Le lundi 09 novembre 2020 à 21:08 +, Sudip Mukherjee a écrit :
> I have attached the list.
> Do you want me to add them in my MBF list and raise bug reports for
> them?
If I remember well, I'm the main culprit behind those, and I'll refresh
them -- probably at the end of the week:
node-ast-ty
Hi Utkarsh and Xavier,
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 5:08 AM Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
>
> Hi Sudip,
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Sudip Mukherjee
> wrote:
> > While going through packages to find autopkgtests which are
> > superficial I noticed that some of of the javascript packages are
> > doing jus
Hi,
Yes, do it, thanks!
Cheers,
Xavier
Le 9 novembre 2020 22:08:46 GMT+01:00, Sudip Mukherjee
a écrit :
>Hi Utkarsh and Xavier,
>
>On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 5:08 AM Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sudip,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Sudip Mukherjee
>> wrote:
>> > While going through pack
Hi Sudip,
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Sudip Mukherjee
wrote:
> While going through packages to find autopkgtests which are
> superficial I noticed that some of of the javascript packages are
> doing just:
> nodejs -e "require('foo.js');"
>
> After reading the documentation at [1], it seems tha
Le 08/11/2020 à 23:50, Sudip Mukherjee a écrit :
> Dear Javascript Maintainers,
>
> While going through packages to find autopkgtests which are
> superficial I noticed that some of of the javascript packages are
> doing just:
> nodejs -e "require('foo.js');"
>
> After reading the documentation at
Dear Javascript Maintainers,
While going through packages to find autopkgtests which are
superficial I noticed that some of of the javascript packages are
doing just:
nodejs -e "require('foo.js');"
After reading the documentation at [1], it seems that it will just
load the object in cache so that
