On Dec 24, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 21:13, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
Just ITPed, packaged and uploaded pd-hid to git.debian.org. It is an
object for Pure Data that allows you to use USB HID devices in Pd.
The
build system is similar in structur
On Dec 24, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 02:10:27PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 00:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
I just pushed some changes to pd-cyclone that create a split-out
binary package called 'cyclist'. As far as I
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 02:10:27PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 00:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
I just pushed some changes to pd-cyclone that create a split-out
binary package called 'cyclist'. As far as I understand it, I don't
need to ITP this new 'cyclist' pa
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 21:13, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Just ITPed, packaged and uploaded pd-hid to git.debian.org. It is an
> object for Pure Data that allows you to use USB HID devices in Pd. The
> build system is similar in structure to pd-plugin and pd-freeverb, plus
> it includes t
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 00:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> I just pushed some changes to pd-cyclone that create a split-out binary
> package called 'cyclist'. As far as I understand it, I don't need to ITP
> this new 'cyclist' package since its split off of the pd-cyclone source
> package,
FYI: The status of the icecast2 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.3.2-5
Current version: 2.3.2-6
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receiv
On 12/24/2010 03:35 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 03:07:47PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 12/24/2010 02:25 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I suggest as a next step to put it up at http://wiki.debian.org/
somewhere.
[snip]
I would like to get some more feedback from this
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 03:07:47PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 12/24/2010 02:25 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I suggest as a next step to put it up at http://wiki.debian.org/
somewhere.
[snip]
I would like to get some more feedback from this list first. You could
think of more menu entrie
On 12/24/2010 02:25 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Good.
I suggest as a next step to put it up at http://wiki.debian.org/
somewhere. And then ask again here if anyone has
additions/corrections/whatever - and when done (even if complete
silence for a few weeks) file a bugreport against debian-po
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:34:54AM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 12/24/2010 01:53 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Great that you put attention to this!
Thanks for your 0.02 ct
Nooo, no, no: Denmark is neither US nor part of Euroland.
Those were my 5 øre ;-)
I tried to keep it as simple a
On 12/24/2010 02:01 AM, i...@bandshed.net wrote:
Hi,
The problem is in my experience that even if you make a menu with
alternative additional sub menus most packagers create their launchers to
strict freedesktop.org standards and the end user or distributor has to
manually edit and allocate laun
On 12/24/2010 01:53 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Great that you put attention to this!
Thanks for your 0.02 ct
An extra menu package dosn't feel very Debian to me, though. Debian
logic is to propose a change to Debian Policy to have the improved
organisation apply universally, not only when
12 matches
Mail list logo
