On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 05:34:21 (CEST), ceros-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> commit 1cae336aff15c11be3e10e6cd25c41541aeea49c
> Author: Andres Mejia
> Date: Sun Apr 25 23:01:59 2010 -0400
>
> Bump version of faac.
are yo
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:38:17 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 14:27, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 19:47:47 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>
>>> I notice, though, that above links only mention API, not ABI. Is it
>>> safe to expect library ABI (r
Hi,
Our JACK packaging has now contains jackd2 (no longer jackd1).
Upstream has promised a frozen library API[1] equal to that of jackd1
0.116.2, and both shlibs file and symbols[2] file reflect that.
The library packages no longer provide packwards compatibility with
libjack0.100.0-dev. Th
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 14:27, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 19:47:47 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> I notice, though, that above links only mention API, not ABI. Is it
>> safe to expect library ABI (runtime linkage) to be frozen too if its API
>> (compile time interface
Your message dated Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:02:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#578509: fixed in audacity 1.3.12-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #578509,
regarding conflicting file when upgrading from 1.3.11-2 to 1.3.12-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Accepted:
audacity-data_1.3.12-3_all.deb
to main/a/audacity/audacity-data_1.3.12-3_all.deb
audacity-dbg_1.3.12-3_amd64.deb
to main/a/audacity/audacity-dbg_1.3.12-3_amd64.deb
audacity_1.3.12-3.debian.tar.bz2
to main/a/audacity/audacity_1.3.12-3.debian.tar.bz2
audacity_1.3.12-3.dsc
to main
Do you need 100% Finance? Do you need financial advancement this year ? But
with Global Financial Agency , you can get the cheapest and affordable loan
at a low percentage rate of 2.5% yearly. I have been arranging loans for many
years and We are licensed and recognized internationally with a gl
audacity_1.3.12-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
audacity_1.3.12-3.dsc
audacity_1.3.12-3.debian.tar.bz2
audacity-data_1.3.12-3_all.deb
audacity_1.3.12-3_amd64.deb
audacity-dbg_1.3.12-3_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running
Your message dated Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:17:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#579134: fixed in jack-audio-connection-kit 1.9.5~dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #579134,
regarding jack-audio-connection-kit: broken shlibs file: calls dh_makeshlibs
with '-V'
to be marked as done.
T
Accepted:
jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
to
main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-2.dsc
to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-2.dsc
jackd-firewire_1.
jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-2.dsc
jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
jackd_1.9.5~dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libjack0_1.9.5~dfsg-2_amd64.deb
jackd-firewire_1.9.5~
2010/4/22 Adrian Knoth :
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:40:54AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> wrote:
[big snip]
>> The best solution for a dynamically linked program would be to simply
>> upgrade the drumstick library. But as Debian is distributing a
>> statically compiled KMidimon,
Hi,
Who will join the Mini DebConf in Berlin?
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing l
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 19:47:47 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I notice, though, that above links only mention API, not ABI. Is it
> safe to expect library ABI (runtime linkage) to be frozen too if its API
> (compile time interface) is?
Generally speaking, yes.
(well, unless there are toolc
Hi IOhannes, Paul, and interested folk on the debian multimedia
packaging team,
Are you interested in seeing lively discussion at debconf about
multimedia and arts and debian? Some of you have already submitted
events or talks, and we wanted to know if any of you would be interested
in coordinati
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 09:20:46AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 23:01:48 (CEST), Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> >> I do intend to use experimental if necessary to not disrupt theflow of
> >> more important packages (read: default JACK implementation) from
> >> unstab
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 03:36:02PM -0500, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
Hi Jonas,
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
[3] Going backwards has never been promised, though. A
program compiled against 0.118.0 will work with 0.34.0.
However, the use of weak symbols for new features
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 07:10:52PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Let's recommend dh7 and make it mandatory for new packages. We should
let the uploader decide, when it's the right time to switch from CDBS
to dh7.
Why, if I may ask?
dh7 is not a successor for CDBS.
Kind regards,
- Jonas
-
Am Sonntag, den 25.04.2010, 19:00 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:44:19PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> >Let's discuss a packaging policy for our team. My favorite would be dh7
> >and dpkg-source 3.0 format. We shouldn't enforce the switch to
> >dpkg-source 3.0 right
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:44:19PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Let's discuss a packaging policy for our team. My favorite would be dh7
and dpkg-source 3.0 format. We shouldn't enforce the switch to
dpkg-source 3.0 right now. Instead we should switch once the uploader
thinks that the tools are
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> My favorite would be dh7 and dpkg-source 3.0 format.
It's also my favorite one.
> We shouldn't enforce the switch to dpkg-source 3.0 right now.
> Instead we should switch once the uploader thinks that the
> tools are ready for 3.0.
I tota
Am Sonntag, den 25.04.2010, 09:27 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 23:05:29 (CEST), Harry Rickards wrote:
>
> > There is a lintian warning with lives - missing-debian-source-format.
> > This is fixed by adding a debian/source/format. Should I put '1.0' in
> > the file or p
FYI: The status of the csound source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:5.11.1~dfsg-4
Current version: 1:5.12.1~dfsg-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day y
severity 57913 serious
thanks
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 05:16:22PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
This generates way too strict dependencies on the libjack library.
After internal discussions and discussing the matter with upstream, the
jack ABI has been frozen after the 0.116.2 release. The shli
Package: jack-audio-connection-kit
Version: 1.9.5+svn3977-1
Severity: important
This generates way too strict dependencies on the libjack library. After
internal discussions and discussing the matter with upstream, the jack
ABI has been frozen after the 0.116.2 release. The shlibs file should
ther
Accepted:
jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
to
main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-1.dsc
to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-1.dsc
jack-audio-connec
jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-1.dsc
jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg.orig.tar.gz
jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
jackd_1.9.5~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
libj
Package: audacity
Severity: normal
Bug reproducible only with cupt (I use 1.5.9).
Anyway bug not reproducible with:
* aptitude
* apt-get
* dpkg -i
please consider change Severity to normal
best regards
Alessandro De zorzi
___
pkg-multi
Package: audacity
Severity: normal
I am not be able to reproduce the error on my amd64 system. I get 1.3.11-2 from
snapshot [1]. I test the upgrade with apt-get and aptitude too.
apt-get install audacity audacity-data
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state i
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 09:17:02AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > Calling all potential contributors to DebConf10! One more week until
> > the final submission deadline!
>
> Okay, so do we want to give a talk or a presentation on what we work on
> at debconf10? AFAIUI, there is a number of me
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 11:14:50 (CEST), Harry Rickards wrote:
> I'll just put format 1.0 for the moment then, if that's agreeable with
> everyone.
Yes, until we decide to convert all packages to format 3.0, I think
that's a safe bet, at least for now.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, Ke
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Harry Rickards wrote:
> I'll just put format 1.0 for the moment then, if that's agreeable with
> everyone.
>
It's fine for me.
--
Alessio Treglia
Ubuntu MOTU Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0
On 25 April 2010 08:27, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 23:05:29 (CEST), Harry Rickards wrote:
>
>> There is a lintian warning with lives - missing-debian-source-format.
>> This is fixed by adding a debian/source/format. Should I put '1.0' in
>> the file or put '3.0 (quilt)' and
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 23:05:29 (CEST), Harry Rickards wrote:
> There is a lintian warning with lives - missing-debian-source-format.
> This is fixed by adding a debian/source/format. Should I put '1.0' in
> the file or put '3.0 (quilt)' and switch to 3.0. Does this just
> involve removing the '-
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 23:01:48 (CEST), Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
>> I do intend to use experimental if necessary to not disrupt theflow of
>> more important packages (read: default JACK implementation) from
>> unstable to testing.
>
> Until the naming issues are settled and packages hit e
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 01:42:06 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Calling all potential contributors to DebConf10! One more week until
> the final submission deadline!
Okay, so do we want to give a talk or a presentation on what we work on
at debconf10? AFAIUI, there is a number of members
36 matches
Mail list logo
