Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:02:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#629702: fixed in pd-boids 1.1.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #629702,
regarding pd-boids: FTBFS: boids2d.c:20:22: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file
or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)
to be marked a
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:02:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#629701: fixed in pd-beatpipe 0.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #629701,
regarding pd-beatpipe: FTBFS: beatpipe.c:26:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such
file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)
to be mar
Accepted:
pd-boids_1.1.1-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/pd-boids/pd-boids_1.1.1-2.debian.tar.gz
pd-boids_1.1.1-2.dsc
to main/p/pd-boids/pd-boids_1.1.1-2.dsc
pd-boids_1.1.1-2_amd64.deb
to main/p/pd-boids/pd-boids_1.1.1-2_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
pd-boids_1.1.1-2.dsc - sourc
Accepted:
pd-beatpipe_0.1-3.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/pd-beatpipe/pd-beatpipe_0.1-3.debian.tar.gz
pd-beatpipe_0.1-3.dsc
to main/p/pd-beatpipe/pd-beatpipe_0.1-3.dsc
pd-beatpipe_0.1-3_amd64.deb
to main/p/pd-beatpipe/pd-beatpipe_0.1-3_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
pd-beatpipe_0
pd-boids_1.1.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pd-boids_1.1.1-2.dsc
pd-boids_1.1.1-2.debian.tar.gz
pd-boids_1.1.1-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
___
pd-beatpipe_0.1-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pd-beatpipe_0.1-3.dsc
pd-beatpipe_0.1-3.debian.tar.gz
pd-beatpipe_0.1-3_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
___
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:41, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Jun 13, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:20, Hans-Christoph Steiner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here are my lowest priority uploads, but I hope to get them uploaded in
>>> time
>>> to be included in U
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jun 2011 23:47:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#629700: fixed in pd-bassemu 0.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #629700,
regarding pd-bassemu: FTBFS: bassemu~.c:5:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file
or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)
to be marked
Accepted:
pd-bassemu_0.3-3.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/pd-bassemu/pd-bassemu_0.3-3.debian.tar.gz
pd-bassemu_0.3-3.dsc
to main/p/pd-bassemu/pd-bassemu_0.3-3.dsc
pd-bassemu_0.3-3_amd64.deb
to main/p/pd-bassemu/pd-bassemu_0.3-3_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
pd-bassemu_0.3-3.dsc -
pd-bassemu_0.3-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pd-bassemu_0.3-3.dsc
pd-bassemu_0.3-3.debian.tar.gz
pd-bassemu_0.3-3_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
___
(new) pd-moonlib_0.2-2.debian.tar.gz optional sound
(new) pd-moonlib_0.2-2.dsc optional sound
(new) pd-moonlib_0.2-2_amd64.deb optional sound
library of Pd objects related to GUI control
Moonlib includes three sub-sections: nilib, which is a kind of wrapper
between Pd and Gtk, sublib, which is a
pd-moonlib_0.2-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pd-moonlib_0.2-2.dsc
pd-moonlib_0.2.orig.tar.gz
pd-moonlib_0.2-2.debian.tar.gz
pd-moonlib_0.2-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
__
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 23:50, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> A gentle ping looking for an upload. I'd love to make the Ubuntu/oneiric
> import deadline.
Uploaded, with some modifications (in this case, given the import
deadline I just went ahead with it instead of pointing out what needs
to
FYI: The status of the phasex source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.12.0+m1-3
Current version: 0.12.0+m1-5
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
FYI: The status of the dino source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.2.8-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will r
FYI: The status of the pd-freeverb source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.2-2
Current version: 1.2-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the ladish source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.3-7
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will r
FYI: The status of the pd-plugin source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.2.1-2
Current version: 0.2.1-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will recei
Adrian,
I've been reviewing ardour3 to upload it soon, please ask upstream to
fix the following licensing issues:
> Files: ./gtk2_ardour/canvas-imageframe.c,
> ./gtk2_ardour/canvas-imageframe.h
> Copyright: 1998, The Free Software Foundation
> License: UNKNOWN
> FIXME
Those files comple
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Jeremy Salwen wrote:
> Alessio, in the workflow you described, the upstream.trunk branch is what I
> was referring to as "intermediate packaging work"
>
> I have an account on alioth (jeremysalwen-guest) and I requested to join the
> team a little while ago, but I
Am 22.06.2011 11:00, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
He doesn't merge everything, only stuff that he likes.
But the release announcement says:
"...it includes all changes from ffmpeg-mt and libav. "
^^^^
___
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:47:01 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 22.06.2011 10:45, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>> Neat, no? I'm busy preparing the Libav 0.7 release, then FFmpeg does a
>> git merge from libav.org and quickly publishes both 0.7 and 0.8.
>> Cool, uh?
>
> I just don't get it.
>
>
Am 22.06.2011 10:45, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Neat, no? I'm busy preparing the Libav 0.7 release, then FFmpeg does a
git merge from libav.org and quickly publishes both 0.7 and 0.8.
Cool, uh?
I just don't get it.
Why does he merge back the code of the fork that split off of ffmpeg
for his ig
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:05:36 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 18.06.2011 10:54, schrieb A Mennucc:
>> accordind to debian/copyright both source packages above are
>> tracking libav.org ... wouldn't it be better if the latter would be
>> used to track (and maybe package) the ffmpeg.org cod
Am 18.06.2011 10:54, schrieb A Mennucc:
accordind to debian/copyright both source packages above are
tracking libav.org ... wouldn't it be better if the latter would be
used to track (and maybe package) the ffmpeg.org codebase ?
In this (or at least related) context...
http://www.ffmpeg.org/
25 matches
Mail list logo
