Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 595882 xulrunner-dev
Bug #595882 [vlc] vlc: FTBFS in squeeze: configure: error: Please install the
Firefox development tools; mozilla-config.h, plugin/npapi.h and
plugin/npruntime.h were not found.
Bug reassigned from package 'vlc' to '
On Di, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:42:05 (CEST), Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> Package 'libxul' requires 'nspr >= 4.8.6' but version of NSPR is 4.8.4
>> Package 'libxul' requires 'nspr >= 4.8.6' but version of NSPR is 4.8.4
>> checking npfunctions.h usability... no
>> checking npfunctions.h presence... no
>> ch
Package: vlc
Version: 1.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100906 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in a squeeze chroot, your package failed
to build on amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/
On 2010-09-06 17:49, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Every tarball should have a file in it that contains the license.
> Having that be a standard name like LICENSE.txt makes it really easy to
> find for people who are doing things like packaging Pd libraries for
> Debian. Also, the LICENSE.tx
On Sep 6, 2010, at 4:02 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2010-09-02 11:20, Roman Haefeli wrote:
I really don't get the logic of _adding_ a license at all.
this is only because of some attempts to uniform the build process for
pd-externals (nothing to do with debian), which makes some hard
Dear Debian multimedia package maintainers,
I'm one of the developers of the project called "linux-minidisc" [1]. The goal
of your project is
to bring full and free software support for all NetMD and HiMD MiniDisc
recorders and players.
Both NetMD and HiMD offer technologies to connect a MiniDis
Maintainer: Debian multimedia packages maintainers
Uploader: Konstantinos Margaritis
Host: debian-ports.org
Accepted: ffmpeg_0.5.2-4+armhf_armhf.changes
Files:
ffmpeg_0.5.2-4+armhf.dsc
ffmpeg_0.5.2-4+armhf.diff.gz
ffmpeg_0.5.2-4+armhf_armhf.deb
ffmpeg-dbg_0.5.2-4+armhf_armhf.deb
ffmpeg-doc_0.5.2
Hi,
There is a new upstream version with manpage now. I tried to merge it, but I
do get patches related messages when running git-buildpackage.
The short howto on the multimedia wiki says
"resolve merge conflicts, review your changes e.g. with gitk"
How to check if there are conflicts and how t
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:16:26 +0200
with message-id <8739tnvzhh@faui44a.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
and subject line Sparc binaries have arrived in the archive
has caused the Debian Bug report #591802,
regarding FTBFS on sparc: [po/fr/LC_MESSAGES/csound5.mo] Error -11
to be marke
OK, it seems only debian-multimedia has the problem. I'll tell
maril...@debian.org to please see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595691 .
P.S., the way the progress messages appear, one cannot tell which server
we are working with, but instead the last transaction completed etc.
Am 06.09.2010 09:41, schrieb Michal Suchanek:
And jackd depends on jackd2 | jackd1.
Unless it's actually jackd1 and conflicts with jackd2.
In stable, yes. But the version of jack-rack that you filed this bug
report against is from testing/unstable and here jackd is a
meta-package that allows
On 2010-09-02 11:20, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>>
>> I really don't get the logic of _adding_ a license at all.
>>
this is only because of some attempts to uniform the build process for
pd-externals (nothing to do with debian), which makes some hardcoded
assumptions about what should be in a tarball/in
On 4 September 2010 22:13, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 04/09/10 16:04, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> Package: jack-rack
>> Version: 1.4.7-2+b1
>> Severity: normal
>>
>>
>> jack-rack can use libjack-jackd2-0 but depends unconditionally on jackd.
>
> And jackd depends on jackd2 | jackd1.
Unless it's act
13 matches
Mail list logo
