On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:13:35PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 shrinksafe
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> I uploaded a new version of rhino a while ago and it seems this bug is still
> relevant. I have rebuilt dojo with rhino 1.7.14 and all shrinksafe tests pass.
> Howe
FYI: The status of the node-webfont source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 11.4.0+dfsg2+~cs35.7.26-2
Current version: 11.4.0+dfsg2+~cs35.7.26-7
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happ
Le mer. 1 mars 2023 à 02:30, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
> Jérémy Lal dixit:
>
> >I can build nodejs on amhdal.debian.org if you're not comfortable with
> that.
>
> The problem with the DSA porterboxen is that you cannot install your own
> built packages in the chroot to use them there… unless ther
Jérémy Lal dixit:
>I can build nodejs on amhdal.debian.org if you're not comfortable with that.
The problem with the DSA porterboxen is that you cannot install your own
built packages in the chroot to use them there… unless there’s a
solution not yet known to me?
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“ah that re
That'd be great, thank you - my local (emulated) aarch64 build of
nodejs is proving to be much more time consuming than I expected.
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 23:21, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>
>
>
> Le mar. 28 févr. 2023 à 19:06, James Addison a écrit :
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023, 17:55 Thorsten Glaser wr
Le mar. 28 févr. 2023 à 19:06, James Addison a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023, 17:55 Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
>> Can you test it? I don’t have the bandwidth for that right now…
>
>
> Should be able to, yep - I seem to remember seeing some repro instructions
> from you on the GitHub thread and wi
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 shrinksafe
Bug #977027 [rhino] rhino breaks dojo autopkgtest: Cannot set property "dojo"
of null to "[object Object]"
Bug reassigned from package 'rhino' to 'shrinksafe'.
No longer marked as found in versions rhino/1.7.7.2-1.
Ignoring request to alter fi
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023, 17:55 Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Can you test it? I don’t have the bandwidth for that right now…
Should be able to, yep - I seem to remember seeing some repro instructions
from you on the GitHub thread and will give those a try in an emulator/vm.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mai
James Addison dixit:
>Hi - what do you both think of the attached patch, which brings the ARM stack
>size into line with almost all other architectures (= 984 KB)?
It might do the job unless arm64 for some reason uses more stack
elsewhere as well.
Can you test it? I don’t have the bandwidth for
Package: nodejs
Followup-For: Bug #1030284
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
Hi - what do you both think of the attached patch, which brings the ARM stack
size into line with almost all other architectures (= 984 KB)?
(there is a reason not to increase the stack size further: there is a static
asserti
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 17:45:37 +0400
Source: node-cookiejar
Architecture: source
Version: 2.1.4+~2.1.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Mainta
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: node-cookie...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:node-cookiejar
[ Reason ]
node-cookiejar is vulnerable to ReDoS (CVE-2022-25901).
[ Impact ]
Medium secu
node-cookiejar_2.1.4+~2.1.2-1_sourceonly.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
node-cookiejar_2.1.4+~2.1.2-1.dsc
node-cookiejar_2.1.4+~2.1.2.orig-types-cookiejar.tar.gz
node-cookiejar_2.1.4+~2.1.2.orig.tar.gz
node-cookiejar_2.1.4+~2.1.2-1.debian.tar.xz
Greetings
13 matches
Mail list logo
