wouldn't it just make is so much easier if the user(s) would also become member of audio group in the

Processed: Re: Bug#655708: mudita24: meters don't work

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 655708 moreinfo Bug #655708 [mudita24] mudita24: meters don't work Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #655708 to the same tags previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 655708: http://

Bug#655708: mudita24: meters don't work

2012-01-22 Thread Alessio Treglia
tags 655708 moreinfo thanks Hello Raffaele, On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Raffaele Morelli wrote: > you're welcome, feel free to ask if needed. Few days ago I uploaded a new SVN snapshot, would you check if this bug is still reproducible with the latest mudita24 1.0.3+svn13-2 available in si

Bug#656693: Tried again using upstream git

2012-01-22 Thread Chris Boot
Today I tried again, this time just running debuild over the package source. The resulting package did not crash. -- Chris Boot bo...@bootc.net ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://li

Bug#656850: MPlayer recommends libbluray1 which in turn recommends libbluray-bdj which requires JRE so the default mplayer install brings java "bloat" to the system

2012-01-22 Thread Paul Fertser
Package: mplayer Version: 2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn34540-1 Severity: minor Trying to install mplayer on a system with default apt configuration results in installing all the recommended packages as well which necessarily brings in some headless Java variant as libbluray-bdj dependency which is recommend

Processed: your mail

2012-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 656793 ! Bug #656793 [dvbcut] Port the Qt4 patch from cmake to autoconf Owner recorded as Fabrice Coutadeur . > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 656793: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b

Bug#656848: libav-dev package?

2012-01-22 Thread Harald Dunkel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: libav Version: 4:0.8~beta2-3 Severity: wishlist Would you mind to provide a meta package libav-dev requesting all the other libav development packages in the same version? This could make writing package build dependencies much easier. Many