Hi Santiago,
Thanks a lot for attempting rescuing node-wikibase-cli.
On 2025-05-23 20:14, Santiago Vila wrote:
I naively tried to disable the remaining five tests still
using the network by applying the attached patch (in quilt format),
but then I get 50 failures instead of five. 😱
I'm attachi
Hi Santiago,
On 2024-10-20 04:50, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
Following a discussion we had in #debian-security with dnl, and by the comment
by Mortiz in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1084059#5,
I think it is worth to discuss if packages {,build} depending on
the EOL'ed twit
Source: node-stable
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Back in a day I packaged/sponsored a bunch of node packages needed by
node-shiny-server. I ended up never using shiny-server and/or
node-shiny-server, but with the responsibility for its dependencies.
Thus I would like to be removed from the uploa
Source: node-pause
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Back in a day I packaged/sponsored a bunch of node packages needed by
node-shiny-server. I ended up never using shiny-server and/or
node-shiny-server, but with the responsibility for its dependencies.
Thus I would like to be removed from the upload
Source: node-morgan
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Back in a day I packaged/sponsored a bunch of node packages needed by
node-shiny-server. I ended up never using shiny-server and/or
node-shiny-server, but with the responsibility for its dependencies.
Thus I would like to be removed from the uploa
Source: node-client-sessions
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Back in a day I packaged/sponsored a bunch of node packages needed by
node-shiny-server. I ended up never using shiny-server and/or
node-shiny-server, but with the responsibility for its dependencies.
Thus I would like to be removed from
Source: node-ip-address
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Back in a day I packaged/sponsored a bunch of node packages needed by
node-shiny-server. I ended up never using shiny-server and/or
node-shiny-server, but with the responsibility for its dependencies.
Thus I would like to be removed from the u
Hello,
I have commented out a pair of test cases which attempted network access
in the upload of node-wikibase-cli 15.15.4-5. Could you please check
whether FTBFS continues?
On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 12:16:39 +0100 Sven Mueller wrote:
Interestingly, in our build environment which has some extreme
Hi,
On 2023-10-23 22:04, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
Source: node-katex
Source package names in Subject and Source do not match. Please retitle
if this is not intentional.
Best,
Andrius
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.deb
Hi all,
Back in a day I packaged/sponsored a bunch of node packages needed by
node-shiny-server. I ended up never using shiny-server and/or
node-shiny-server, but with the responsibility for its dependencies. I
would be happy if someone from Med or JS teams could step up and replace
me as the
Source: node-eventemitter3
Severity: wishlist
Version: 4.0.7-3
Hello,
node-eventemitter3 contains a debian/todo file with the following content:
Tests depend on node-assume, which is not yet packaged (#962635):
mocha spec --timeout 1 test/test.js
node-assume is now packaged and it see
Source: node-agent-base
Severity: normal
Hello,
The upstream of node-agent-base has merged several repositories into
one, thus debian/watch should be updated to see more recent versions of
this package. Upstream message could be found here [1].
[1]
https://github.com/TooTallNate/node-agent-
Hi,
On 2023-03-23 17:05, Yadd wrote:
should.js already provides its typescript definitions, @types/should is
an empty package. Maybe the issue is just to rename "typings" field into
"types"
Thanks for the prompt fix. It may have been my mistake to forget to
include 'should' into debian/nodej
Package: node-should
Version: 13.2.3~dfsg-6
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I am working to update node-wikibase-sdk to 9.0.5 (newest release ATM).
The new release has tests depending on @types/should which does not seem
to be packaged.
Andrius
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-
Hello,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 12:12:09 +0200 Yadd wrote:
node-fetch 3 is ready in experimental. It is an hybrid package:
* ES part is node-fetch-3
* CJS part reproduces node-fetch-2 behavior
This changes are OK for all packages except node-wikibase-cli and
node-wikibase-edit. Sadly I didn't suc
control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Steve,
On Sat, 20 Aug 2022 15:05:03 -0700 Steve Langasek
wrote:
> In Ubuntu, node-wikibase-cli fails to build from source because dh_auto_test
> runs a test suite at build time which requires Internet access, and the
> Ubuntu build environment does not allow access
Hi Yadd,
On 2022-06-24 17:10, Yadd wrote:
> I prepared a fix, pushed to salsa. Could you take a look ?
Thanks a lot, reviewed and uploaded.
Best wishes,
Andrius
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
On 2022-03-30 07:50, Yadd wrote:
> /usr/bin/* links were wrong. I fixed all these issues
Thanks a lot!
Best,
Andrius
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Hi Yadd,
On 2022-03-29 19:17, Yadd wrote:
> On 29/03/2022 17:44, Yadd wrote:
>> Hi Andrius,
>>
>> you fix is enough for commander 8, I'm currently writing commander 9
>> patch
>
> Fixed and pushed. However package looks unusable because all bin/*
> commands are not in $PATH. You could either:
>
Hello,
On 2022-03-24 11:39, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> node-send is patched[1] to use node-mime-types instead of node-mime.
The patch should be dropped altogether, since node-ms is now a package
on its own.
> [1]:
> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-send/-/blob/master/debian/patches/0001-use_ms_
Hi,
On 2022-03-18 16:13, Yadd wrote:
> Maybe this can help:
> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-terser/-/blob/debian/latest/debian/patches/1001_commander.patch
Thanks for pointer. I think I managed to go this far myself by patching:
-const program = require('commander')
+const program = requ
Source: node-wikibase-cli
Version: 15.15.4
Severity: serious
Tags: help
While node-wikibase-cli was in NEW, node-commander was updated from
6.2.1 to 9.0.0. node-wikibase-cli is compatible with node-commander 6.x
only and simple patching does not seem to help. I will try patching it a
bit more, but
On 2022-02-28 08:58, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> If I get a second opinion that
> node-devtools-protocol is not worthy as a package on its own, I will RM it.
Here I meant second opinion besides mine. So if anyone would say
node-devtools-protocol is not worth staying in Debian on its own, I will
Hi Eric,
On 2022-02-27 22:36, Eric Brown wrote:
> Likewise, thank you very much! It’s exciting that the dependencies for
> shiny-server are coming together. Please note the upstream for
> sockjs-client responded to me and released 1.6.0 which also updates some
> other dependency versions.
You are
Hello,
On 2022-02-28 06:09, Martina Ferrari wrote:
>> node-puppeteer embeds a copy of devtools-protocol while Debian has
>> node-devtools-protocol. Please drop this and use node-devtools-protocol
>> dependency
>
> This was done on purpose, as it is not really workable to keep them
> separate due
Hello,
Replying to Nilesh and Andreas in the same mail.
On 2022-02-25 07:49, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 03:09:36AM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>>> Sure. It would be nice to get ACK from Pirate, though, as he owns the ITP.
>> I am a bit confused, why would you need ack from som
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022, 22:21 Andreas Tille, wrote:
> Am Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 06:10:24PM +0200 schrieb Andrius Merkys:
> > >
> https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-client/commit/d9584abe2c7c913ce95a1aea29e5744dd85e1af4
> > > <
> https://github.c
Hi Eric,
On 2022-02-22 14:52, Eric Brown wrote:
> If I’m understanding the below correctly, it appears that the node-json3
> may already have been removed from the dependency socksjs-client, but
> the updated version is not released yet.
>
> https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-client/commit/d9584abe
Hi Eric,
On 2022-02-22 14:52, Eric Brown wrote:
> If I’m understanding the below correctly, it appears that the node-json3
> may already have been removed from the dependency socksjs-client, but
> the updated version is not released yet.
>
> https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-client/commit/d9584abe
On 2022-02-22 13:20, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Unfortunately we have a new problem as
> autopkgtest shows[4]
>
>sockjs-client : Depends: node-json3 (>= 3.3.2) but it is not installable
>
> while we had this package before it was removed[5] from Debian.
>
> I need to admit that I have no idea ho
Hi Nilesh,
On 2022-01-28 09:48, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On 1/28/22 12:55 PM, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> Thanks for the pointer. However, it is not evident to me how this bug
>> could cause false-positive freeze blocks, but maybe there is a whole
>> story behind that. Just min
Hi Nilesh,
On 2022-01-27 17:00, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> It is because of:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004272
Thanks for the pointer. However, it is not evident to me how this bug
could cause false-positive freeze blocks, but maybe there is a whole
story behind that.
Hi,
On 2022-01-27 16:49, Yadd wrote:
> tracker.d.o shows reasons. Fixed for node-pbkdf2
I still see "Not touching package due to block request by elbrus (Follow
the freeze policy when applying for an unblock)" in [1], which seems
misleading to me. We are not in freeze, AFAIK.
[1] https://tracker
Hi,
On 2022-01-27 16:09, Nicolas Mora wrote:
> It seems that the last javascript packages uploaded to unstable can't
> migrate to testing due to a blocking request, for example:
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/node-pbkdf2
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/node-jose
> https://tracker.debian.org/
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for sharing your insight into libjs-modernizr.
On 2022-01-21 11:04, Daniel Ring wrote:
On 1/11/2022 1:43 AM, Andrius Merkys wrote:
You said you were interested in updating libjs-modernizr. I need
libjs-modernizr >= 3.5.0 to package node-puppeteer. Could you prepare an
upd
Hi Yadd,
Thanks a lot for your help!
I see you have updated puppeteer to v13.0.1. Martina and I have
attempted to stick to earlier versions, but if you had luck building
v13.0.1, IMO this is even better.
On 2022-01-14 10:41, Yadd wrote:
> I started to modify your package. The problem for tests i
Hello,
Martina and I have been working on packaging puppeteer, an API to
control Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. Martina got the package
building on sbuild, but we are stuck with tests. Most likely the blocker
is incorrect combination of extcopies/extlinks, but we are not able to
sort it out ou
Hi Daniel,
You said you were interested in updating libjs-modernizr. I need
libjs-modernizr >= 3.5.0 to package node-puppeteer. Could you prepare an
update on a fork/branch in salsa?
Best,
Andrius
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-l
Hi Thorsten,
On 2021-12-10 21:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> please mention "Paul Vorbach and contributors" in your debian/copyright.
Thanks for spotting this! Yadd has fixed the issue, I have uploaded the
fixed version.
Best,
Andrius
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@al
Hi Yadd,
On 2021-11-21 15:18, Yadd wrote:
> I just updated npm2deb, however it is a good practice to launch
> `lintian-brush`. In addition, npm2deb's agorithm is very questionable,
> in particular for the search for reverse dependencies.
Thanks for the recommendation. I was not using lintian-brus
Hi Yadd,
First and foremost, thank you very much for taking care of my packages!
And sorry for the low quality. I will take your notice into consideration.
On 2021-11-21 09:46, Yadd wrote:
> I don't think it's normal to push package with npm2deb default template
> without looking at debian/* file
Hi,
On 2021-10-08 11:43, Yadd wrote:
> Take a look at
> https://github.com/sindresorhus/got/blob/main/documentation/migration-guides/request.md
Thanks for the link. I recall trying to follow these guidelines, but I
dropped the ball on it.
However, the package seems abandoned upstream and is repo
On 2021-03-19 07:55, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 2021, മാർച്ച് 18 8:22:54 PM IST, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> Codesearch does not list any uses of node-sass binary. Thus I think it
>> is safe to remove it.
>
> How? A command line interface can be used directly by users.
&
Hi,
On 2021-03-18 18:55, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On 18 March 2021 8:22:54 pm IST, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>
> On 2021-03-15 13:45, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>> If no one steps in to fix this, then we can consider removing it.
>> Codesearch does not list any uses of node-sass
Hello,
On 2021-03-15 13:45, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 2021, മാർച്ച് 15 4:21:37 PM IST, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>>> $ node-sass
>>> /usr/share/nodejs/normalize-package-data/lib/fixer.js:138
>>> if (!(deps in data)) return
>>> ^
>>
>> Since node-node-sass is supposed to be used as a library, probably
On 2021-03-17 06:50, Yadd wrote:
> Le 16/03/2021 à 12:22, Andrius Merkys a écrit :
>> I am getting lintian warnings:
>>
>> W: node-agent-base: nodejs-module-not-declared node-async-listen
>> usr/share/nodejs/async-listen/package.json
>> W: node-agent-base: node
Hi,
On 2021-03-14 14:49, VIVEK K J wrote:
> I've been modified node-agent-base package for including
> typescript definitions.. The modified repo is available at
> https://salsa.debian.org/vivekkj/node-agent-base .
> Requesting for Sponsorship..
I am getting lintian warnings:
W: node-agent
On 2021-03-15 13:51, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 2021, മാർച്ച് 15 11:55:19 AM IST, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> On 2021-03-14 14:49, VIVEK K J wrote:
>>> I've been modified node-agent-base package for including
>>> typescript definitions.. The modifie
Hi Nilesh,
On 2021-03-15 12:29, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On 15 March 2021 2:13:10 pm IST, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> On 2021-03-15 09:24, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>> We can upload to experimental so work depending on it does not have
>> to wait.
>>
>> Ma
On 2021-03-15 09:24, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 2021, മാർച്ച് 15 11:55:19 AM IST, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> On 2021-03-14 14:49, VIVEK K J wrote:
>>> I've been modified node-agent-base package for including
>>> typescript definitions.. The modifie
Hello,
On 2021-03-14 14:49, VIVEK K J wrote:
> I've been modified node-agent-base package for including
> typescript definitions.. The modified repo is available at
> https://salsa.debian.org/vivekkj/node-agent-base .
> Requesting for Sponsorship..
Could you please open a merge request agai
Hello,
mkdirp-classic can also be removed, as it has been packaged as
node-mkdirp-classic. I assume it is embedded here only because of tar-fs.
Andrius
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-
Source: node-yarnpkg
Version: 1.22.10+~cs22.25.14-2
node-yarnpkg embeds tar-fs, which has been recently packaged as
node-tar-fs. Please consider using the Debian package instead the
embedded source.
Andrius
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https:
On 2021-01-20 15:00, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> Description: collection of autopktest scripts for Perl packages
Sorry, this line should have been:
> Description: collection of autopktest scripts for Nodejs packages
Nevertheless, 'autopktest' spelling remains.
Best,
Andrius
Package: pkg-js-autopkgtest
Version: 0.9.63
There is a couple of outdated/incorrect bits in the description (in
debian/control) of pkg-js-autopkgtest:
> Description: collection of autopktest scripts for Perl packages
s/autopktest/autopkgtest/
> Packages using the tests with autopkgtests in thi
On 2020-12-08 08:45, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 2020, ഡിസംബർ 8 10:53:26 AM IST, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 2020-12-07 20:46, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>> I have fixed node-request to work with node-uuid 8 API and it also fixed
>>> yarnpkg/gitla
Hello,
On 2020-12-07 20:46, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I have fixed node-request to work with node-uuid 8 API and it also fixed
> yarnpkg/gitlab.
Does this mean node-request is going to be part of bullseye? There was a
mass bug filling (see #974064 for example) suggesting otherwise.
Best,
Andrius
Hello,
It seems #975794 (node-ws) and #975819 (node-agent-base) are related as
they concern the same piece of code of agent-base, which is packaged in
node-agent-base and embedded in node-ws. Removing agent-base source from
node-ws is underway (#972541).
Best,
Andrius
--
Pkg-javascript-devel ma
Source: node-url-parse
Hello,
'node-url-parse' embeds a copy of source code of 'assume' node module,
which has recently entered Debian as 'node-assume'. Please switch from
embedded code copy to Debian-packaged module.
Best,
Andrius
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alio
Source: node-original
Hello,
'node-original' embeds a copy of source code of 'assume' node module,
which has recently entered Debian as 'node-assume'. Please switch from
embedded code copy to Debian-packaged module.
Best,
Andrius
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth
Hello,
On 2020-11-05 11:37, Paul Wise wrote:
> Based solely on the usage information in the README, their APIs are
> compatible, so just changing from fn.name to fn-name or vice versa in
> the require() call will be enough to switch between them.
Thanks, I will try it.
> I'm not sure which one i
Hi Paul,
On 2020-11-05 01:27, Paul Wise wrote:
> Based on the GitHub descriptions, node-fn.name and node-fn-name have
> identical functionality. Should one of them be removed from Debian and
> should one of the upstream projects be replaced by the other within the
> NodeJS ecosystem? It seems poin
Source: node-ws
Version: 7.3.1+~cs24.0.5-1
Dear Maintainer(s),
node-ws embeds nodejs module agent-base which has recently entered
Debian as package node-agent-base. Please remove the embedded module and
depend on node-agent-base instead.
Best wishes,
Andrius
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing lis
On 2020-09-03 16:23, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Andrius Merkys (2020-09-03 14:59:38)
>> On 2020-09-03 15:54, Xavier wrote:
>>> buffer-equal:
>>> - node-buffer-equal (1.0.0)
>>> - node-vinyl-fs (1.0.0)
>> Does this (and the like) mea
Hi Xavier,
On 2020-09-03 15:54, Xavier wrote:
> buffer-equal:
> - node-buffer-equal (1.0.0)
> - node-vinyl-fs (1.0.0)
Does this (and the like) mean that is now packaged as
node-? If so, such embedded modules might be removed.
Best,
Andrius
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-
On 2020-07-10 12:38, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I suspect you are wrong about relaxing lower bounds to only upstream
> part.
I got this idea from the way the issue was fixed in node-expat [1].
Could you explain why you think this is a bad idea?
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-expat/-/co
66 matches
Mail list logo