Re: request sponsor for / upload of pd-pdstring

2011-12-01 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Nov 29, 2011, at 6:00 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 04:53, Roman Haefeli wrote: >> >> If time allows, > > Finally some time... :/ > >> could you also have a look at pd-pdstring? It's been >> waiting for some time and I have ironed out all issues that were >> discussed

Re: ignoring autotool in debian/copyright?

2011-12-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 11-12-01 at 04:25pm, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 16:12, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > On 11-12-01 at 03:56pm, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 15:25, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> >> > I sure prefer if you are not lazy but instead respectful to those > >> >> >

Re: ignoring autotool in debian/copyright?

2011-12-01 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 16:12, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 11-12-01 at 03:56pm, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 15:25, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> >> > I sure prefer if you are not lazy but instead respectful to those >> >> > developers that put effort into inventing and maintainin

Re: ignoring autotool in debian/copyright?

2011-12-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 11-12-01 at 03:56pm, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 15:25, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> > I sure prefer if you are not lazy but instead respectful to those > >> > developers that put effort into inventing and maintaining a tool > >> > that is clearly good enough that you use i

Re: ignoring autotool in debian/copyright?

2011-12-01 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 15:25, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> > I sure prefer if you are not lazy but instead respectful to those >> > developers that put effort into inventing and maintaining a tool >> > that is clearly good enough that you use it. >> >> hmm, i don't think this is about not respecting

Re: ignoring autotool in debian/copyright?

2011-12-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 11-12-01 at 12:13am, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 00:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > On 11-11-21 at 11:25am, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >> On 2011-11-21 03:26, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> > Looks like there is a strange thing with the install-sh section > >> > in debian/cop

Re: ignoring autotool in debian/copyright?

2011-12-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 11-12-01 at 11:26am, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > the reason why i started this discussion is not because i don't care > about licensing of those files; but that i think - as felipe has > already pointed out - that "properly" documenting those files as is > currently suggested only creates no

Nuova attività di Picasa Web Album

2011-12-01 Thread Picasa Web Album
Picasa Web Album Caricamenti recenti Alessio Treglia ha aggiunto 5 foto a UDS-P 30-nov-2011 10.16.28 Pubblica commento Annulla l'iscrizione a questo utente. Per condividere le tue foto o ricevere notifiche ogni volta che i tuoi amici condividono le proprie immagini, START_LINKcrea il tuo

Re: ignoring autotool in debian/copyright?

2011-12-01 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-11-30 04:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > You can (with your Debian hat on, I am not talking about upstream here) > repackage the source to *not* include the autogenerated files as part of > Debian distributed sources. IF the files truly are on

Re: ignoring autotool in debian/copyright?

2011-12-01 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 01.12.2011 10:18, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: And thinking more about it, source packages do already have proper copyright information in the source package, mostly in some COPYING or README file or in the respective sources. So legally, there is no necessity to collect and condense all this inf

Re: ignoring autotool in debian/copyright?

2011-12-01 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Do, Dez 01, 2011 at 09:57:44 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 01.12.2011 08:20, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: >> Thank you very much for stating your opinion such clearly. I fully >> concur with your view on DEP-5! > > While I also agree with your opinion with regard to documenting the > licensi

Re: ignoring autotool in debian/copyright?

2011-12-01 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 01.12.2011 08:20, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: Thank you very much for stating your opinion such clearly. I fully concur with your view on DEP-5! While I also agree with your opinion with regard to documenting the licensing of auto-generated files (and most parts of the GNU auto* build system

Re: ignoring autotool in debian/copyright?

2011-12-01 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Do, Dez 01, 2011 at 04:13:35 (CET), Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 00:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> On 11-11-21 at 11:25am, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >>> On 2011-11-21 03:26, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> > Looks like there is a strange thing with the install-sh section in >>> >