Le 22/10/2018 à 12:52, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:34 PM Xavier wrote:
>>
>> Le 22/10/2018 à 11:23, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
>>> I really need it for next ckeditor (40 small packages) and acorn.
>>>
>>> For uscan I do not think the alpha sort is worthwhile. Let ver
Le 22/10/2018 à 11:23, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> I really need it for next ckeditor (40 small packages) and acorn.
>
> For uscan I do not think the alpha sort is worthwhile. Let version be
> in watch file order.
Do you speak on fakeuptream-like behavior ? If yes, I think a
1.0.0+~23.4.65 ver
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:34 PM Xavier wrote:
>
> Le 22/10/2018 à 11:23, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> > I really need it for next ckeditor (40 small packages) and acorn.
> >
> > For uscan I do not think the alpha sort is worthwhile. Let version be
> > in watch file order.
>
> Do you speak on fa
I really need it for next ckeditor (40 small packages) and acorn.
For uscan I do not think the alpha sort is worthwhile. Let version be
in watch file order.
Bastien
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 5:18 PM Xavier wrote:
>
> Le 20/10/2018 à 16:47, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at
Le 20/10/2018 à 16:47, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 3:29 PM Bastien ROUCARIES
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:03 AM Xavier wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 13/09/2018 à 11:16, Xavier a écrit :
Le 11/09/2018 à 19:48, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>
> On 9/11/18 10:45 PM
Le 20/10/2018 à 16:47, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 3:29 PM Bastien ROUCARIES
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:03 AM Xavier wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 13/09/2018 à 11:16, Xavier a écrit :
Le 11/09/2018 à 19:48, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>
> On 9/11/18 10:45 PM
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 3:29 PM Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:03 AM Xavier wrote:
> >
> > Le 13/09/2018 à 11:16, Xavier a écrit :
> > > Le 11/09/2018 à 19:48, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> > >>
> > >> On 9/11/18 10:45 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > >>> Hi Xavier,
> > >>>
> > >>>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:03 AM Xavier wrote:
>
> Le 13/09/2018 à 11:16, Xavier a écrit :
> > Le 11/09/2018 à 19:48, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> >>
> >> On 9/11/18 10:45 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> >>> Hi Xavier,
> >>>
> >>> The example in Provides section should be written
> >>> Provides: node-ta, no
Le 13/09/2018 à 11:16, Xavier a écrit :
> Le 11/09/2018 à 19:48, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>>
>> On 9/11/18 10:45 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>> Hi Xavier,
>>>
>>> The example in Provides section should be written
>>> Provides: node-ta, node-tb
>>> ?
>>
>> I think there should not be Provides as it impli
Le 11/09/2018 à 19:48, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>
> On 9/11/18 10:45 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> Hi Xavier,
>>
>> The example in Provides section should be written
>> Provides: node-ta, node-tb
>> ?
>
> I think there should not be Provides as it implies sharing, which will
> negate the reason why we
Le 12/09/2018 à 11:48, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 7:16 PM Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>
>> Hi Xavier,
>>
>> The example in Provides section should be written
>> Provides: node-ta, node-tb
>> ?
>
> Provides MUST be versionned in order to get smooth upgrade if we split.
Updated,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 7:16 PM Jérémy Lal wrote:
>
> Hi Xavier,
>
> The example in Provides section should be written
> Provides: node-ta, node-tb
> ?
Provides MUST be versionned in order to get smooth upgrade if we split.
Bastien
>
>
> 2018-09-10 23:34 GMT+02:00 Xavier :
>>
>> Dear fellow main
Le 11/09/2018 à 21:06, Xavier a écrit :
> Le 11/09/2018 à 21:01, Xavier a écrit :
>> Le 11/09/2018 à 19:48, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>>>
>>> On 9/11/18 10:45 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Hi Xavier,
The example in Provides section should be written
Provides: node-ta, node-tb
?
>>>
Le 11/09/2018 à 21:01, Xavier a écrit :
> Le 11/09/2018 à 19:48, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>>
>> On 9/11/18 10:45 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>> Hi Xavier,
>>>
>>> The example in Provides section should be written
>>> Provides: node-ta, node-tb
>>> ?
>>
>> I think there should not be Provides as it impli
Le 11/09/2018 à 19:48, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>
> On 9/11/18 10:45 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> Hi Xavier,
>>
>> The example in Provides section should be written
>> Provides: node-ta, node-tb
>> ?
>
> I think there should not be Provides as it implies sharing, which will
> negate the reason why we
Le 11/09/2018 à 19:15, Jérémy Lal a écrit :
> Hi Xavier,
>
> The example in Provides section should be written
> Provides: node-ta, node-tb
> ?
Hi Jérémy,
updated, thanks !
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin
On 9/11/18 10:45 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Hi Xavier,
>
> The example in Provides section should be written
> Provides: node-ta, node-tb
> ?
I think there should not be Provides as it implies sharing, which will
negate the reason why we are embedding in the first place.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel m
Hi Xavier,
The example in Provides section should be written
Provides: node-ta, node-tb
?
2018-09-10 23:34 GMT+02:00 Xavier :
> Dear fellow maintainers,
>
> QA team accepted my changes, so now fakeupstream.cgi is able to handle
> npmjs multiple sources. I've written a draft here:
> https://wiki
On 09/10/2018 11:34 PM, Xavier wrote:
> Dear fellow maintainers,
>
> QA team accepted my changes, so now fakeupstream.cgi is able to handle
> npmjs multiple sources. I've written a draft here:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/GroupSourcesTutorial
>
> Please review it.
>
> Many thanks!
> Xavier
Dear fellow maintainers,
QA team accepted my changes, so now fakeupstream.cgi is able to handle
npmjs multiple sources. I've written a draft here:
https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/GroupSourcesTutorial
Please review it.
Many thanks!
Xavier
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-d
20 matches
Mail list logo