On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 02:30:52AM -0400, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
> (I really wish that I could bisect using 'git'. Does the 'audacity'
> upstream use 'git', or do the Debian maintainers have their own 'git'
> repo where they merge new versions from upstream? I am merely a
http://packages
I didn't accomplish very much after work tonight toward debugging this
problem, but I have some new information to report.
Since 'audacity' was working for me just a few months ago, I decided I
wanted to try to locate an earlier version that works on my hardware. I
looked at /usr/share/doc/au
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 19:21:09 (CEST), adiknoth-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
> The following commit has been merged in the master.jackd1 branch:
> commit de52e3664f1ca37f43b483e0963a0f323f453932
> Author: Adrian Knoth
> Date: Mon Jun 14 19:11:00 2010 +0200
>
> make jackd1 conflic
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 06:11:08PM -0400, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
> *vol = snd_mixer_find_selem(dev->handle, sid);
> i = 530
> In stack frame #2, we clearly have a value of 530 in "i". When did
> that happen, since last we saw "i" was just set to 0?
Weird.
> This must mean that t
I can confirm that the bug is fixed now, could you please release a new
package of smplayer?
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:38:10 +0200
with message-id <20100614193810.gl14...@ltw.loris.tv>
and subject line Outdated
has caused the Debian Bug report #412939,
regarding audacity: Default ALSA playback device fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:35:54 +0200
with message-id <20100614193554.gk14...@ltw.loris.tv>
and subject line Outdated
has caused the Debian Bug report #423795,
regarding audacity: Audacity does not start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:34:10 +0200
with message-id <20100614193410.gj14...@ltw.loris.tv>
and subject line Very old version
has caused the Debian Bug report #502447,
regarding audacity: crashes on startup
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> retitle 584605 audacity: segfault with multiple ALSA devices
Bug #584605 [audacity] audacity: Segfaults with complaint about jack server not
running
Changed Bug title to
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 07:45:45PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 06:58:44PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 06:37:25PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
+Build-Depends: libtool,
+ automake1.11,
+ autoconf,
+ debhelper (>= 7.0.1),
+ quilt,
+ patchutils (
Accepted:
zyn_1+git.20100609-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/z/zyn/zyn_1+git.20100609-1.debian.tar.gz
zyn_1+git.20100609-1.dsc
to main/z/zyn/zyn_1+git.20100609-1.dsc
zyn_1+git.20100609.orig.tar.gz
to main/z/zyn/zyn_1+git.20100609.orig.tar.gz
zynadd_1+git.20100609-1_amd64.deb
to main/z/zyn/zynadd
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 06:58:44PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 06:37:25PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
+Build-Depends: libtool,
+ automake1.11,
+ autoconf,
+ debhelper (>= 7.0.1),
+ quilt,
+ patchutils (>= 0.2.25),
+ cdbs (>= 0.4.27),
+ cdbs (>= 0.4.70~),
+ d-shli
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 06:37:25PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> +Build-Depends: libtool,
>>> + automake1.11,
>>> + autoconf,
>>> + debhelper (>= 7.0.1),
>>> + quilt,
>>> + patchutils (>= 0.2.25),
>>> + cdbs (>= 0.4.27),
>>> + cdbs (>= 0.4.70~),
>>> + d-shlibs,
>>> + debhelper (>= 7.0.0),
FYI: The status of the ffmpeg source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 4:0.5.1-3
Current version: 4:0.5.2-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rece
FYI: The status of the ardour source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:2.8.6-1
Current version: 1:2.8.9-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rece
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 06:14:07PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:50:18PM +,
adiknoth-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
-Build-Depends: libtool, automake1.11, autoconf, cdbs (>= 0.4.53), debhelper
(>= 7.0.1), quilt, patchutils,
- d-shlibs (>= 30),
+Build-De
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: 14 June 2010 07:17
Subject: New addition to copyrights file
To: ha...@linux.com
Please add:
Alexej Penkov (aleksej.pen...@gmail.com) [additional LiVES coding]
Cheers,
Gabriel.
--
Harry Rickards - ha...@linux.com
Vote Lib Dem - Build
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:50:18PM +,
adiknoth-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
> -Build-Depends: libtool, automake1.11, autoconf, cdbs (>= 0.4.53), debhelper
> (>= 7.0.1), quilt, patchutils,
> - d-shlibs (>= 30),
> +Build-Depends: libtool,
> + automake1.11,
> + autoconf,
> + debhelp
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:50:18PM +,
adiknoth-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
> -jack-audio-connection-kit (1:0.118+svn3796-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> +jack-audio-connection-kit (1:0.118+svn3796-1) unstable; urgency=low
Is it right to start with 1:something-1? Because we already had
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:58:42AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> >> +libjack 0 (>= 0.116.0) | libjack-0.116
> >
> > Is this correct? RT would like to start the transition within the next
> > hour, so we should at least get the shlibs file right. ;)
>
> It should be:
>
> libja
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:27, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:25:08PM +,
> adiknoth-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
>
>> Enable different jackd implementations.
>>
>> We don't provide symbols anymore, we go for shlibs now.
>>
>> diff --git a/debian/libjack0.shli
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:25:08PM +,
adiknoth-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
> Enable different jackd implementations.
>
> We don't provide symbols anymore, we go for shlibs now.
>
> diff --git a/debian/libjack0.shlibs b/debian/libjack0.shlibs
> new file mode 100644
> ind
Si vous ne pouvez pas lire cet email, suivre ce lien
(http://front.chemises-web.eu/php/emailing/view_mail.php?CODE=60GFB3RU_308771&HASH=e1e115ab578d85f16d16f4b9d424eb8b)
Chemiseweb.com : Arrivage nouveau modèle New Wave à 45
FABRICANT DE CHEMISES MODE HAUT DE GAMME, VENTE DIREC
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Adrian Knoth
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I wonder if we're ready to start (or at least prepare) the jackd
> transition today. We've discussed a lot, so am I right to summarize
> the current plan as follows?:
>
> 1.) put jackd1 back in j-a-c-k, IOW, introduce an epoch versio
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:24:14PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
I wonder if we're ready to start (or at least prepare) the jackd
transition today.
[snip]
If nobody objects, I'll rearrange the git repo today, putting current
stuff in separate jackd2 branches and revive jackd1. We could then
sta
Hi!
I wonder if we're ready to start (or at least prepare) the jackd
transition today. We've discussed a lot, so am I right to summarize
the current plan as follows?:
1.) put jackd1 back in j-a-c-k, IOW, introduce an epoch version number
2.) provide a new jackd2 source package
This obviously
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:51:44AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > From a quick look, the only potential issue with the j-a-c-k upload
> > itself I can see is that it build-depends on python; however, as it
> > doesn't produce any python modules and only appears to have a runtime
> > dependency
On Mon, June 14, 2010 06:49, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 16:57:52 (CEST), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 18:39 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>> This creates the situation that we actually partially revert the last
>>> transition. However, we still conside
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:14:22 (CEST), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, June 14, 2010 06:49, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 16:57:52 (CEST), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 18:39 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
This creates the situation that we actual
Am 14.06.2010 10:44, schrieb Thibaut VARÈNE:
for the same reason my package didn't FTBFS *in Debian*: rules define
--prefix, which masks the bug. The bug is hit when there's no defined
prefix and the configure script has to guess it. I thought this was
clear enough from my initial bug report: "wh
Le 14 juin 10 à 10:10, Fabian Greffrath a écrit :
Am 27.04.2010 19:25, schrieb Thibaut VARÈNE:
It does, provided of course that the target package's configure
script
is properly re-generated against the fixed libFLAC.m4
Ugh, don't want!
This means that any package that was autoconf'd agai
Am 27.04.2010 19:25, schrieb Thibaut VARÈNE:
It does, provided of course that the target package's configure script
is properly re-generated against the fixed libFLAC.m4
Ugh, don't want!
This means that any package that was autoconf'd against the broken m4
file will fail to build when its con
32 matches
Mail list logo
