On Sat, 2020-09-12 at 11:31 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> Unfortunately, ndo...@twitter.com bounces:
...
> Shall I just package twemoji since it's unlikely that it's non-free?
I would try to contact other recent contributors to the project or if
that fails just open an issue on github to discuss i
Your message dated Sat, 12 Sep 2020 15:19:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#970173: fixed in node-fetch 2.6.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #970173,
regarding node-fetch: CVE-2020-15168
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 10:51:05 -0400
Source: node-fetch
Architecture: source
Version: 2.6.1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Changed-By: Nicolas Mora
Closes: 970173
Ch
node-fetch_2.6.1-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-fetch_2.6.1-1.dsc
node-fetch_2.6.1.orig.tar.gz
node-fetch_2.6.1-1.debian.tar.xz
node-fetch_2.6.1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Processing control commands:
> found -1 1.7.3-1
Bug #970173 [src:node-fetch] node-fetch: CVE-2020-15168
Marked as found in versions node-fetch/1.7.3-1.
--
970173: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970173
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
Source: node-fetch
Version: 1.7.3-2
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Control: found -1 1.7.3-1
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for node-fetch.
CVE-2020-15168[0]:
| node-fetch before versions 2.6.1 and 3.0.0-beta.9 di
Hi,
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020, Xavier wrote:
> Something like:
>
> $ salsa --group xx-team --all --no-fail protect_branch master no
> $ salsa --group xx-team --all --no-fail rename_branch \
> --source-branch=master --dest-branch=debian/master
> $ salsa --group xx-team --all --no-fail re
Paul Wise writes:
> On Sun, 2020-08-23 at 10:34 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
>
>> I did not find an email address on github
>
> Normally you can get an email address by appending .patch to the commit
> URL, but in this case the commit is too big to do that. So you will
> have to clone the repositor
