bristol_0.40.8-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: bristol-data_0.40.8-2_all.deb to main/b/bristol/bristol-data_0.40.8-2_all.deb bristol_0.40.8-2.diff.gz to main/b/bristol/bristol_0.40.8-2.diff.gz bristol_0.40.8-2.dsc to main/b/bristol/bristol_0.40.8-2.dsc bristol_0.40.8-2_amd64.deb to main/b/bristol/bristol_0.40.8-2_amd64.deb

Processing of bristol_0.40.8-2_amd64.changes

bristol_0.40.8-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: bristol_0.40.8-2.dsc bristol_0.40.8-2.diff.gz bristol_0.40.8-2_amd64.deb bristol-data_0.40.8-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) ___

Re: Possible problems in your Debian packages

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 22:16:28 (CEST), DDPOMail robot wrote: > This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month. > For more information about these mails, refer to > http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail > > === bristol: > = Missing build(s) on kfreebsd-amd64 kfree

RE:hi 9

hi9 Dear friends, I'm sorry, wasted your valuable time, we are chinese a major international trading electronics wholesale company. Our company's electronic products have the best quality, cheapest price and best service. If you have time to buy 5 products that can free you of the pos

Bug#568272: mplayer: Overwrites configuration file it generated itself

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 19:23:52 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Can you please send me the md5sum of the conffile that was generated >> for you in the default install? I'll add it then to our maintainer >> scripts to avoid this conffile prompt. > > I recommend to calculate the md5sum yourself,

Re: packaging jack...

Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: > > > On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >>> stop right here. >>> the library and the daemon are tied together. >>> the protocol between jackd and libjack is NOT fixed. >>> >>> (basically i consider it a mistake to even have libjack and jackd in >>> dif

Possible problems in your Debian packages

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === bristol: = Missing build(s) on kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 This might need manual action from your side. See https://buil

Bug#578278: aeolus - FTBFS: error: unrecognized command line option "-march=native"

Source: aeolus Version: 0.8.4-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.60.0 (23 Feb 2010) on lxdebian.bfinv.de [...] > make[2]: Entering directory > `/build/buildd-aeolus_0.8.4-2-s390-o0VTgy/aeolus-0.8.4/source' > g++ -g -O2 -O3 -

ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206-18+lenny1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Warnings: Could not copy ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206.orig.tar.gz to holding; will attempt to find in DB later ignoring ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206.orig.tar.gz, since it's already in the archive. Notes: Mapping stable-security to proposed-updates. Accepted: ffmpeg-dbg_0.svn20080206-18+lenny1_

Re: lash_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Hello Jonas, thank you for your amazing work. best regards mira ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

lash_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: lash-bin_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.deb to main/l/lash/lash-bin_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.deb lash-doc_0.5.4.0-1_all.deb to main/l/lash/lash-doc_0.5.4.0-1_all.deb lash_0.5.4.0-1.debian.tar.gz to main/l/lash/lash_0.5.4.0-1.debian.tar.gz lash_0.5.4.0-1.dsc to main/l/lash/lash_0.5.4.0-1.dsc lash_0.5.4

Processing of lash_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.changes

lash_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lash_0.5.4.0-1.dsc lash_0.5.4.0.orig.tar.gz lash_0.5.4.0-1.debian.tar.gz lash-doc_0.5.4.0-1_all.deb liblash-dev_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.deb lashd_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.deb lash-bin_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.deb liblash2_0

Bug#553630: marked as done ([aeolus] FTBFS with binutils-gold)

Your message dated Sun, 18 Apr 2010 10:47:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#553630: fixed in aeolus 0.8.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #553630, regarding [aeolus] FTBFS with binutils-gold to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: aeolus_0.8.4-2.diff.gz to main/a/aeolus/aeolus_0.8.4-2.diff.gz aeolus_0.8.4-2.dsc to main/a/aeolus/aeolus_0.8.4-2.dsc aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb to main/a/aeolus/aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: aeolus_0.8.4-2.dsc - source sound aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb

Processing of aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.changes

aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: aeolus_0.8.4-2.dsc aeolus_0.8.4-2.diff.gz aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) ___ pkg-multime

Re: packaging jack...

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 22:07:56 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 09:48:41PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >>On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 21:01:21 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 03:25:45PM +0200, torbenh wrote: >>> we (upstream) will make su

Re: packaging jack...

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 22:02:14 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I think others have tried pointing it out to me already, and it begins > to get through my thick skull: Even if both ABI and API is compatible > across implementations, it is _application_ ABI and API - the daemon use > a _differen

Re: packaging jack...

Puh, here goes another lengthy mail... On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 20:31:46 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 09:25, torbenh wrote: >> adi said that you somehow seem to believe that >> there cant be virtual packages containing libraries. >> >> this is not true. >> >> if you cre