Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Contacting JavaScript team

2024-09-26 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Thu, 26 Sept 2024 at 13:01, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Am Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 10:21:47PM +0100 schrieb Sudip Mukherjee: > > On Mon, 23 Sept 2024 at 14:10, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > as your Debian Project Leader I'd li

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Contacting JavaScript team

2024-09-25 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Mon, 23 Sept 2024 at 14:10, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi, > > as your Debian Project Leader I'd like to officially contact all our > teams to learn about potential issues that might affect your work. I > would love to learn how you organise / share your workload. If you do > some regular meeti

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974387: node-import-lazy: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-import-lazy X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-import-lazy is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('import-

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974293: node-output-file-sync: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-output-file-sync X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-output-file-sync is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "requir

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974393: node-orchestrator: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-orchestrator X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-orchestrator is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('orche

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974392: node-is-plain-obj: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-is-plain-obj X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-is-plain-obj is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('is-pl

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974303: node-repeating: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-repeating X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-repeating is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('repeating')

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974411: node-request-capture-har: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-request-capture-har X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-request-capture-har is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974413: node-json-parse-helpfulerror: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-json-parse-helpfulerror X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-json-parse-helpfulerror is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - no

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974388: node-imurmurhash: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-imurmurhash X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-imurmurhash is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('imurmur

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974412: node-has-symbol-support-x: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-has-symbol-support-x X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-has-symbol-support-x is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974389: node-resolve-cwd: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-resolve-cwd X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-resolve-cwd is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('resolve

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974304: node-seedrandom: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-seedrandom X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-seedrandom is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('seedrando

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974415: node-generator-supported: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-generator-supported X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-generator-supported is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974417: node-remove-trailing-separator: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-remove-trailing-separator X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-remove-trailing-separator is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974416: node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - no

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974399: node-os-browserify: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-os-browserify X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-os-browserify is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('os-

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974394: node-registry-url: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-registry-url X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-registry-url is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('regis

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974404: node-normalize-range: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-normalize-range X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-normalize-range is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require(

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974403: node-shebang-command: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-shebang-command X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-shebang-command is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require(

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974406: node-path-browserify: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-path-browserify X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-path-browserify is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require(

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974400: node-to-object-path: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-to-object-path X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-to-object-path is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('t

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974402: node-performance-now: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-performance-now X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-performance-now is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require(

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974274: node-mississippi: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-mississippi X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-mississippi is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('mississ

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974410: node-is-data-descriptor: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-is-data-descriptor X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-is-data-descriptor is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "re

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974414: node-posix-character-classes: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-posix-character-classes X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-posix-character-classes is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - no

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974405: node-get-caller-file: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-get-caller-file X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-get-caller-file is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require(

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974398: node-package-json: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-package-json X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-package-json is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('packa

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974409: node-parallel-transform: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-parallel-transform X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-parallel-transform is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "re

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974401: node-json-localizer: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-json-localizer X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-json-localizer is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('j

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974396: node-resolve-from: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-resolve-from X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-resolve-from is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('resol

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974407: node-promise-inflight: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-promise-inflight X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-promise-inflight is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "requir

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974408: node-gulp-load-plugins: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-gulp-load-plugins X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-gulp-load-plugins is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "requ

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974397: node-gulp-plumber: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-gulp-plumber X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-gulp-plumber is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('gulp-

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974395: node-generic-pool: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-generic-pool X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-generic-pool is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('gener

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974391: node-random-bytes: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-random-bytes X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-random-bytes is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('rando

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974372: node-getobject: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-getobject X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-getobject is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('getobject')

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974368: node-quick-lru: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-quick-lru X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-quick-lru is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('quick-lru')

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974381: node-time-stamp: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-time-stamp X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-time-stamp is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('time-stam

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974375: node-term-size: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-term-size X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-term-size is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('term-size')

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974385: node-has-unicode: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-has-unicode X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-has-unicode is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('has-uni

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974262: node-lodash-compat: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-lodash-compat X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-lodash-compat is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('lod

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974369: node-strip-bom: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-strip-bom X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-strip-bom is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('strip-bom')

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974374: node-time-zone: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-time-zone X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-time-zone is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('time-zone')

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974377: node-text-table: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-text-table X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-text-table is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('text-tabl

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974289: node-querystringify: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-querystringify X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-querystringify is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('q

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974383: node-sequencify: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-sequencify X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-sequencify is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('sequencif

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974371: node-strip-eof: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-strip-eof X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-strip-eof is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('strip-eof')

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974390: node-jszip-utils: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-jszip-utils X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-jszip-utils is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - #nodejs -e "require('jszip-

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974373: node-mousetrap: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-mousetrap X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-mousetrap is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('mousetrap')

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974384: node-has-gulplog: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-has-gulplog X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-has-gulplog is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('has-gul

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974292: node-preserve: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-preserve X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-preserve is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('preserve');"

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974370: node-fd-slicer: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-fd-slicer X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-fd-slicer is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('fd-slicer')

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974382: node-reinterval: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-reinterval X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-reinterval is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('reinterva

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974379: node-slice-ansi: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-slice-ansi X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-slice-ansi is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('slice-ans

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974386: node-type-detect: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-type-detect X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-type-detect is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('type-de

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974376: node-proxy-addr: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-proxy-addr X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-proxy-addr is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('proxy-add

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974378: node-jsonselect: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-jsonselect X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-jsonselect is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('JSONSelec

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974366: node-starttls: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-starttls X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-starttls is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('starttls');"

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974365: node-sparkles: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-sparkles X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-sparkles is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('sparkles');"

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974359: node-schlock: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-schlock X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-schlock is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('schlock');" Ex

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974362: node-jsonify: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-jsonify X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-jsonify is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('jsonify');" Ex

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974358: node-pkg-up: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-pkg-up X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-pkg-up is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('pkg-up');" Execu

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974367: node-sort-keys: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-sort-keys X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-sort-keys is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('sort-keys')

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974352: node-jsbn: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-jsbn X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-jsbn is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('jsbn');" Executing t

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974364: node-inflight: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-inflight X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-inflight is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('inflight');"

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974354: node-slide: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-slide X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-slide is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('slide');" Executin

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974349: node-lie: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-lie X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-lie is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('lie');" Executing that

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974351: node-pify: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-pify X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-pify is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('pify');" Executing t

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974361: node-shelljs: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-shelljs X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-shelljs is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('shelljs');" Ex

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974353: node-split: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-split X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-split is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('split');" Executin

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974356: node-samsam: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-samsam X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-samsam is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('samsam');" Execu

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974355: node-gauge: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-gauge X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-gauge is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('gauge');" Executin

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974350: node-mess: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-mess X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-mess is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('mess');" Executing t

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974363: node-reserved: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-reserved X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-reserved is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('reserved');"

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974348: node-rx: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-rx X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-rx is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('rx');" Executing that co

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974357: node-is-npm: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-is-npm X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-is-npm is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('is-npm');" Execu

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974360: node-through: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-through X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-through is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('through');" Ex

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974261: node-lazy-debug-legacy: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-lazy-debug-legacy X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-lazy-debug-legacy is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "requ

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974308: node-requires-port: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-requires-port X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-requires-port is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('req

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974263: node-hook-std: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-hook-std X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-hook-std is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('hook-std');"

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974268: node-map-obj: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-map-obj X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-map-obj is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('map-obj');" Ex

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974279: node-lodash-reescape: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-lodash-reescape X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-lodash-reescape is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require(

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974307: node-require-directory: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-require-directory X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-require-directory is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "requ

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974290: node-npm-run-path: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-npm-run-path X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-npm-run-path is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('npm-r

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974311: node-sntp: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-sntp X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-sntp is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('@hapi/sntp');" Execu

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974267: node-mdn-data: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-mdn-data X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-mdn-data is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('mdn-data');"

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974281: node-po2json: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-po2json X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-po2json is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('po2json');" Ex

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974273: node-jquery-mousewheel: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-jquery-mousewheel X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-jquery-mousewheel is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "requ

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974312: node-snapdragon-util: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-snapdragon-util X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-snapdragon-util is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require(

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974280: node-nomnom: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-nomnom X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-nomnom is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('nomnom');" Execu

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974291: node-read-file: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-read-file X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-read-file is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('read-file')

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974337: node-webpack-stats-plugin: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-webpack-stats-plugin X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-webpack-stats-plugin is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974336: node-webfinger: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-webfinger X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-webfinger is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('webfinger')

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974341: node-vali-date: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-vali-date X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-vali-date is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('vali-date')

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974343: node-yamlish: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-yamlish X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-yamlish is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('yamlish');" Ex

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974335: node-verror: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-verror X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-verror is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('verror');" Execu

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974338: node-xmlhttprequest-ssl: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-xmlhttprequest-ssl X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-xmlhttprequest-ssl is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "re

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974334: node-wcwidth.js: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-wcwidth.js X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-wcwidth.js is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('wcwidth.j

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974340: node-which-module: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Source: node-which-module X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org Severity: important Usertags: superficialtest Dear Maintainer, It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in node-which-module is running a trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage: - nodejs -e "require('which

  1   2   >