On 11-06-11 at 09:30pm, rosea grammostola wrote:
> Hey,
>
> This question is slightly OT...
>
> I try to backport qjackctl 0.3.7 to Ubuntu 10.04. But the Debian
> package depends on dos2unix, which is not in the Ubuntu Lucid build
> environment. Is it possible to rm the dependency on dos2unix, ho
Reject Reasons:
pd-libdir_1.9-2_i386.changes file already known to dak
pd-libdir_1.9-2_i386.deb: can not overwrite existing copy already in the
archive.
md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of pd-libdir_1.9-2_i386.deb.
md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of pd-libdir_1.9-2.dsc.
pd-libdir_1.9-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pd-libdir_1.9-2.dsc
pd-libdir_1.9-2.debian.tar.gz
pd-libdir_1.9-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
___
p
Just to reiterate, the plan is to drop those patches now that
puredata-dev provides all the needed headers. But first, I just want to
fix the current bug that prevents these packages from building at all,
and let the dust settle on the very new reorg of 'puredata' into
'puredata-dev', 'puredata-c
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:30 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:45, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:41 -0300, "Felipe Sateler"
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 21:55, Felipe Sateler
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 19:08, Felipe
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:03:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#629798: fixed in pd-plugin 0.2.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #629798,
regarding pd-plugin: FTBFS: plugin~.h:2:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file
or directory (missing B-D on puredata-dev)
to be marke
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:03:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#629709: fixed in pd-freeverb 1.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #629709,
regarding pd-freeverb: FTBFS: freeverb~.c:34:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such
file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)
to be ma
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:18 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I'm confused. You make a change for puredata >= 0.43. Does this break
> puredata <0.43? The Depends field suggests that (puredata-core is non
> existent until 0.43). If so, the build-depends on puredata << 0.43 is
> wrong.
puredata << 0.43
Accepted:
pd-plugin_0.2.1-3.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/pd-plugin/pd-plugin_0.2.1-3.debian.tar.gz
pd-plugin_0.2.1-3.dsc
to main/p/pd-plugin/pd-plugin_0.2.1-3.dsc
pd-plugin_0.2.1-3_i386.deb
to main/p/pd-plugin/pd-plugin_0.2.1-3_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
pd-plugin_0.2.1-3.dsc
Accepted:
pd-freeverb_1.2-3.debian.tar.gz
to main/p/pd-freeverb/pd-freeverb_1.2-3.debian.tar.gz
pd-freeverb_1.2-3.dsc
to main/p/pd-freeverb/pd-freeverb_1.2-3.dsc
pd-freeverb_1.2-3_i386.deb
to main/p/pd-freeverb/pd-freeverb_1.2-3_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
pd-freeverb_1.2
pd-freeverb_1.2-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pd-freeverb_1.2-3.dsc
pd-freeverb_1.2-3.debian.tar.gz
pd-freeverb_1.2-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
_
pd-plugin_0.2.1-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pd-plugin_0.2.1-3.dsc
pd-plugin_0.2.1-3.debian.tar.gz
pd-plugin_0.2.1-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
_
On 11-06-11 at 03:07pm, Dan S wrote:
> It would be great if others can comment - anyone?
I've updated debian/copyright. Please check the FIXMEs in that file!
Regards,
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quot
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 21:30 +0200, rosea grammostola wrote:
> Hey,
>
> This question is slightly OT...
>
> I try to backport qjackctl 0.3.7 to Ubuntu 10.04. But the Debian package
> depends on dos2unix, which is not in the Ubuntu Lucid build environment.
> Is it possible to rm the dependency on
All these packages seem to build-depend on puredata-dev | puredata (<<
0.43). While for some this is harmless, I believe there is no reason
to keep the patch that adds the required headers. I would suggest just
dropping support for older puredatas.
Sorry for taking so long, I've been extra busy.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:45, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:41 -0300, "Felipe Sateler"
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 21:55, Felipe Sateler
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 19:08, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 03:37, Hans-Christoph St
Hey,
This question is slightly OT...
I try to backport qjackctl 0.3.7 to Ubuntu 10.04. But the Debian package
depends on dos2unix, which is not in the Ubuntu Lucid build environment.
Is it possible to rm the dependency on dos2unix, how?
In debian/rules I find:
install/qjackctl::
# Fix e
I'm confused. You make a change for puredata >= 0.43. Does this break
puredata <0.43? The Depends field suggests that (puredata-core is non
existent until 0.43). If so, the build-depends on puredata << 0.43 is
wrong.
Also, doesn't 0.43 bring in the required headers? I think the
add_required_headers
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:04:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#629619: fixed in vlc 1.1.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #629619,
regarding VLC cannot be selected as the default video player in GNOME 3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:04:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#622935: fixed in vlc 1.1.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #622935,
regarding vlc: libdvdread errors while playing ogg files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:04:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#622879: fixed in vlc 1.1.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #622879,
regarding vlc: please add smb as supported protocol to .desktop file (needed
for KDE)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:04:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#488771: fixed in vlc 1.1.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #488771,
regarding vlc: podcast support?? the package description claims: "no way"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Accepted:
libvlc-dev_1.1.10-1_amd64.deb
to main/v/vlc/libvlc-dev_1.1.10-1_amd64.deb
libvlc5_1.1.10-1_amd64.deb
to main/v/vlc/libvlc5_1.1.10-1_amd64.deb
libvlccore-dev_1.1.10-1_amd64.deb
to main/v/vlc/libvlccore-dev_1.1.10-1_amd64.deb
libvlccore4_1.1.10-1_amd64.deb
to main/v/vlc/libvlccor
vlc_1.1.10-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
vlc_1.1.10-1.dsc
vlc_1.1.10.orig.tar.bz2
vlc_1.1.10-1.debian.tar.gz
libvlc-dev_1.1.10-1_amd64.deb
libvlc5_1.1.10-1_amd64.deb
libvlccore-dev_1.1.10-1_amd64.deb
libvlccore4_1.1.10-1_amd64.deb
mozilla-p
Queridos Belove uno.
Es para mí un placer contactar con usted para un negocio que me propongo
establecer con usted en su país, aunque no hemos visto antes, pero uno tiene
que creer en alguien antes de tener un éxito.
Tengo 21 años de edad el único hijo de mi padre a finales de última hora
FYI: The status of the zita-rev1 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.1.1-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you w
FYI: The status of the ebumeter source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.1.0~dfsg-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day y
FYI: The status of the naspro-bridges source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.2.91-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day
On 11-06-11 at 03:07pm, Dan S wrote:
> It would be great if others can comment - anyone?
I did a quick look (don't expect much involvement - am involved in too
much at the moment already, and have some deadlines in RL too).
This looks bad:
> # The build system apparently can't handle this
> CXX
2011/5/17 Felipe Sateler :
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 09:04, Dan S wrote:
>> 2011/5/15 Felipe Sateler :
>>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 06:07, Dan S wrote:
2011/5/11 Felipe Sateler :
> Hi, sorry for taking so long.
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 15:57, Dan S wrote:
>> 2011/4/16 Feli
Hi Klaus,
Run Audacious with the --verbose option and post the output that it
gives. Also run in GDB and get a backtrace.
-- John
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debi
Accepted:
gmidimonitor_3.5+20110611.git0ca423b0-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/g/gmidimonitor/gmidimonitor_3.5+20110611.git0ca423b0-1.debian.tar.gz
gmidimonitor_3.5+20110611.git0ca423b0-1.dsc
to main/g/gmidimonitor/gmidimonitor_3.5+20110611.git0ca423b0-1.dsc
gmidimonitor_3.5+20110611.git0ca423b0
gmidimonitor_3.5+20110611.git0ca423b0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
gmidimonitor_3.5+20110611.git0ca423b0-1.dsc
gmidimonitor_3.5+20110611.git0ca423b0.orig.tar.bz2
gmidimonitor_3.5+20110611.git0ca423b0-1.debian.tar.gz
gmidimonitor_3.5+20110611
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 605782 + pending
Bug #605782 [jack-rack] Please add racks (presets) to jack-rack
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
605782: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
34 matches
Mail list logo
