Hi Ryan!
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Ryan Kavanagh wrote:
> Would anybody else in DMPM be interested in having CMus in the git repository?
Here I am :)
> I have a package ready with the new upstream release and several bug fixes.
>
Please upload the package to Alioth [1] and let me know w
Hi,
I've been going ahead in splitting the package different way, I was
intended to give users the chance to install both versions.
Anyway, since we are a team and I'm the only one who believes that
would be useful :) there is no problem to me to revert the changes
done and make things back.
I'l
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 04:49:11PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 16:41, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Do we have access to any documents upstream which supports the
claim that all contributions have been made under the GFDL?
I don't think so. However, if the code is released
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 16:41, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> Do we have access to any documents upstream which supports the claim
>>> that all contributions have been made under the GFDL?
>>
>> I don't think so. However, if the code is released under a certain
>> license, and I c
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 04:16:03PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 15:54, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 03:04:32PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 14:57, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:11:39PM -0400, Felipe Sat
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 15:54, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 03:04:32PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 14:57, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:11:39PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 14:01, Jo
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 03:04:32PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 14:57, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:11:39PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 14:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
If all contributions not originating from MIT have b
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 14:57, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:11:39PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 14:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>>> If all contributions not originating from MIT have been tracked using CVS
>>> at SourceForge, it should be po
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:11:39PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 14:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
If all contributions not originating from MIT have been tracked using
CVS at SourceForge, it should be possible to get a list of account
names from there, to at least know h
Hi,
Would anybody else in DMPM be interested in having CMus in the git repository?
I use it daily and adopted the package a couple of hours ago.
CMus is:
Description: lightweight ncurses audio player
C* Music Player is a modular and very configurable ncurses-based audio
player.
It
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 14:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:18:26PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> OK, this is a draft of what I'm going to put in debian/copyright.
>> Comments?
>>
>> The csound manual has a long and complicated history. You can read it in
>> the manu
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:18:26PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
OK, this is a draft of what I'm going to put in debian/copyright. Comments?
The csound manual has a long and complicated history. You can read it
in the manual itself. That history makes it impossible to pinpoint
who did what c
FYI: The status of the zynjacku source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 5.2-1
Current version: 5.2-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
la
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:02, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:24:11AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 05:23, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:43:22PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I'm sorry if I'm being annoying w
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:24:11AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 05:23, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:43:22PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I'm sorry if I'm being annoying with this thing, but I'm trying to
really understand the issue here.
On Tue,
Package: lives
Version: 1.3.3-2
Severity: normal
I believe this is a violation of the Debian policy. See:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s-menus
The package should include a /usr/share/menu/lives file. Something like
?package(lives):\
needs="X11" \
sectio
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 05:23, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:43:22PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> I'm sorry if I'm being annoying with this thing, but I'm trying to
>> really understand the issue here.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 20:49, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
Bonjour
Je me nomme THEODORE CADET Je suis d'origine française résident à Londres et je
travail dans le domaine pétrolier.Je dispose d'un capital de 3.100.000€ qui
servira à octroyer des prêts aux particuliers à court et long terme à un taux
de 3,5% d'intérêt l'an. Vous pouvez rembourser sur
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:07:38PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:29:47 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 07:41:31AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 23:16:52 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:08, R
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:29:47 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 07:41:31AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 23:16:52 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:44:03
Am 30.06.2010 11:46, schrieb Adrian Knoth:
The way you do it right now is limiting, you either have pulse or JACK.
To me, having both in one package seems more reasonable than avoiding a
dependency on either pulse or jack with specialised packages.
Especially since the mhwaveedit package merely
Hi Alessio!
I'm seeing you continue to split the mhwaveedit package. As already
asked a few days ago: Why do you lower the flexibility of having one
package that works with every supported audio backend?
The way you do it right now is limiting, you either have pulse or JACK.
To me, having both in
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 07:41:31AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 23:16:52 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:44:03 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:14, Fabian Greffr
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 09:32:07AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 29.06.2010 19:23, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Correct. As the very first sentence of its manpage says:
Check and list dependencies of development library packages
He? IMHO this is neither right nor common practice.
The "depen
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:43:22PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I'm sorry if I'm being annoying with this thing, but I'm trying to
really understand the issue here.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 20:49, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
We only have detailed copyright information for the few scripts we
alrea
Am 29.06.2010 19:23, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Correct. As the very first sentence of its manpage says:
Check and list dependencies of development library packages
He? IMHO this is neither right nor common practice.
The "dependencies of development library packages" are not necessarily
the -
Am 29.06.2010 17:44, schrieb Felipe Sateler:
If the objective is to use at least the released version (and not a
svn snapshot), I think the correct approach would be to use 4:0.6.0~,
and not include the debian revision. This, however, would mean
changing the version from 4:0.6-1 to 4:0.6.0-1
I
27 matches
Mail list logo
